Carbon management Index under different land uses of Conoor region of Western ghats in Tamil Nadu

The increased land-use change (LUC) from native lands to other land use at the Conoor region of western ghats in Tamil Nadu has severely declined soil carbon concentration.  Therefore to quantify this decline, Carbon Management Index (CMI) was worked out under major land uses {(Forest (FOR), cropland (CRP), tea plantation (TEA)} using total organic carbon (TOC) and carbon pools under varying degrees of lability {a) NLC (non-labile carbon) b) VLC (very labile carbon) c) LC (labile carbon) d) LLC (less labile carbon)}. Results portray that the carbon pools were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in FOR than in TEA and CRP. The contribution of active pools {(very labile carbon (VLC) and labile carbon (LC)} towards TOC was higher in TEA and CRP, whereas in FOR, the passive pool {(less labile carbon (LLC) and non-labile carbon (NLC)} was higher. TOC (0-45 cm) was concentrated on the surface soils of FOR (32.88 g kg-1), CRP (11.87 g kg-1) and TEA (18.84 g kg-1) and it gradually declined with the increase in depth. The decline in TOC was maximum between 0 – 15 and 15 – 30 cm depth in CRP (30.62%) and FOR (22.17%), whereas it was maximum (37.16%) between 15 -30 and 30 -45 cm depth in TEA. Therefore, LUC spotlights the degradation of carbon pools and its extent was quantified using the carbon management index (CMI). The CMI (0 – 45 cm) recorded at CRP (12.93) and TEA (32.62) signals the need for an implementation of carbon management strategies at Conoor to keep the soils alive and protect biodiversity

Unravelling the carbon pools and carbon stocks under different land uses of Conoor region in Western Ghats of India

Land uses are pivotal in global carbon cycles. The native forest lands possess a greater potential to sequester higher carbon, which can directly address soil quality and climate change problems. Unfortunately, the rapid conversion of forests to other land use over the past few decades has significantly declined the concentration of carbon in the soils.  Therefore, in order to estimate the impact of land-use change (LUC)  on soil carbon status, this present study was attempted under major ecosystems (Forest (FOR), cropland (CRP), tea plantation (TEA)) of Conoor. Results from findings revealed that total organic carbon (TOC) concentration and carbon pools were significantly  (p<0.05) higher in FOR than in CRP and TEA.  TOC (0-45 cm) recorded in FOR, CRP and TEA was 32.88, 11.87 and 18.84 g kg-1 and it decreased along the depth increment. Carbon stock (t ha-1) in FOR, CRP and TEA (0-45cm) was 68.10, 26.04, 42.42. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was higher in FOR (283.08 mg kg-1) followed by TEA (94.64 mg kg-1) and CRP (76.22 mg kg-1). The microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) followed; FOR > TEA > CRP. These results clearly indicate that the LUC has inflicted a greater impact on soil carbon status and its extent was quantified using the land degradation index (LDI). The LDI (0-45 cm) recorded in CRP (-38.65) and TEA (-61.75) signals the need for immediate implementation of carbon management strategies in the CRP and TEA ecosystem to keep the soils of Conoor alive and prevent land degradation

Effect of different herbicide spray volumes on weed control efficiency of a battery-operated Unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.)

The effect of spray volume on weed control in transplanted rice ecosystems using the Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) needs to be better understood for management in the advancements of UAV-based spraying technology. The present study aimed to find out the influence of varied spray volumes of 15 L/ha, 20 L/ha and 25 L/ha using the UAV and 500 L/ha using a Knapsack sprayer (KS) to compare the weed density, weed dry matter and weed control efficiency and yield in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). Pre-emergence (PE) application of Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl at 25 g a.i./ha at three days after transplanting (DAT) and post-emergence (PoE) application of Bis-pyribac sodium at 25 g a.i./ha at 25 DAT were used as herbicide treatments. The results revealed that varied spray volumes significantly influenced the weed density, dry matter, and weed control efficiency of the UAV and KS. Application of herbicides using KS (500 L/ha) and UAV (25 L/ha) had better control on the weeds by reducing weed density and dry matter at 20, 40, and 60 DAT, with no significant difference. Higher grain yield and straw yield were recorded in KS (500 L/ha) and UAV (25 L/ha), with no significant difference. However, applying 25 L/ha had better weed control efficiency and higher yield, possibly due to optimum deposition. Considering the low volume application of UAV (25 L/ha) as compared with KS (500 L/ha), it is better to go for the optimal application of 25 L/ha, which is an energy-efficient and cost-effective, labour-saving approach compared to KS

Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Qualitative and Quantitative Digital Soil-Mapping Approaches for Eastern Districts of Tamil Nadu, India

The soil–environmental relationship identified and standardised over the years has expedited the growth of digital soil-mapping techniques; hence, various machine learning algorithms are involved in predicting soil attributes. Therefore, comparing the different machine learning algorithms is essential to provide insights into the performance of the different algorithms in predicting soil information for Indian landscapes. In this study, we compared a suite of six machine learning algorithms to predict quantitative (Cubist, decision tree, k-NN, multiple linear regression, random forest, support vector regression) and qualitative (C5.0, k-NN, multinomial logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, support vector machine) soil information separately at a regional level. The soil information, including the quantitative (pH, OC, and CEC) and qualitative (order, suborder, and great group) attributes, were extracted from the legacy soil maps using stratified random sampling procedures. A total of 4479 soil observations sampled were non-spatially partitioned and intersected with 39 environmental covariate parameters. The predicted maps depicted the complex soil–environmental relationships for the study area at a 30 m spatial resolution. The comparison was facilitated based on the evaluation metrics derived from the test datasets and visual interpretations of the predicted maps. Permutation feature importance analysis was utilised as the model-agnostic interpretation tool to determine the contribution of the covariate parameters to the model’s calibration. The R2 values for the pH, OC, and CEC ranged from 0.19 to 0.38; 0.04 to 0.13; and 0.14 to 0.40, whereas the RMSE values ranged from 0.75 to 0.86; 0.25 to 0.26; and 8.84 to 10.49, respectively. Irrespective of the algorithms, the overall accuracy percentages for the soil order, suborder, and great group class ranged from 31 to 67; 26 to 65; and 27 to 65, respectively. The tree-based ensemble random forest and rule-based tree models’ (Cubist and C5.0) algorithms efficiently predicted the soil properties spatially. However, the efficiency of the other models can be substantially increased by advocating additional parameterisation measures. The range and scale of the quantitative soil attributes, in addition to the sampling frequency and design, greatly influenced the model’s output. The comprehensive comparison of the algorithms can be utilised to support model selection and mapping at a varied scale. The derived digital soil maps will help farmers and policy makers to adopt precision information for making decisions at the farm level leading to productivity enhancements through the optimal use of nutrients and the sustainability of the agricultural ecosystem, ensuring food security

Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Crop Cover Classification Using Sentinel 2

Crop cover mapping is an essential tool for controlling and enhancing agricultural productivity. By determining the spatial distribution of different crop types, solidified judgements regarding crop planning, crop management, and risk management can be made. Crop cover classification using optical data pose constraints in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. With Sentinel – 2 data providing the ground information at 10m resolution, users may choose the best spectral band combinations and temporal frame by analysing the spectral-temporal information of different crops. The crop categorization map for the Kallakurichi and Villupuram districts were created in this study using the Random Forest (RF) and Decision tree (C5.0) classifiers. The study mainly focuses on comparing the classification accuracy of two classifiers and figuring out the best classifiers for crop cover mapping with respect to the study area. The ground truth information collected, were partitioned into calibration and validation datasets and the validation resulted with the Overall Accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient of 66%; 0.63 and 60%; 0.57 for RF and C5.0 algorithms, respectively. From the results, it could be concluded that the RF classifier performed comparatively better than C5.0, thus making it suitable for crop cover classification

Quantification of Biophysical Parameters and Economic Yield in Cotton and Rice Using Drone Technology

New agronomic opportunities for more informed agricultural decisions and enhanced crop management have been made possible by drone-based near-ground remote sensing. Obtaining precise non-destructive information regarding crop biophysical characteristics at spatial and temporal scales is now possible. Drone-mounted multispectral and thermal sensors were used to assess crop phenology, condition, and stress by profiling spectral vegetation indices in crop fields. In this study, vegetation indices, viz., Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI), Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index (MCARI), Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index (WDRVI), Normalized Red–Green Difference Index (NGRDI), Excess Green Index (ExG), Red–Green Blue Vegetation Index (RGBVI), and Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI) were generated. Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis showed a better correlation between WDRVI and VARI with LAI (R = 0.955 and R = 0.982) ground truth data. In contrast, a strong correlation (R = 0.931 and R = 0.844) was recorded with MCARI and NGRDI with SPAD chlorophyll ground truth data. Then, the best-performing indices, WDRVI and MCARI in cotton, and VARI and NGRDI in rice, were further used to generate the yield model. This study for determining LAI and chlorophyll shows that high spatial resolution drone imageries are accurate and fast. As a result, finding out the LAI and chlorophyll and how they affect crop yield at a regional scale is helpful. The widespread use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and yield prediction were technical components of large-scale precision agriculture

