Driving pressure during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery (DESIGNATION) : study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

Background Intraoperative driving pressure (Delta P) is associated with development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). When tidal volume (V-T) is kept constant, Delta P may change according to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced changes in lung aeration. Delta P may decrease if PEEP leads to a recruitment of collapsed lung tissue but will increase if PEEP mainly causes pulmonary overdistension. This study tests the hypothesis that individualized high PEEP, when compared to fixed low PEEP, protects against PPC in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. Methods The "Driving prESsure durIng GeNeral AnesThesIa for Open abdomiNal surgery trial" (DESIGNATION) is an international, multicenter, two-group, double-blind randomized clinical superiority trial. A total of 1468 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two intraoperative ventilation strategies. Investigators screen patients aged >= 18 years and with a body mass index <= 40 kg/m(2), scheduled for open abdominal surgery and at risk for PPC. Patients either receive an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers (RM) ("individualized high PEEP") or one in which PEEP of 5 cm H2O without RM is used ("low PEEP"). In the "individualized high PEEP" group, PEEP is set at the level at which Delta P is lowest. In both groups of the trial, V-T is kept at 8 mL/kg predicted body weight. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of PPC, recorded as a collapsed composite of adverse pulmonary events. Discussion DESIGNATION will be the first randomized clinical trial that is adequately powered to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RM versus fixed low PEEP without RM on the occurrence of PPC after open abdominal surgery. The results of DESIGNATION will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during open abdominal surgery

Morphine induces preconditioning via activation of mitochondrial KCa channels

PURPOSE: Mitochondrial calcium sensitive potassium (mK(Ca)) channels are involved in cardioprotection induced by ischemic preconditioning. In the present study we investigated whether morphine-induced preconditioning also involves activation of mK(Ca) channels. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts (six groups; each n = 8) underwent global ischemia for 30 min followed by a 60-min reperfusion. Control animals were not further treated. Morphine preconditioning (MPC) was initiated by two five-minute cycles of morphine 1 muM infusion with one five-minute washout and one final ten-minute washout period before ischemia. The mK(Ca) blocker, paxilline 1 muM, was administered, with and without morphine administration (MPC + Pax and Pax). As a positive control, we added an ischemic preconditioning group (IPC) alone and combined with paxilline (IPC + Pax). At the end of reperfusion, infarct sizes were determined by triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. RESULTS: Infarct size was (mean +/- SD) 45 +/- 9% of the area at risk in the Control group. The infarct size was less in the morphine or ischemic preconditioning groups (MPC: 23 +/- 8%, IPC: 20 +/- 5%; each P < 0.05 vs Control). Infarct size reduction was abolished by paxilline (MPC + Pax: 37 +/- 7%, P < 0.05 vs MPC and IPC + Pax: 36 +/- 6%, P < 0.05 vs IPC), whereas paxilline alone had no effect (Pax: 46 +/- 7%, not significantly different from Control). CONCLUSION: Cardioprotection by morphine-induced preconditioning is mediated by activation of mK(Ca) channel

Perioperative Cardioprotection: Clinical Implications

Perioperative cardioprotection aims to minimize the consequences of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. In isolated tissue and animal experiments, several treatments have been identified providing cardioprotection. Some of these strategies have been confirmed in clinical proof-of-concept studies. However, the final translation of cardioprotective strategies to really improve clinical outcome has been disappointing: large randomized controlled clinical trials mostly revealed inconclusive, neutral, or negative results. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence regarding clinical implications of perioperative cardioprotective therapies from an anesthesiological perspective, highlighting nonpharmacological as well as pharmacological strategies. We discuss reasons why translation of promising experimental results into clinical practice and outcome improvement is hampered by potential confounders and suggest future perspectives to overcome these limitations

Matrixmetalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: Immunhistochemical markers in the diagnosis of lethal myocardial infarctions?

