Use of human milk fortifier in preterm infants in the community: practical experience from clinical cases

Introduction: Breast milk supplementation with a multicomponent Human Milk Fortifier (HMF) has been shown to be safe and effective in preterm infants in neonatal units, while there is little clinical evidence on its use post-discharge. This series of case-studies aimed to investigate practical use and experience of HMF supplementation in preterm infants with different conditions in the community. Methods: Preterm infants experiencing faltering growth were recruited from two UK neonatal units and supplemented with a novel HMF containing long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, medium-chain fatty acids, and anhydrous milk fat as source of beta-palmitate for >7 days in the community. Compliance with prescription, anthropometrics and growth, gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance, acceptability and safety were recorded at baseline, on day of hospital discharge and at the end of intervention. Results: Fourteen infants (mean age: 35weeks+4days (SD 2w+5d) were supplemented with HMF for 29days (SD2, range 15-55) in the community (mean intake 6.2g/d (SD2.6), 26.8kcal/d (SD11.4)), with n=12 being initiated in hospital (mean duration of supplementation=12days (SD11), range 0-37), n=1 on day of discharge and n=1 in the community. Mean compliance was 96% (SD13), with n=13 consuming 100% of HMF prescribed by their healthcare professional (HCP). Infants showed an increase in mean weight (+1.14kg SD0.58), length (+6.66cm SD3.91) and head circumference (+4.35cm SD2.86), with improvement in weight-for-age and length-for-age Z-scores compared to baseline. Mean growth velocity during the intervention period was 15.7g/kg/day (SD 8.62), being 18.0g/kg/day (SD 13) during hospital stay and 10.6g/kg/day (SD 4.4) in the community. Twelve infants (86%) met their growth goal at the end of intervention. There were no GI concerns with the use of HMF, with n=3 experiencing no GI symptoms and n=11 experiencing a few minor symptoms. Most parents (79%) found HMF easy to use and were satisfied overall. Conclusion: The novel HMF supported infants’ growth both during hospital stay and, in the community, whilst being well complied with and accepted overall. No tolerance concerns were reported in this study population. Clear guidelines and standardised protocol on how to use HMF post-discharge are needed

A multi-center prospective study of plant-based nutritional support in adult community-based patients at risk of disease-related malnutrition

IntroductionThere is an emerging need for plant-based, vegan options for patients requiring nutritional support.MethodsTwenty-four adults at risk of malnutrition (age: 59 years (SD 18); Sex: 18 female, 6 male; BMI: 19.0 kg/m2 (SD 3.3); multiple diagnoses) requiring plant-based nutritional support participated in a multi-center, prospective study of a (vegan suitable) multi-nutrient, ready-to-drink, oral nutritional supplement (ONS) [1.5 kcal/mL; 300 kcal, 12 g protein/200 mL bottle, mean prescription 275 mL/day (SD 115)] alongside dietary advice for 28 days. Compliance, anthropometry, malnutrition risk, dietary intake, appetite, acceptability, gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance, nutritional goal(s), and safety were assessed.ResultsPatients required a plant-based ONS due to personal preference/variety (33%), religious/cultural reasons (28%), veganism/reduce animal-derived consumption (17%), environmental/sustainability reasons (17%), and health reasons (5%). Compliance was 94% (SD 16). High risk of malnutrition (‘MUST’ score ≥ 2) reduced from 20 to 16 patients (p = 0.046). Body weight (+0.6 kg (SD 1.2), p = 0.02), BMI (+0.2 kg/m2 (SD 0.5), p = 0.03), total mean energy (+387 kcal/day (SD 416), p < 0.0001) and protein intake (+14 g/day (SD 39), p = 0.03), and the number of micronutrients meeting the UK reference nutrient intake (RNI) (7 vs. 14, p = 0.008) significantly increased. Appetite (Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) score; p = 0.13) was maintained. Most GI symptoms were stable throughout the study (p > 0.06) with no serious adverse events related.DiscussionThis study highlights that plant-based nutrition support using a vegan-suitable plant-based ONS is highly complied with, improving the nutritional outcomes of patients at risk of malnutrition

