VISUALIZING THE DATA VISUALIZATION NETWORK: THE DVMAP PROJECT

Data visualization is a familiar buzzword. Experts in the humanities, social and natural sciences, as well as technology, along with semi-experts and the general public, reach people everywhere with trends and conclusions drawn from visualized data. Governments, industries, businesses, sciences, marketers, academics, students and others value data visualization methods and tools as critical, applicable tools for understanding the world, which provide rich information analyses for specialists and generalists alike. Unfortunately, no single resource offers a space where people working in the multifaceted field of data visualization can share projects they are working on, tools they created, educational opportunities in the field, nor where they (and their work) are situated geographically. A research group at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology seeks to fill this gap with a repository of data visualization resources called ―Data Visualization Map (DVMap).‖ The DVMap is an interactive network data and geographic representation graph that provides a data visualization space for people across the world to share, view and/or collaborate on projects and publications; tools deployed or under development; educational opportunities in data visualization, such as formal programs, summer seminars, conferences; and the geographical locations of the users, projects, tools and educational opportunities. Given the necessity of this repository, this paper outlines the structure, underlying methodology, and anticipated outcomes for the DVMap data visualization network. The paper also accounts for limitations of the project and the potential problems of creating a map that wants to share work – especially work in progress – with everyone

Building a Better Future: Solving Seattle’s Housing Crisis

The City of Seattle, like much of the country, faces a serious housing crisis. Houselessness is ubiquitous and most ordinary citizens, many of whom were deemed essential workers during the pandemic, cannot afford to live in Seattle. Much of the workforce is forced to suffer financially or commute long distances, which weakens communities and accelerates climate change. One of the main policy responses to this, at least at the municipal level, has been to up-zone neighborhoods. The assumption behind liberalizing the housing market is that more supply will be generated and in the process the cost of housing will be within reach of more citizens. In short, it presumes that a less regulated housing market will increase supply which in turn will result in more affordable housing. Unfortunately, this is unsubstantiated. Researchers in Chicago and Vancouver have found that up-zoning has neither increased the overall supply of housing nor reduced its costs. Sustainably built, quality housing that all residents can afford is not a profitable venture. Thus, one of our main takeaways is that up-zoning based around for-profit housing development will not address the housing crisis. Moreover, many quality neighborhoods will be upended and up-zoning as a policy (which we believe is needed) will have been discredited because it failed to deliver what many of its advocates promised