Attention and Sensor Planning in Autonomous Robotic Visual Search

This thesis is concerned with the incorporation of saliency in visual search and the development of sensor planning strategies for visual search. The saliency model is a mixture of two schemes that extracts visual clues regarding the structure of the environment and object specific features. The sensor planning methods, namely Greedy Search with Constraint (GSC), Extended Greedy Search (EGS) and Dynamic Look Ahead Search (DLAS) are approximations to the optimal solution for the problem of object search, as extensions to the work of Yiming Ye. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the proposed methods. They show that by using saliency in search a performance improvement up to 75% is attainable in terms of number of actions taken to complete the search. As for the planning strategies, the GSC algorithm achieved the highest detection rate and the best efficiency in terms of cost it incurs to explore every percentage of an environment

Agreeing to Cross: How Drivers and Pedestrians Communicate

The contribution of this paper is twofold. The first is a novel dataset for studying behaviors of traffic participants while crossing. Our dataset contains more than 650 samples of pedestrian behaviors in various street configurations and weather conditions. These examples were selected from approx. 240 hours of driving in the city, suburban and urban roads. The second contribution is an analysis of our data from the point of view of joint attention. We identify what types of non-verbal communication cues road users use at the point of crossing, their responses, and under what circumstances the crossing event takes place. It was found that in more than 90% of the cases pedestrians gaze at the approaching cars prior to crossing in non-signalized crosswalks. The crossing action, however, depends on additional factors such as time to collision (TTC), explicit driver's reaction or structure of the crosswalk.Comment: 6 pages, 6 figure

IMPOSITION: Implicit Backdoor Attack through Scenario Injection

This paper presents a novel backdoor attack called IMPlicit BackdOor Attack through Scenario InjecTION (IMPOSITION) that does not require direct poisoning of the training data. Instead, the attack leverages a realistic scenario from the training data as a trigger to manipulate the model's output during inference. This type of attack is particularly dangerous as it is stealthy and difficult to detect. The paper focuses on the application of this attack in the context of Autonomous Driving (AD) systems, specifically targeting the trajectory prediction module. To implement the attack, we design a trigger mechanism that mimics a set of cloned behaviors in the driving scene, resulting in a scenario that triggers the attack. The experimental results demonstrate that IMPOSITION is effective in attacking trajectory prediction models while maintaining high performance in untargeted scenarios. Our proposed method highlights the growing importance of research on the trustworthiness of Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, particularly in safety-critical applications. Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to the safety and reliability of DNN models, and this paper presents a new perspective on backdooring DNNs. The proposed IMPOSITION paradigm and the demonstration of its severity in the context of AD systems are significant contributions of this paper. We highlight the impact of the proposed attacks via empirical studies showing how IMPOSITION can easily compromise the safety of AD systems

CRITERIA: a New Benchmarking Paradigm for Evaluating Trajectory Prediction Models for Autonomous Driving

Benchmarking is a common method for evaluating trajectory prediction models for autonomous driving. Existing benchmarks rely on datasets, which are biased towards more common scenarios, such as cruising, and distance-based metrics that are computed by averaging over all scenarios. Following such a regiment provides a little insight into the properties of the models both in terms of how well they can handle different scenarios and how admissible and diverse their outputs are. There exist a number of complementary metrics designed to measure the admissibility and diversity of trajectories, however, they suffer from biases, such as length of trajectories. In this paper, we propose a new benChmarking paRadIgm for evaluaTing trajEctoRy predIction Approaches (CRITERIA). Particularly, we propose 1) a method for extracting driving scenarios at varying levels of specificity according to the structure of the roads, models' performance, and data properties for fine-grained ranking of prediction models; 2) A set of new bias-free metrics for measuring diversity, by incorporating the characteristics of a given scenario, and admissibility, by considering the structure of roads and kinematic compliancy, motivated by real-world driving constraints. 3) Using the proposed benchmark, we conduct extensive experimentation on a representative set of the prediction models using the large scale Argoverse dataset. We show that the proposed benchmark can produce a more accurate ranking of the models and serve as a means of characterizing their behavior. We further present ablation studies to highlight contributions of different elements that are used to compute the proposed metrics