Evaluation of a New Glycomacropeptide-Based Protein Substitute in Powdered and Liquid Format in Patients with PKU

Peer reviewed: TrueFunder: Nutricia Ltd.(1) Background: Good adherence to a Phe-restricted diet supplemented with an adequate amount of a protein substitute (PS) is important for good clinical outcomes in PKU. Glycomacropeptide (cGMP)-PSs are innovative, palatable alternatives to amino acid-based PSs (AA-PS). This study aimed to evaluate a new cGMP-PS in liquid and powder formats in PKU. (2) Methods: Children and adults with PKU recruited from eight centres were prescribed at least one serving/day of cGMP-PS for 7–28 days. Adherence, acceptability, and gastrointestinal tolerance were recorded at baseline and the end of the intervention. The blood Phe levels reported as part of routine care during the intervention were recorded. (3) Results: In total, 23 patients (powder group, n = 13; liquid group, n = 10) completed the study. The majority assessed the products to be palatable (77% of powder group; 100% of liquid group) and well tolerated; the adherence to the product prescription was good. A total of 14 patients provided blood Phe results during the intervention, which were within the target therapeutic range for most patients (n = 11) at baseline and during the intervention. (4) Conclusions: These new cGMP-PSs were well accepted and tolerated, and their use did not adversely affect blood Phe control

Evaluation of a New 'Mix-In' Style Glycomacropeptide-Based Protein Substitute for Food and Drinks in Patients with Phenylketonuria and Tyrosinemia.

(1) Background: Poor palatability, large volume, and lack of variety of some liquid and powdered protein substitutes (PSs) for patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) and tyrosinemia (TYR) can result in poor adherence. This study aimed to evaluate a new unflavoured, powdered GMP-based PS designed to be mixed into drinks, foods, or with other PSs, in patients with PKU and TYR. (2) Methods: Paediatric and adult community-based patients were recruited from eight metabolic centres and prescribed ≥1 sachet/day (10 g protein equivalent (PE)) of the Mix-In-style PS over 28 days. Adherence, palatability, GI tolerance, and metabolic control were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Patients who completed at least 7 days of intervention were included in the final analysis. (3) Results: Eighteen patients (3-45 years, nine males) with PKU (n = 12) and TYR (n = 6) used the Mix-In-style PS for ≥7 days (mean 26.4 days (SD 4.6), range 11-28 days) alongside their previous PS, with a mean intake of 16.7 g (SD 7.7) PE/day. Adherence was 86% (SD 25), and GI tolerance was stable, with n = 14 experiencing no/no new symptoms and n = 3 showing improved symptoms compared to baseline. Overall palatability was rated satisfactory by 78% of patients, who successfully used the Mix-In-style PS in various foods and drinks, including smoothies, squash, and milk alternatives, as a top-up to meet their protein needs. There was no concern regarding safety/metabolic control during the intervention. (4) Conclusions: The 'Mix-In'-style PS was well adhered to, accepted, and tolerated. Collectively, these data show that providing a flexible, convenient, and novel format of PS can help with adherence and meet patients' protein needs

Evaluation of a New Glycomacropeptide-Based Protein Substitute in Powdered and Liquid Format in Patients with PKU.

(1) Background: Good adherence to a Phe-restricted diet supplemented with an adequate amount of a protein substitute (PS) is important for good clinical outcomes in PKU. Glycomacropeptide (cGMP)-PSs are innovative, palatable alternatives to amino acid-based PSs (AA-PS). This study aimed to evaluate a new cGMP-PS in liquid and powder formats in PKU. (2) Methods: Children and adults with PKU recruited from eight centres were prescribed at least one serving/day of cGMP-PS for 7-28 days. Adherence, acceptability, and gastrointestinal tolerance were recorded at baseline and the end of the intervention. The blood Phe levels reported as part of routine care during the intervention were recorded. (3) Results: In total, 23 patients (powder group, n = 13; liquid group, n = 10) completed the study. The majority assessed the products to be palatable (77% of powder group; 100% of liquid group) and well tolerated; the adherence to the product prescription was good. A total of 14 patients provided blood Phe results during the intervention, which were within the target therapeutic range for most patients (n = 11) at baseline and during the intervention. (4) Conclusions: These new cGMP-PSs were well accepted and tolerated, and their use did not adversely affect blood Phe control

