Intimate partner violence: How should health systems respond?

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a common and serious public health concern, worldwide and in South Africa. Exposure to IPV leads to wide-ranging and serious health effects, and there is evidence that intervening for IPV in primary healthcare settings can improve outcomes. World Health Organization guidelines for responding to IPV and sexual violence recommend enquiring about violence when relevant in healthcare encounters and providing women-centred care. Women who have experienced IPV have described an appropriate response by healthcare providers to be non-judgemental, understanding and empathetic. Despite this, the evidence base informing the scale-up of IPV interventions and their integration into health systems is lacking. Further evaluations of health sector responses to IPV are needed to assist health services to determine the most appropriate models of care and how these can be integrated into current systems. The need for this research should not prevent health systems and healthcare providers from implementing IPV care, but rather should guide the development of rigorous, contextually appropriate evaluations. There is also an urgent need for policies and protocols that clearly frame IPV as an important health issue and support healthcare providers in enquiring about and responding to IPV

Implementing intimate partner violence care in a rural sub-district of South Africa: a qualitative evaluation

Background: Despite a high burden of disease, in many health districts in the Wes tern Cape, South Africa, intimate partner violence is known to be poorly recognised and managed. To address this gap in service an innovative intersectoral model for the delivery of comprehensive intimate partner violence (IPV) care was piloted in the Witzenberg, a rural, agricultural sub - district known to have a high incidence of IPV. It was not known whether the initiative was a success from the perspective of the women using the service, from the service providers or from the managers. Methods: A qualitative evaluation was conducted. Ten service users were interviewed to explore their experience of the intervention. Two focus groups were conducted amongst health care workers, and one focus group and six interviews were conducted with the intersectoral implementation team, to understand their experience of implementing the intervention. Documents relating to the pilot were also analysed. A contextualized thematic content analysis approach was used, triangulating the various sources of data, and utilising inductive as well as deductive approaches. Results: Over the pilot period 75 women received the intervention. Study participants described their experience of it as overwhelmingly positive, with some experiencing improvements in their home lives. Significant access barriers included unaffordable indirect costs, fear of loss of confidentiality, and fear of children being removed from the home. For health care workers, barriers to inquiry about intimate partner violence included its normalisation in this community, poor understanding of the complexities of living with violence and frustration in managing a difficult emotional problem. Health system constraints impacted on the pilot, affecting continuity of care, privacy and integration of the intervention into routine functioning, and the process of intersectoral action was hindered by the formation of alliances. Contextual factors, for example high levels of alcohol misuse and socioeconomic disempowerment highlighted the need for a multifaceted approach to addressing intimate partner violence. Conclusion: The results of this qualitative evaluation draw attention to the need to take a health systems approach and focus on contextual factors when implementing complex interventions. They will be used to inform decisions about instituting appropriate intimate partner violence care in the rest of the province. Additionally, there is a pressing need for clear policies and guidelines framing intimate partner violence as a health issue

Exploring the provision and support of care for long-term conditions in dementia: A qualitative study combining interviews and document analysis

Background: The challenge of managing multiple long-term conditions is a prevalent issue for people with dementia and those who support their care. The presence of dementia complicates healthcare delivery and the development of personalised care plans, as health systems and clinical guidelines are often designed around single condition services. Objective: This study aimed to explore how care for long-term conditions is provided and supported for people with dementia in the community. Methods: In a qualitative, case study design, consecutive telephone or video-call interviews were conducted with people with dementia, their family carers and healthcare providers over a four-month period. Participant accounts were triangulated with documentary analysis of primary care medical records and event-based diaries kept by participants with dementia. Thematic analysis was used to develop across-group themes. Findings: Six main themes were identified from eight case studies: 1) Balancing support and independence, 2) Implementing and adapting advice for dementia contexts, 3) Prioritising physical, cognitive and mental health needs, 4) Competing and entwined needs and priorities, 5) Curating supportive professional networks, 6) Family carer support and coping. Discussion: These findings reflect the dynamic nature of dementia care which requires the adaptation of support in response to changing need. We witnessed the daily realities for families of implementing care recommendations in the community, which were often adapted for the contexts of family carers’ priorities for care of the person living with dementia and what they were able to provide. Realistic self-management plans which are deliverable in practice must consider the intersection of physical, cognitive and mental health needs and priorities, and family carers needs and resources

