Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design

Objective: To confirm the safety of a new experimental Tampax(®) tampon and applicator compared with that of a currently marketed Tampax(®) tampon and applicator using comprehensive gynecological and microbiological assessments. Methods: A 2-month, single-blind, randomized, crossover study was conducted in which each subject served as her own control. Safety was evaluated by comparing potential product-related irritation (using colposcopic examination and subject diary data), assessment of vaginal discharge, vaginal pH, and effects on selected microorganisms (yeast, Escherichia coli ,Staphylococcus aureus and group B streptococci) obtained by vaginal swab cultures after normal menstrual use in the experimental and control groups. Results: In total, 110 women completed the study. There were no significant differences between the groups that used either the experimental or control tampon with regard to prevalence or mean cell density for the selected microorganisms. No differences were observed in the incidence or severity of erythema, in abrasion or ulceration of the cervix, vagina, introitus, vulva or perineum, or in mean vaginal pH and discharge assessments. There were equivalent low incidences of reported symptoms such as discomfort during insertion, wear or removal, and a similar low incidence of burning, stinging or itching during use of either the control or experimental tampon. There was a more favorable overall product rating for the experimental tampon (p = 0.003). Conclusions: This approach provides a combination of gynecological, microbiological and self-reported (diary recall) methodologies in order to assess tampon safety during use more thoroughly than has previously been reported, and it supports a comparable safety profile for the experimental tampon and a currently marketed tampon

Sciatic paralysis following uterine artery embolization

articleInternational audienceEarly postpartum bleeding remains in France the leading cause of maternal mortality in perinatal period. In association with obstetrical and medical measures to control bleeding, uterine arteries embolization constitutes an efficient non-surgical measure whose potential side effects must be kept in mind. We report the case of a patient that presented a popliteal sciatic paralysis in the hours following the procedure. Through this case, we will review the different types of embolization complications