Matrixmetalloproteinases (MMP) 2 and 9 as well as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) 1 were tested as markers of myocardial early ischemia/infarctions. Experiments with an animal model, the isolated Langendorff heart, and analysis of human tissue samples drawn during autopsies were performed. Results of the experiments with the Langendorff model implied that the detectable amount of the markers might increase early after the onset of ischemia, in less than one hour, under ideal conditions. The results of the examined human cases showed that MMP-2 is constantly detectable in human myocardial tissue with an increased amount in case of an infarction with longer survival times. MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were negative in control cases, distinct positive staining results were obtained mainly in cases of infarctions with longer survival times and only rarely in those with a short survival time. According to these results MMPs and TIMPs do not qualify as first choice markers of myocardial infarctions. As an interesting side finding in the Langendorff experiments, positive staining results for all three markers were seen in myocardial areas that were mechanically traumatized by ECG-electrodes or ligation of blood vessels. These findings make the markers interesting for forensic wound age estimation

The practice of postanesthesia visits – a questionnaire study

Background and objective: Regular postanesthesia visits allow the detection of anesthesia related complications and increase patient satisfaction. Consequently, the performance of postanesthesia visits has been recommended after certain types of anesthesia. However, no data is available concerning the current practice of postanesthesia visits. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate quantity, organization, contents, significance and problems of postanesthesia visits in Germany. Methods: For this prospective closed-design survey, a questionnaire, consisting of 13 questions, was designed and tested for objectivity, reliability and validity. Subsequently, 3955 registered anesthesiologists were contacted via email to answer this survey. Results: Return rate was 31.4%; 958 questionnaires were included in the study. Only a small portion of patients was estimated to receive a postanesthesia visit (median: 20.0%). In hospitals with a specific postanesthesia visit service, this number was significantly higher (median: 65.0%, p < 0.001) vs. no postanesthesia visit service. Postanesthesia visits usually lasted less than 5 minutes (60.0%), and were typically conducted on the day of surgery (48.0%), after regular working hours (55.0%). 38.0% of the respondents reported to detect perioperative complications intermittently during their visits. While 98.0% of all respondents believe that postanesthesia visits improve the quality of their own work, 86.0% of the participants complain a lack of time for this task. Conclusions: Our survey indicates that current working conditions prevent a regular postanesthesia visit routine. Considering the high appreciation of postanesthesia visits by anesthesiologists, as well as the relevant incidence of postoperative complications detected during these visits, it seems desirable to consider organizational improvements for postanesthesia care. Resumo: Justificativa e objetivo: As visitas regulares pós-anestesia (VPA) permitem detectar complicações relacionadas à anestesia e aumentar a satisfação do paciente. Portanto, a realização de VPA foi é recomendada após certos tipos de anestesia. Porém, não há dados disponíveis sobre a prática atual de VPA. Logo, este estudo foi projetado para investigar a quantidade, organização, conteúdo, significância e problemas da VPA na Alemanha. Método: Para esta pesquisa de natureza fechada e prospectiva, um questionário com 13 perguntas foi criado e testado para identificar a objetividade, confiabilidade e validade. Posteriormente, 3.955 anestesiologistas registrados foram contatados via e-mail para responder a essa pesquisa. Resultados: A taxa de retorno foi de 31,4%; 958 questionários foram incluídos no estudo. Apenas uma pequena parte dos pacientes foi designada para receber uma VPA (mediana: 20,0%). Em hospitais com serviço específico de VPA, esse número foi significativamente maior (mediana: 65,0%, p < 0,001) vs. ausência de serviço de VPA. As VPA normalmente duraram menos de 5 minutos (60,0%) e foram tipicamente conduzidas no dia da cirurgia (48,0%), após o turno normal de trabalho (55,0%). Dentre os que responderam o questionário, 38,0% relataram detectar complicações perioperatórias de forma intermitente durante as visitas. Enquanto 98,0% dos entrevistados acreditam que as VPA melhoram a qualidade de seu próprio trabalho, 86,0% se queixam de falta de tempo para essa tarefa. Conclusões: Nossa pesquisa indica que as condições atuais de trabalho impedem a realização rotineira de VPA. Considerando a alta valorização das VPA por anestesiologistas, bem como a incidência relevante de complicações no pós-operatório detectadas durante essas visitas, parece desejável considerar melhorias organizacionais para a assistência após a anestesia. Keywords: Postanesthesia visit, Anesthesia, Complication, Questionnaire, Palavras-chave: Visita pós-anestésica, Anestesia, Complicação, Questionári