Implementing intimate partner violence care in a rural sub-district of South Africa: a qualitative evaluation

Background: Despite a high burden of disease, in South Africa, intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to be poorly recognised and managed. To address this gap, an innovative intersectoral model for the delivery of comprehensive IPV care was piloted in a rural sub-district. Objective: To evaluate the initiative from the perspectives of women using the service, service providers, and managers. Design: A qualitative evaluation was conducted. Service users were interviewed, focus groups were conducted amongst health care workers (HCW), and a focus group and interviews were conducted with the intersectoral implementation team to explore their experiences of the intervention. A thematic analysis approach was used, triangulating the various sources of data. Results: During the pilot, 75 women received the intervention. Study participants described their experience as overwhelmingly positive, with some experiencing improvements in their home lives. Significant access barriers included unaffordable indirect costs, fear of loss of confidentiality, and fear of children being removed from the home. For HCW, barriers to inquiry about IPV included its normalisation in this community, poor understanding of the complexities of living with violence and frustration in managing a difficult emotional problem. Health system constraints affected continuity of care, privacy, and integration of the intervention into routine functioning, and the process of intersectoral action was hindered by the formation of alliances. Contextual factors, for example, high levels of alcohol misuse and socio-economic disempowerment, highlighted the need for a multifaceted approach to addressing IPV. Conclusions: This evaluation draws attention to the need to take a systems approach and focus on contextual factors when implementing complex interventions. The results will be used to inform decisions about instituting appropriate IPV care in the rest of the province. In addition, there is a pressing need for clear policies and guidelines framing IPV as a health issue

Workplace wellbeing among health care workers providing HIV services in primary care in Johannesburg: a mixed methods study

BackgroundBurnout among Health Care workers (HCWs) impacts on provider-patient relations and quality of care. Anova Health Institute (Anova) is a large South African non-profit organization and PEPFAR/USAID implementing partner. We conducted a study among HCWs providing HIV-related services in primary care settings in Johannesburg, South Africa, to examine levels of burnout, understand factors affecting workplace wellbeing, and explore strategies to prevent burnout.MethodsWe used a sequential mixed-method approach. Data were collected between February and April 2022. The first phase consisted of a survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) to measure levels of burnout. We then interviewed a subset of survey participants to understand the experiences that may affect wellbeing. We used descriptive statistics to quantify burnout rates for each MBI dimension (emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, and depersonalization). Qualitative data analysis was guided by the Job Demands-Resources Framework that explores the interactions between demands and resources in the workplace.ResultsSurvey findings (n = 194) revealed that although depersonalization rates were low at 6%, 21% of participants had high emotional exhaustion and 24% reported low professional accomplishment. Less than half (41%, n = 80) had scores in the high category for any one of the three MBI-HSS dimensions. The MBI-HSS dimensions differed significantly by type of work and job title. Roving positions (HCW working in more than one health facility) were more likely to experience higher emotional exhaustion and lower professional accomplishment. Qualitative findings (n = 25) indicate that a number of job demands, including high workload, inadequate mental health support, and challenging relationships with stakeholders, had a negative effect on HCWs’ wellbeing. However, finding meaningfulness in their work, working as a team, and practicing autonomy were experienced as resources that reduced the negative effect of these demands.ConclusionWhile measured burnout syndrome rates were low, various experiences negatively impacted at least one in five HCW. We identified key resources that provided buffering against workplace stressors. We recommend that as well as addressing key drivers of burnout, access to these resources should be fostered, for example by strengthening interventions that offer recognition, and promoting team interactions through social activities and support groups

Continuity of care for carers of people with severe mental illness: results of a longitudinal study

