Lidocaine response rate in aEEG-confirmed neonatal seizures : Retrospective study of 413 full-term and preterm infants

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the seizure response rate to lidocaine in a large cohort of infants who received lidocaine as second- or third-line antiepileptic drug (AED) for neonatal seizures. METHODS: Full-term (n = 319) and preterm (n = 94) infants, who received lidocaine for neonatal seizures confirmed on amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), were studied retrospectively (January 1992-December 2012). Based on aEEG findings, the response was defined as good (>4 h no seizures, no need for rescue medication); intermediate (0-2 h no seizures, but rescue medication needed after 2-4 h); or no clear response (rescue medication needed <2 h). RESULTS: Lidocaine had a good or intermediate effect in 71.4%. The response rate was significantly lower in preterm (55.3%) than in full-term infants (76.1%, p < 0.001). In full-term infants the response to lidocaine was significantly better than midazolam as second-line AED (21.4% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.049), and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED (67.6% vs. 57%, p = 0.086). Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line AED than as second-line AED (p < 0.001). Factors associated with a good response to lidocaine were the following: higher gestational age, longer time between start of first seizure and administration of lidocaine, lidocaine as third-line AED, use of new lidocaine regimens, diagnosis of stroke, use of digital aEEG, and hypothermia. Multivariable analysis of seizure response to lidocaine included lidocaine as second- or third-line AED and seizure etiology. SIGNIFICANCE: Seizure response to lidocaine was seen in ~70%. The response rate was influenced by gestational age, underlying etiology, and timing of administration. Lidocaine had a significantly higher response rate than midazolam as second-line AED, and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED. Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line compared to second-line AED, which could be due to a pharmacologic synergistic mechanism between the two drugs

Comparison between tape-recorded and amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring in sick newborn infants

In 15 ill newborn infants a comparison between long-term multichannel and single-channel recordings of simultaneously tape-recorded (Medilog system) and amplitude-integrated EEG (Cerebral Function Monitor) was made. There was good agreement between the main type of background activity diagnosed with the tape-recorded and the amplitude-integrated EEG for all recordings. Two infants had repetitive subclinical and subtle seizure activity, lasting for several hours, which was detected by both techniques. Short, single seizures were diagnosed in the recordings of nine infants. When a single electrographic seizure appeared in an otherwise stable recording, it was identified by both the tape-recorded and the amplitude-integrated EEG. Very short (5-30 s) seizure patterns, which were diagnosed with the tape-recorded EEG, were not identified in the cerebral function monitor recordings. In the single-channel recordings of both the EEG and the cerebral function monitor there were, on some occasions, difficulties in distinguishing single seizures from interference due to external artefacts. In the multichannel recordings the diagnosis of seizure patterns was facilitated by comparison with the other channels. Both the Medilog EEG and the cerebral function monitor are feasible techniques for following cerebral electrical activity in sick neonates, although neither technique is specifically constructed for this purpose. For clinical use in the neonatal intensive care unit the advantage with the cerebral function monitor is the immediately available recording. The tape-recorded EEG offers possibilities of more channels and a higher reliability when diagnosing short subclinical seizures, however, only after offline analysis

Assessment of pulmonary mechanics and breathing patterns during posturally induced glossoptosis in infants.

Respiratory mechanics were studied in nine infants with glossoptosis-apnoea syndrome to determine whether glossoptosis may account for signs of both inspiratory and expiratory airway obstruction. Airflow, oesophageal pressure, inspiratory and expiratory time (Ti and Te), and inspiratory and expiratory resistance (Ri and Re) were measured before and during ventilatory phases characterised by glossoptotic pharyngeal obstruction, induced by turning the infants onto their backs. In addition, an attempt was made to correlate the abnormalities in pulmonary mechanics with the clinical features. During partial glossoptotic pharyngeal obstruction, a significant increase was observed in Te and Re and variable changes in Ti and Ri. During severe obstruction, the infants displayed obstructed inspiratory efforts often associated with stridor, as well as obstructed expiratory efforts often associated with audible grunting and retarded expiratory flow pattern. The expiratory grunt was loudest over the neck and mimicked bronchospasm over the chest. These findings indicate that glossoptotic pharyngeal obstruction induces functional airway obstruction which may affect both inspiration and expiration. Expiratory airway obstruction seems, at least in part, to be due to active braking of expiratory flow