Updates in Hospital Palliative Care

Background: This review critiques recent palliative care (PC) literature with likelihood of impacting general hospital practice in order to help address the PC needs of patients. Methods: Articles published between January and December 2018 were identified through hand-search of leading PC journals and MEDLINE search. The final ten selected articles were determined by consensus based on scientific rigor, relevance to general hospital medicine, and impact to practice. Results: Key findings include: Early PC interventions reduced healthcare costs; Prognostic awareness of surrogates of patients with advanced dementia was associated with reduced burdensome interventions; Care transitions, especially in the last 3 days of life, can be detrimental to caregivers' well-being and perceptions of care; Haloperidol was effective for treatment of nausea and vomiting without untoward effects; Antipsychotics did not improve delirium symptoms in hospitalized patients; A fan directed to the face improved dyspnea; Disparities in advance directive completion disappeared when equal opportunities were given; Improving communication with families of critically ill patients improved perceptions of patient-centered care; Communication-priming tools improved the quality and documentation of goals of care conversations; Discussing prognosis did not harm the patient-provider relationship. Conclusion: Recent PC research affirmed the importance of PC delivery to patients with life-limiting illness and provided important guidance to hospitalists on symptom management, advance care planning, and communication.Rachel D. Havyer (1*), Nauzley Abedini (2), Robert L. Jayes (3), Brenda Matti-Orozco (4), Daniel H. Pomerantz (5), Aziz A. Ansari (6); 1. Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic. 2. Division of Palliative Medicine, University of California San Francisco. 3. Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine and Palliative Medicine, Morristown Medical Center, Atlantic Health System. 5. Department of Medicine, Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital. 6. Division of Hospital Medicine, Loyola University Medical CenterIncludes bibliographical reference

Palliative care: An update for internists

All clinicians should maintain basic skills in general palliative care to help address the needs of patients and families. Because keeping up with the information provided by the growing palliative care literature can be challenging, we conducted a detailed search via Medline for palliative care articles published in 2020 in top peer-reviewed medical journals. Using a consensus-driven process of selection, we reviewed and summarized 11 articles to enhance knowledge of the practice-changing palliative care literature for general internists

Science of health care delivery milestones for undergraduate medical education

Abstract Background The changing healthcare landscape requires physicians to develop new knowledge and skills such as high-value care, systems improvement, population health, and team-based care, which together may be referred to as the Science of Health Care Delivery (SHCD). To engender public trust and confidence, educators must be able to meaningfully assess physicians’ abilities in SHCD. We aimed to develop a novel set of SHCD milestones based on published Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones that can be used by medical schools to assess medical students’ competence in SHCD. Methods We reviewed all ACGME milestones for 25 specialties available in September 2013. We used an iterative, qualitative process to group the ACGME milestones into SHCD content domains, from which SHCD milestones were derived. The SHCD milestones were categorized within the current ACGME core competencies and were also mapped to Association of American Medical Colleges’ Entrustable Professional Activities (AAMC EPAs). Results Fifteen SHCD sub-competencies and corresponding milestones are provided, grouped within ACGME core competencies and mapped to multiple AAMC EPAs. Conclusions This novel set of milestones, grounded within the existing ACGME competencies, defines fundamental expectations within SHCD that can be used and adapted by medical schools in the assessment of medical students in this emerging curricular area. These milestones provide a blueprint for SHCD content and assessment as ongoing revisions to milestones and curricula occur

Follow-up care for breast cancer survivors

Breast cancer survivorship guidelines recommend at least annual follow-up visits, yet the degree to which this occurs in clinical practice is uncertain. Claims data from a US commercial insurance database (OptumLabs) were used to identify women treated with curative intent surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer between 2006 and 2014. In 25 035 women, median follow-up was 3 years. In the second year after surgery, 9.6% of the patients did not visit a primary care provider, an oncologist, or a surgeon (guideline-nonadherent). The guideline-nonadherent proportion increased from 7.8% in women diagnosed in 2006 to 12.2% in those diagnosed in 2014 (two-sided Wald P < .001). During years 2-6, guideline-nonadherence was also associated with older age, nonwhite race, no radiation, no chemotherapy, no endocrine therapy, and increasing time after surgery. There is a substantial and increasing rate of inadequate follow-up among breast cancer survivors. This has the potential to impair outcomes