Evaluation of a New ‘Mix-In’ Style Glycomacropeptide-Based Protein Substitute for Food and Drinks in Patients with Phenylketonuria and Tyrosinemia

Peer reviewed: TrueFunder: Nutricia Ltd.(1) Background: Poor palatability, large volume, and lack of variety of some liquid and powdered protein substitutes (PSs) for patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) and tyrosinemia (TYR) can result in poor adherence. This study aimed to evaluate a new unflavoured, powdered GMP-based PS designed to be mixed into drinks, foods, or with other PSs, in patients with PKU and TYR. (2) Methods: Paediatric and adult community-based patients were recruited from eight metabolic centres and prescribed ≥1 sachet/day (10 g protein equivalent (PE)) of the Mix-In-style PS over 28 days. Adherence, palatability, GI tolerance, and metabolic control were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Patients who completed at least 7 days of intervention were included in the final analysis. (3) Results: Eighteen patients (3–45 years, nine males) with PKU (n = 12) and TYR (n = 6) used the Mix-In-style PS for ≥7 days (mean 26.4 days (SD 4.6), range 11–28 days) alongside their previous PS, with a mean intake of 16.7 g (SD 7.7) PE/day. Adherence was 86% (SD 25), and GI tolerance was stable, with n = 14 experiencing no/no new symptoms and n = 3 showing improved symptoms compared to baseline. Overall palatability was rated satisfactory by 78% of patients, who successfully used the Mix-In-style PS in various foods and drinks, including smoothies, squash, and milk alternatives, as a top-up to meet their protein needs. There was no concern regarding safety/metabolic control during the intervention. (4) Conclusions: The ‘Mix-In’-style PS was well adhered to, accepted, and tolerated. Collectively, these data show that providing a flexible, convenient, and novel format of PS can help with adherence and meet patients’ protein needs

Adults with impaired gastrointestinal function show improvements in gastrointestinal symptoms and protein intake with a high-protein, peptide-based oral nutritional supplement

Summary: Background: Provision of feeds containing hydrolysed, peptide-based proteins and medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), can help mitigate gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance in adults with impaired GI function, maldigestion and/or malabsorption. Aim: This study evaluated a high-protein, peptide-based, MCT-containing oral nutritional supplement (PEHP; 1.5 kcal/mL and 7.5 g protein/100 mL). Methods: Adults with impaired GI function were recruited by their managing dietitian and took PEHP orally for 28-days, with GI tolerance, compliance, weight, energy and protein intake assessed via non-validated questionnaires and a 24-hour dietary recall at baseline and at intervention end. Results: Fifteen, adults (56 years (16), 67 kg (26.0), 24 kg/m2 (7.6)) took part in this study. Intensity of nausea (Z= -2.070, p=0.038, n=15) and abdominal pain (Z= -2.236, p=0.025, n=15) improved significantly compared to baseline. Reductions in the intensity of diarrhoea, constipation, vomiting, flatulence, and burping were observed but were not statistically significant (p>0.05 for all). Compliance was higher with PEHP (81% (24)) than baseline feeds (63% (42)) but not significantly. Weight remained stable between baseline (67 kg (26)) and at intervention end (67 kg (27), p=0.414, n=15). Compared to baseline, total energy intake increased with PEHP albeit not significantly (1661 kcal/day (572) vs 1981 kcal/day (592), p=0.137, n=15). Increases in total protein intake were also observed, this time significantly (61 g/day (23) vs 78 g/day (29), p=0.042, n=15). Conclusions: This study in adults with impaired GI function found that PEHP improved GI tolerance and protein intake compared to feeds taken at baseline (including both polymeric and peptide-based feeds)