Spatial Rice Yield Estimation Using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, Semi-Physical Approach and Assimilating SAR Satellite Derived Products with DSSAT Crop Simulation Model

Accurate and consistent information on the area and production of field crops is vital for national and state planning and ensuring food security in India. Satellite-based remote sensing offers a suitable and cost-effective technique for regional- and national-scale crop monitoring. The use of remote sensing data for crop yield estimation has been demonstrated using a semi-physical approach with reasonable success. Assimilating remote sensing data with the DSSAT model and spectral indices-based regression analysis are promising methods for spatially estimating rice crop yields. Rice area and yield in the Cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu, India was estimated during samba (August–January) season in the years 2020–2021 using Sentinel 1A Synthetic Aperture Radar satellite data with three different spatial yield estimation methods, namely a spectral indices-based regression analysis, semi-physical approach, and integrating remote products with DSSAT crop growth model. A rice area map was generated for the study area using a rule-based classifier approach utilizing parameterization with a classification accuracy of 94.5% and a kappa score of 0.89. The total classified rice area in Cauvery Delta Region was 379,767 ha, and the Start of Season (SoS) maps for samba season revealed that the major planting period for rice was between 22 September and 9 November in 2020. The study also aimed to identify promising spatial yield estimation techniques for optimal rice yield prediction over large areas. Regression models resulted in rice yields of 3234 to 3905 kg ha−1 with a mean of 3654 kg ha−1. The net primary product was computed using the periodical PAR, fAPAR, Wstress, Tstress, and maximum radiation use efficiency in a semi-physical approach. The resultant rice yields ranged between 2652 and 3438 kg ha−1 with the mean of 3076 kg ha−1. During the integration of remote sensing products with crop growth models, LAI values were extracted from dB images and utilized to simulate rice yields in the range of 3684 to 4012 kg ha−1 with the mean of 3855 kg ha−1. When compared to the semi-physical approach, both integrating remote sensing products with the DSSAT crop growth model and spectral indices-based regression analysis had R2 greater than 0.80, NRMSE of less than 10%, and agreement of more than 90%, indicating that these two approaches could be used for spatial rice yield estimation

Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Qualitative and Quantitative Digital Soil-Mapping Approaches for Eastern Districts of Tamil Nadu, India

The soil–environmental relationship identified and standardised over the years has expedited the growth of digital soil-mapping techniques; hence, various machine learning algorithms are involved in predicting soil attributes. Therefore, comparing the different machine learning algorithms is essential to provide insights into the performance of the different algorithms in predicting soil information for Indian landscapes. In this study, we compared a suite of six machine learning algorithms to predict quantitative (Cubist, decision tree, k-NN, multiple linear regression, random forest, support vector regression) and qualitative (C5.0, k-NN, multinomial logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, support vector machine) soil information separately at a regional level. The soil information, including the quantitative (pH, OC, and CEC) and qualitative (order, suborder, and great group) attributes, were extracted from the legacy soil maps using stratified random sampling procedures. A total of 4479 soil observations sampled were non-spatially partitioned and intersected with 39 environmental covariate parameters. The predicted maps depicted the complex soil–environmental relationships for the study area at a 30 m spatial resolution. The comparison was facilitated based on the evaluation metrics derived from the test datasets and visual interpretations of the predicted maps. Permutation feature importance analysis was utilised as the model-agnostic interpretation tool to determine the contribution of the covariate parameters to the model’s calibration. The R2 values for the pH, OC, and CEC ranged from 0.19 to 0.38; 0.04 to 0.13; and 0.14 to 0.40, whereas the RMSE values ranged from 0.75 to 0.86; 0.25 to 0.26; and 8.84 to 10.49, respectively. Irrespective of the algorithms, the overall accuracy percentages for the soil order, suborder, and great group class ranged from 31 to 67; 26 to 65; and 27 to 65, respectively. The tree-based ensemble random forest and rule-based tree models’ (Cubist and C5.0) algorithms efficiently predicted the soil properties spatially. However, the efficiency of the other models can be substantially increased by advocating additional parameterisation measures. The range and scale of the quantitative soil attributes, in addition to the sampling frequency and design, greatly influenced the model’s output. The comprehensive comparison of the algorithms can be utilised to support model selection and mapping at a varied scale. The derived digital soil maps will help farmers and policy makers to adopt precision information for making decisions at the farm level leading to productivity enhancements through the optimal use of nutrients and the sustainability of the agricultural ecosystem, ensuring food security