Development of a facial expression scale using footrot and mastitis as models of pain in sheep

Management of pain in sheep is limited by the challenges of recognising and accurately quantifying pain in this species. The use of facial expression scoring to assess pain is a well-utilised, practical tool in both humans and non-human animals. The objective of this study was to develop a standardised facial expression pain scale for adult sheep, that could be used reliably and accurately to detect pain associated with naturally occurring painful diseases, such as footrot and mastitis. We also investigated whether the scale could be reliably and accurately utilised by observers after training, enabling the development of an on-farm pain assessment tool. The Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale (SPFES) was able to correctly identify sheep suffering from disease with a high degree of accuracy (AUC; Footrot: 0.81, Mastitis: 0.80). Diseased sheep scored higher on the scale than controls on the day of disease identification (P<0.05) and diseased sheep showed changes in their facial expression after treatment (P<0.001). The abnormal facial expressions of diseased sheep reduced over time, and at recovery were in line with control sheep. Control sheep did not change their facial expression over time. Five scorers who were trained to use the developed scale also assessed the facial expressions of sheep. The scorers were blind to treatment and session. Scorers reliably (ICC: 0.86) and accurately (α = 0.86) identified changes in the facial expression of sheep with footrot over time (P<0.05), and scored control sheep consistently low over time. The SPFES offers a reliable and effective method of assessing pain in sheep after minimal training.We would like to thank the EU VII Framework Program (FP7-KBBE-2010-4) for funding this study as part of the AWIN project. Boehringer Imgelheim Ltd are thanked for providing the meloxicam used in this study.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.00

Technical note: Validation of an automatic recording system to assess behavioural activity level in sheep (Ovis aries)

The welfare of an individual can be assessed by monitoring behavioural changes, such as inactivity, that may indicate injury or disease. In this study we validated the Actiwatch Mini® activity monitor (AM) for automatic recording of behavioural activity levels of nine Texel ewes. The AM devices were attached to collars placed around the necks of the ewes. AM recordings were taken at 25 second intervals for 21 consecutive days and in addition, direct behavioural observations made on days 9–13. AM recordings were compared with direct behavioural observations to investigate whether different levels of behaviour activity could be distinguished by the AM. Six different behaviours were matched to the activity scores recorded by the AM which were low activity (lying ruminating, lying), medium activity (standing, standing ruminating, and grazing) and high activity behaviours (walking). There were differences in the activity scores for all three scores. However, higher levels of accuracy in distinguishing between activity levels were achieved when combining high and medium activity level behaviours. This method of capturing data provides a practical tool in studies assessing the impact of disease or injury. For example, assessing the effects of lameness on the activity level of sheep at pasture, without the presence of an observer influencing behaviour.The authors thank the staff at the farm, at which data were collected, for supporting the study and for taking good care of the animals. This study was part of a project funded by the EU VII Framework programme Animal Welfare Indicators (Grant no. FP7-KBBE-2010-4) who had no involvement in the study design, data collection, data analysis or writing of the report. The Actiwatches’ were provided to AJM through funding from CHDI Foundation, Inc.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448815001455