Discrimination against female candidates in 2016 congressional elections: the role of modern sexism in vote choice

This project will examine the effects of modern sexist attitudes on voting behavior in the 2016 House and Senate elections in which a man was running against a woman. This project contributes to existing literature on sexism, effects of candidate gender, and voting behavior, by looking at the role of sexism in lower federal elections in the context of having a female two party presidential candidate running in the general election. Using the 2016 American National Election Study (ANES) data, variables were coded to makeup a modern sexism battery, and controls were implemented to account for the female candidate’s party, her incumbency status, and the office she was running for. Additionally, control variables were added to account for voter age, party ID, gender (male), race (white), education level, income bracket, how many children they had living with them under 18, if they were married, and their religiosity. A modern sexism scale was created by way of an additive index of sexism based questions in the ANES dataset. First, an OLS regression analysis was run to determine which voter characteristic variables were related to higher levels of sexism. Next, regressions were run to examine the influence of sexism on voting for the female candidate—my main hypothesis—which there was supporting evidence for. For House elections, every point increase on the sexism scale is associated with a .9% decrease of probability of voting for the woman candidate. When it comes to voting for a female Senate candidate, there is a .7% probability decrease with every point increase on the sexism scale

Transcranial electric stimulation and cognitive training improves face perception

Recently, there has been much interest the effectiveness of cognitive training programmes across a variety of cognitive and perceptual domains. Some evidence suggests that combining training programmes with noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can enhance training gains, but to date this has only been examined in numerosity and arithmetic tasks. In this study, we examined whether tRNS modulated the effects of a face recognition training programme. Participants completed a face discrimination training task for an hour per day over five days. Each day, training was preceded by twenty minutes of active high frequency tRNS or sham stimulation, targeted at the posterior temporal cortices or the inferior frontal gyri (IFG). Participants who received active stimulation to the posterior temporal cortices showed significant improvement on a facial identity discrimination task (the Cambridge Face Perception Test) after training, whereas those receiving sham or IFG stimulation showed no performance change. There was no evidence of an effect of stimulation on a face memory task (the Cambridge Face Memory Test). These results suggest that tRNS can enhance the effectiveness of cognitive training programmes, but further work is needed to establish whether perceptual gains can be generalised to face memory

Characterising developmental prosopagnosia: What can subtypes tell us?

Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a heterogeneous condition. Some people fail to recognise faces due to problems with face perception (apperceptive subtype), whereas others show normal perception, but poor memory for faces (associative subtype). Furthermore, some (but not all) DPs report difficulties with other cognitive tasks, such as judging emotional expressions, navigation, and within-class object recognition. This study examined whether different subtypes of DP present with different cognitive profiles. We recruited a large group of DPs (N = 36) and control participants, and examined their performance on a range of cognitive and face-processing tasks. The DP group was split into subtypes using the Cambridge Face Perception Test (Duchaine, Germine, & Nakayama, 2007). Overall, differences between subtypes were minimal: both reported similar rates of problems with navigation and within-class object discrimination; both showed smaller inversion effects for faces than controls; neither showed a composite effect for faces; and neither showed impairments when asked to discriminate facial expression, age, and gender. However, the groups diverged when discriminating changes in facial features, spacing, and contours. Overall, our results suggest that different subtypes of DP may manifest in subtle ways. We will discuss how these differences may inform future research and training programmes for DPs

Enhanced matching of children's faces in 'Super-recognisers' but not high-contact controls

Face matching is notoriously error-prone, and some work suggests additional difficulty when matching the faces of children. It is possible that individuals with natural proficiencies in adult face matching (“super-recognisers” [SRs]) will also excel at the matching of children’s faces, although other work implicates facilitations in typical perceivers who have high levels of contact with young children (e.g., nursery teachers). This study compared the performance of both of these groups on adult and child face matching to a group of low-contact controls. High- and lowcontact control groups performed at a remarkably similar level in both tasks, whereas facilitations for adult and child face matching were observed in some (but not all) SRs. As a group, the SRs performed better in the adult compared with the child task, demonstrating an extended own-age bias compared with controls. These findings suggest that additional exposure to children’s faces does not assist the performance in a face matching task, and the mechanisms underpinning superior recognition of adult faces can also facilitate the child face recognition. Real-world security organisations should therefore seek individuals with general facilitations in face matching for both adult and child face matching tasks

Intranasal Inhalation of Oxytocin Improves Face Processing in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is characterised by a severe, lifelong impairment in face recognition. Little work has attempted to improve face processing in these individuals, but intriguingly, recent evidence suggests oxytocin can improve face processing in both healthy participants and individuals with autism. This study examined whether oxytocin could also improve face processing in individuals with DP. Ten adults with the condition and 10 matched controls were tested using a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind within-subject experimental design (AB-BA). Each participant took part in two testing sessions where they inhaled 24IU of oxytocin or placebo spray and completed two face processing tests: one assessing face memory and the other face perception. Results showed main effects of both participant group and treatment condition in both face processing tests, but the two did not interact. Specifically, the performance of DP participants was significantly lower than control performance under both oxytocin and placebo conditions, but oxytocin improved processing to a similar extent in both groups

