9 research outputs found

    ΠžΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ Ρ„Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ спСцифичСских ΠΈ нСспСцифичСских ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ рСспираторного Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π° Π² Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π±Π½Ρ‹Ρ… учрСТдСниях Бамарской области

    Get PDF
    Irrational administration of antimicrobials, incorrect regimens and dosing provide occurrence of adverse effects with minimal therapeutic results and development of drug resistance including anti-tuberculosis drugs. The study was designed to detect information sources on drug therapy used by general practitioners and TB specialists, to establish stereotypical models of antibacterial drug administration in prevalent upper and lower airway diseases at the Samara region and to substantiate the supposition about unreasonable empiric administration of anti-tuberculosis drugs in a respiratory patient without microbiological confirmation as a probable cause of drug resistant tuberculosis. A cross-sectional study based on a special questionnaire was performed in 425 general practitioners in primary care facilities, hospitals and in TB specialists at the Samara region. The questionnaire contained several clinical situations and their solving and the respondents should choose the most suitable ones. Results demonstrated that majority of the practitioners (80 %, or 340 / 425 cases) widely use advertising information regarding antimicrobials. Several doctors (1.7 %) chose antibacterial drugs to treat acute respiratory viral infection, 0.8 to 1.6 % of doctors certainly decided to administer anti-tuberculotics in non-TB respiratory diseases such as acute bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, communityacquired pneumonia and acute tonsillitis, and approximately one fifth of the practitioners thought to administer antituberculotics in these diseases (18.4 % (78 / 425) – rifampicin, 21.2 % (90 / 425) – isoniasid).ΠΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… срСдств ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ Π²Ρ‹Π±Ρ€Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ схСмы ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… эффСктов (ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ минимальном тСрапСвтичСском эффСктС) ΠΈ возникновСнию лСкарствСнной устойчивости ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ основных Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², Π² Ρ‚. Ρ‡. ΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ. Π’ Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΈ исслСдования Π²Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ источники ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ схСмам лСчСния, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹ΠΌ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ΠΉ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ сСти ΠΈ Ρ„Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ слуТбы, Π²Ρ‹ΡΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ стСрСотипныС ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ назначСния Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Π² Бамарской области для лСчСния Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ распространСнных Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π΄Ρ‹Ρ…Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ прСдпосылками возникновСния лСкарствСнной устойчивости ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΡΠ»ΡƒΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π±Π΅Π·Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ эмпиричСскоС Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠΈ Ρƒ больного симптомов рСспираторного заболСвания с Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ этиологиСй. ΠžΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС, Π² основС ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вопросника, Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ срСди 425 Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мСдицинского Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π°, Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ΅Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² стационаров ΠΈ Ρ„Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΡƒΡ‡Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Бамарской области. Вопросник содСрТал описаниС Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… клиничСских ситуаций, рСспондСнты Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ подходящиС для этих ситуаций ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ исслСдования ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ рСкламная информация ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², прСдоставляСмая фармацСвтичСскими компаниями, ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎ – Π² 80 % (340 / 425) случаСв – ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠΌ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ. НСбольшая Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ (1,7 %) Π²Ρ‹Π±Ρ€Π°Π»Π° Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² для лСчСния острого рСспираторного заболСвания; ΠΎΡ‚ 0,8 % Π΄ΠΎ 1,6 % Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ для лСчСния Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Ρ‹Ρ€Π΅Ρ… Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Ρ‹Ρ…Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ этиологии (острого Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ…ΠΈΡ‚Π°, хроничСской обструктивной Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ…, Π²Π½Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ острого Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½Π·ΠΈΠ»Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π°), ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ пятая Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Π΅Ρ‚ назначСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚ΡƒΠ±Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (18,4 %, (78 / 425) – Π ΠΈΡ„Π°ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½; 21,2 % (90 / 425) – Изониазид) ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ пСрСчислСнных Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ

    Not Available

    No full text
    Not AvailableTen okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) plants showing distinct yellow vein mosaic disease (YVMD) symptoms were collected from different fields in Karnataka State, India. The genomic DNA of the isolated viruses was amplified, cloned, and sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed that the DNA-A-like sequences of all ten isolates were identical. Sequence analysis of a representative virus isolate (OYSK2) with other begomovirus sequences available in GenBank showed β‰₯90% sequence identity with Bhendi yellow vein Maharashtra virus (BYVMaV; EU482411) and ≀89% homology with full-length Bhendi yellow vein mosaic virus (BYVMV) infecting okra on the Indian subcontinent. These results suggested that a new strain of BYVMaV was present in all ten samples collected from the field. A source of resistance to BYVMaV and naturally present virus isolates causing YVMD was identified by screening okra genotypes under artificial and natural inoculation conditions, respectively. None of the genotypes tested showed complete immunity to BYVMaV. However, the okra genotypes β€˜Tulasi’ and β€˜Trisha’ were only moderately susceptible under glasshouse and field conditions. The new begomovirus strain could be detected by dot-blot hybridisation using a non-radioactive DNA probe in the virus samples collected from both symptomless and symptomatic okra plants.Not Availabl

    Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential

    No full text
    corecore