Introduction: Continuity of care has been demonstrated to be important for service users and carer groups have voiced major concerns over disruptions of care. We aimed to assess the experienced continuity of care in carers of patients with both psychotic and non-psychotic disorders and explore its association with carer characteristics and psychological well-being. Methods: Friends and relatives caring for two groups of service users in the care of community mental health teams (CMHTs), 69 with psychotic and 38 with non-psychotic disorders, were assessed annually at three and two time points, respectively. CONTINUES, a measure specifically designed to assess continuity of care for carers themselves, was utilized along with assessments of psychological well-being and caregiving. Results: One hundred and seven carers participated. They reported moderately low continuity of care. Only 22 had had a carer’s assessment and just under a third recorded psychological distress on the GHQ. For those caring for people with psychotic disorders, reported continuity was higher if the carer was male, employed, lived with the user and had had a carer’s assessment; for those caring for people with non-psychotic disorders, it was higher if the carer was from the service user’s immediate family, lived with them and had had a carer’s assessment. Conclusion: The vast majority of the carers had not had a carer’s assessment provided by the CMHT despite this being a clear national priority and being an intervention with obvious potential to increase carers’ reported low levels of continuity of care. Improving continuity of contact with carers may have an important part to play in the overall improvement of care in this patient group and deserves greater attention

Risk profile of postnatal women and their babies attending a rural district hospital in South Africa

BackgroundMaternal and neonatal mortality remain unacceptably high and inequitably distributed in South Africa, with the postnatal period being a dangerous time for both mother and baby. The aim of this paper is to describe the risk factors for poor postnatal outcomes, including postnatal mental health disorders, in a population of postnatal women and their babies utilising rural district hospital services in Limpopo Province, with a focus on HIV. We also describe health care provider compliance with relevant guidelines.MethodsAll women discharged from the postnatal ward of the district hospital who consented to participate were enrolled. A research nurse used a structured questionnaire to collect data about sociodemographic information, pregnancy and pre-existing conditions, complications during labour and birth, pregnancy outcomes and mental health risk factors.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed for 882 women at the time of discharge. Only 354 (40.2%) of participants had completed secondary education, and 105 (11.9%) reported formal employment. Chronic hypertension was recorded in 20 women (2.3%), with an additional 49 (5.6%) developing a hypertensive disorder during pregnancy. HIV prevalence was 22.8%. 216 women (24.5%) had a mental health risk factor, with 40 reporting more than one (4.5%). Having no income, no antenatal care, having HIV and any hypertensive disorder were significantly associated with a positive mental health risk screen in multivariable analysis. There were 31 stillbirths and early neonatal deaths (3.5%), and 119 babies (13.4%) were born at a low birth weight. Stillbirth or early neonatal death was significantly associated with no antenatal care in multivariable analysis.ConclusionsWomen and babies in this study experienced multiple risk factors for poor outcomes in the postpartum period. Postnatal care should be strengthened in order to address the dominant risks to mothers and babies, including socioeconomic challenges, HIV and hypertension, and risks to mental health. Tools to identify mothers and babies at risk of postnatal complications would allow limited resources to be allocated where they are most needed

Understanding patients reinitiating antiretroviral therapy in two South African districts.

Antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage is South Africa’s biggest obstacle to 90-90-90 achievement. Many people living with HIV who are not on ART have started but experienced interrupted treatment. A major programmatic challenge is how to return them to care. We aim to describe patients reinitiating ART in two districts to inform these efforts. As part of evaluating a campaign to return patients to care (Welcome Back Campaign), we asked lay counsellors to collect data on all patients reinitiating ART. Data collection started in August 2021 and we report data through September 2021 for two districts, one metropolitan and one district municipality. Two hundred and seventeen forms were completed, 120 from Cape Town and 97 from Sedibeng. Fifty-eight percent (n = 126) of reinitiating patients were women. Thirty-two percent (n = 68) had interrupted treatment for three months or less, while 40% (n = 85) had interrupted treatment for more than 12 months. The commonest reported reason for interruption in Cape Town was relocation or mobility (27%; n = 32), followed by difficulty getting time off work (15%; n = 17) and disclosure issues (9%; n = 11). In Sedibeng the top reasons were difficulty getting time off work (21%; n = 20), relocation (18%; n = 17) and long waiting times (12%; n = 12). Women were more likely to report disclosure issues and being scared to come back to the clinic as a reason for interrupting, while men were more likely to cite staff attitude. Reasons for returning to care included worry about being off ART (38%; n = 82), feeling sick (15%; n = 34) and tracing (12%; n = 27). Men were more likely to report illness and improved accessibility as a reason for seeking care, while women were more likely to report media messaging. It is critical that health services are supportive of patients reinitiating ART after interruptions, and that more enabling systems for patients moving between clinics are developed. Nudges should be developed to encourage people already worried about having interrupted treatment to reinitiate it