Transcranial random noise stimulation and cognitive training improves face perception

Several studies have found that cognitive training can improve face recognition. However, the effects tend to be relatively small and short-lived. Recent research has found that non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can enhance and extend the effects of cognitive training in other domains, but this has not been examined for face recognition. In this study, we examined whether tRNS modulated the effects of a face recognition training program in people with typical face recognition abilities. Participants completed a face discrimination training task for one hour per day over fi ve days. Training was preceded by twenty minutes of active high frequency tRNS or sham stimulation to lateral occipitotemporal cortices. Participants completed a battery of face processing tasks assessing face memory (the Cambridge Face Memory Test, CFMT), face perception (the Cambridge Face Perception Test, CFPT), and patterns of eye-movements to faces (free-viewing of faces and social scenes); these took place before training, after training, and at a one-week follow-up session. Participants who received active stimulation showed signifi cant improvement on the CFPT following training, whereas those who received sham stimulation did not show any training gains. There was no improvement for inverted faces, and neither the active or sham stimulation group showed an improvement on the CFMT, or any change in eye-movement patterns. These results suggest that tRNS can enhance the effectiveness of face recognition training programmes, but further work is needed to establish whether perceptual gains can be generalised to memory

Guess who? Facial identity discrimination training improves face memory in typically developing children.

While vast individual differences in face recognition have been observed in adults, very little work has explored when these differences come online during development, their domain specificity, and their consistency across different aspects of face processing. These issues do not only have important theoretical implications for the cognitive and developmental psychological literatures, but may reveal critical windows of neuroplasticity for optimal remediation of face recognition impairments. Here, we describe the first formal remedial face training program that is suitable for children, modifying the popular game Guess Who. Eighty-one typical children Aged 4-11 years were randomly allocated to an experimental or active control training condition. Over 10 training sessions, experimental participants were required to discriminate between faces that differed in feature size or spacing across 10 levels of difficulty, whereas control participants continuously played the standard version of Guess Who within the same timeframe. Improvements in face memory but not face matching were observed in the experimental compared to the control group, but there were no gains on tests of object matching or memory. Face memory gains were maintained in a 1-month follow up, consistent across age, and larger for poorer perceivers. Thus, this study not only presents a promising means of improving face recognition skills in children, but also indicates a consistent period of plasticity that spans early childhood to preadolescence, implying early segregation of face versus object processing

Intact word processing in developmental prospagnosia

A wealth of evidence from behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging research supports the view that face recognition is reliant upon a domain-specific network that does not process words. In contrast, the recent many-to-many model of visual recognition posits that brain areas involved in word and face recognition are functionally integrated. Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is characterised by severe deficits in the recognition of faces, which the many-to-many model predicts should negatively affect word recognition. Alternatively, domain-specific accounts suggest that impairments in face and word processing need not go hand in hand. To test these possibilities, we ran a battery of 7 tasks examining word processing in a group of DP cases and controls. One of our prosopagnosia cases exhibited a severe reading impairment with delayed response times during reading aloud tasks, but not lexical decision tasks. Overall, however, we found no evidence of global word processing deficits in DP, consistent with a dissociation account for face and word processing

Face recognition improvements in adults and children with face recognition difficulties.

While there have been decades of clinical and theoretical interest in developmental and acquired face recognition difficulties, very little work has examined their remediation. Here, we report two studies that examined the efficacy of an existing face training programme in improving face-processing skills in adults and children with developmental face recognition impairments. The programme has only been trialled in typical children to date, where 2 weeks of perceptual training (modelled on an adapted version of the popular family game Guess Who?) resulted in face-specific improvements for memory but not perception after 2 weeks of training. In Study 1, we performed a randomized, parallel groups, placebo-controlled trial of the same programme in 20 adults with a pre-existing diagnosis of developmental prosopagnosia. Assessment tasks were administered immediately before and after training, and 2 weeks later. Face-specific gains in memory (but not perception) were observed in the experimental group and were greatest in those with the poorest face recognition skills at entry. These gains persisted 2 weeks after training ceased. In Study 2, a case-series approach was used to administer the experimental version of the training programme to four children who presented with difficulties in face recognition. Improvements in face memory were observed in three of the participants; while one also improved at face perception, there was mixed evidence for the face specificity of these gains. Together, these findings suggest plasticity in the human face recognition system through to at least mid-adulthood and also pave the way for longer-term implementations of the face training programme that will likely elicit greater gains in both adults and children