Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 in Parkinson’s disease: evidence from a multi-center survey in Tuscany region

Background: If Parkinson’s Disease (PD) may represent a risk factor for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is debated and there are few data on the direct and indirect effects of this pandemic in PD patients. Objective: In the current study we evaluated the prevalence, mortality and case-fatality of COVID-19 in a PD cohort, also exploring possible risk factors. We also aimed to investigate the effect of lockdown on motor/non-motor symptoms in PD patients as well as their acceptability/accessibility to telemedicine. Method: A case-controlled survey about COVID-19 and other clinical features in PD patients living in Tuscany was conducted. In non-COVID-19 PD patients motor/non-motor symptoms subjective worsening during the lockdown as well as feasibility of telemedicine were explored. Results: Out of 740 PD patients interviewed, 7 (0.9%) were affected by COVID-19, with 0.13% mortality and 14% case-fatality. COVID-19 PD patients presented a higher presence of hypertension (p < 0.001) and diabetes (p = 0.049) compared to non-COVID-19. In non-COVID-19 PD population (n = 733) about 70% did not experience a subjective worsening of motor symptoms or mood, anxiety or insomnia. In our population 75.2% of patients was favorable to use technology to perform scheduled visits, however facilities for telemedicine were available only for 51.2% of cases. Conclusion: A higher prevalence of COVID-19 respect to prevalence in Tuscany and Italy was found in the PD population. Hypertension and diabetes, as for general population, were identified as risk factors for COVID-19 in PD. PD patients did not experience a subjective worsening of symptoms during lockdown period and they were also favorable to telemedicine, albeit we reported a reduced availability to perform it. © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

A Bayesian approach to Essential Tremor plus: A preliminary analysis of the TITAN cohort

Background: The construct of Essential Tremor plus (ET-plus) refers to patients who also have rest tremor and/or mild neurologic signs of unknown significance. It is unclear whether soft signs represent confounding factors or are useful in suspecting an alternative condition. Methods: Using a Bayesian approach to ET-plus patients recruited in The ITAlian tremor Network (TITAN), we analyzed the probability that these patients do not have ET. Results: The data of 274 ET-plus patients were extracted from the TITAN database. The majority of patients (240/274; 87.5%) had a single soft sign. The post-test probability of not having ET was different according to the specific soft sign: namely, 0.64 (rest tremor); 0.46 (questionable dystonia); 0.85 (questionable bradykinesia); 0.19 (soft gait impairment); and 0.09 (questionable cognitive issues). In patients with multiple soft signs, the post-test probability of not having ET was higher than 50% for 7 out of 11 combinations, accounting for 44.1% of subjects. Overall, the post-test probability of not having ET was higher than 50% in up to 71.5% of ET-plus patients. Discussion: We have here shown that: 1) the soft signs differently contribute in modulating the probability that a patient does not have ET; and 2) the effect of multiple soft signs are not always addictive. Future studies are needed to collect prevalence figures of soft signs in different neurological disorders as well as in the elderly and to calculate their value in predicting the development of an alternative tremor syndrome