Precision Oncology in Pancreatic Cancer: Experiences and Challenges of the CCCMunichLMU Molecular Tumor Board

Background!#!In pancreatic cancer, systemic treatment options in addition to chemotherapy remain scarce, and so far only a small proportion of patients benefit from targeted therapies.!##!Objective!#!The patients with pancreatic cancer discussed in the CCCMunich!##!Methods!#!Patients with pancreatic cancer who received comprehensive genomic profiling and were discussed in the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board between May 2017 and July 2022 were included. These patients' medical charts, comprehensive genomic profiling results, and Molecular Tumor Board recommendations were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study.!##!Results!#!Molecular profiles of 165 patients with pancreatic cancer were discussed in the Molecular Tumor Board. In the 149 cases where comprehensive genomic profiling was successful, KRAS mutations were detected in 87.9%, TP53 in 53.0%, and CDKN2A in 14.1%. 33.3% of KRAS wild-type patients harbored targetable mutations, while these were only found in 19.1% of patients with the KRAS mutation; however, this difference was not statistically significant. 63.8% of patients with successful testing received a targeted treatment recommendation by the Molecular Tumor Board; however, only 3.2% of these were put into practice. Compared to a historic cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer with synchronous metastatic disease diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort with synchronous metastatic disease had a longer survival.!##!Conclusions!#!This single-center experience emphasizes the challenges of targeted treatment in pancreatic cancer. Very few patients ultimately received the recommended therapies, highlighting the need for more and better targeted treatment options in pancreatic cancer, early comprehensive genomic profiling to allow sufficient time to put Molecular Tumor Board recommendations into practice, and close cooperation with clinical trial units to give patients access to otherwise not available targeted treatments

Immunomodulatory effects of CD44-positive vascular wall-resident stem and progenitor cells in myocardial tissue

Die Identifizierung endogener Stammzellen mit kardiogenem Potenzial und die Möglichkeit, deren Differenzierung zu steuern, würde einen Meilenstein in der kardioregenerativen Therapie darstellen. Innerhalb der Gefäßwand konnten unterschiedliche Stamm- und Vorläuferzellen identifiziert werden, die sog. Gefäßwand-residenten Stammzellen (VW-SCs). Zuletzt konnten aus CD34(+) VW-SCs, ohne genetische Manipulation, Kardiomyozyten generiert werden. Zusätzlich fungiert die Gefäßwand als Quelle inflammatorischer Zellen, die essenziell für die kardiogene Differenzierung der VW-SCs zu sein scheinen. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, das Verhalten von CD44(+) VW-SCs zu untersuchen, um herauszufinden, inwieweit dieser Stammzelltyp eine endogene Generierung von Kardiomyozyten unterstützen könnte. Dabei wurde mit infarzierten Mäuseherzen, dem Aortenringassay (ARA) und dem kardialen Angiogeneseassay (CAA) gearbeitet. Sowohl in vivo in ischämischen Arealen infarzierter Mäuseherzen als auch ex vivo im CAA kam es zu einem signifikanten Anstieg von CD44(+) Zellen. Mittels Färbungen auf CD44 und Ki-67 konnte die Teilungsfähigkeit dieser Zellen demonstriert werden. Ex vivo ließen sich aus CD44(+) Zellen F4/80(+) Makrophagen generieren. Die CD44(+) VW-SCs können sich dabei sowohl zu pro-inflammatorischen iNOS(+) M1- als auch zu anti-inflammatorischen IL-10(+) M2-Makrophagen differenzieren. Eine Modulation der kardialen Inflammation könnte einen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Kardiomyogenese haben. Unter VEGF-A kam es im CAA zu einer deutlichen Zunahme von CD44(+) Zellen. Unter Lenvatinib blieb das kardiale Sprouting gänzlich aus, die Anzahl der CD44(+) Zellen stagnierte und die VW-SCs verblieben in ihren physiologischen Nischen innerhalb der Gefäßwand. Warum es nach einem MI kaum zu einer funktionellen Herzmuskelregeneration kommt, ist weiterhin unklar. Die therapeutische Beeinflussung koronaradventitieller CD44(+) VW-SCs und inflammatorischer Prozesse könnte dabei zukünftig eine wichtige therapeutische Option darstellen.The identification of endogenous stem cells with cardiogenic potential and the possibility to control their differentiation would represent a milestone in cardioregenerative therapy. Within the vascular wall, different stem and progenitor cells could be identified, the so-called vascular wall-resident stem cells (VW-SCs). Most recently, cardiomyocytes could be generated from CD34(+) VW-SCs, without genetic manipulation. In addition, the vascular wall acts as a source of inflammatory cells which appear to be essential for cardiogenic differentiation of VW-SCs. The objective of this work was to investigate the behavior of CD44(+) VW-SCs to see to what extent this stem cell type could support endogenous generation of cardiomyocytes. This was done using infarcted mouse hearts, the aortic ring assay (ARA), and the cardiac angiogenesis assay (CAA). There was a significant increase in CD44(+) cells in vivo in ischemic areas of infarcted mouse hearts and ex vivo in the CAA. A double staining for CD44 and Ki-67 demonstrated the ability of these cells to proliferate. Ex vivo, F4/80(+) macrophages could be generated from CD44(+) cells. Thereby, the CD44(+) VW-SCs can differentiate into both pro-inflammatory iNOS(+) M1 and anti-inflammatory IL-10(+) M2 macrophages. Modulation of cardiac inflammation may have a critical impact on cardiomyogenesis. Under VEGF-A, there was a clear increase in CD44(+) cells in the CAA. Under lenvatinib, cardiac sprouting was completely absent, the number of CD44(+) cells stagnated, and VW-SCs remained in their physiological niches within the vessel wall. Why there is little functional myocardial regeneration after MI remains unclear. Therapeutic manipulation of coronary adventitial CD44(+) VW-SCs and inflammatory processes may represent an important therapeutic option in the future