Drug Induced Steatohepatitis: An Uncommon Culprit of a Common Disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of liver disease in developed countries. Its frequency is increasing in the general population mostly due to the widespread occurrence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Although drugs and dietary supplements are viewed as a major cause of acute liver injury, drug induced steatosis and steatohepatitis are considered a rare form of drug induced liver injury (DILI). The complex mechanism leading to hepatic steatosis caused by commonly used drugs such as amiodarone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, valproic acid, glucocorticoids, and others is not fully understood. It relates not only to induction of the metabolic syndrome by some drugs but also to their impact on important molecular pathways including increased hepatocytes lipogenesis, decreased secretion of fatty acids, and interruption of mitochondrial -oxidation as well as altered expression of genes responsible for drug metabolism. Better familiarity with this type of liver injury is important for early recognition of drug hepatotoxicity and crucial for preventing severe forms of liver injury and cirrhosis. Moreover, understanding the mechanisms leading to drug induced hepatic steatosis may provide much needed clues to the mechanism and potential prevention of the more common form of metabolic steatohepatitis

Prevalence of Bleeding and Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

INTRODUCTION:  Hemorrhage and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are recognized complications of chronic liver disease (CLD), but their prevalence and risk factors in critically ill patients are uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with CLD nonelectively admitted to a specialist intensive care unit (ICU) determining the prevalence and timing of major bleeding and VTE (early, present on admission/diagnosed within 48 hours; later, diagnosed >48 hours post-ICU admission). Associations with baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics, multiorgan failure (MOF), blood product administration, and mortality were explored. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS:  Of 623 patients with median age 52, bleeding (>48 hours after admission) occurred in 87 (14%) patients. Bleeding was associated with greater illness severity and increased mortality. Gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 72% of events, secondary to portal hypertension in >90%. Procedure-related bleeding was uncommon. VTE occurred in 125 (20%) patients: early VTE in 80 (13%) and involving the portal vein in 85%. Later VTE affected 45 (7.2%) patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and nonalcoholic liver disease were independently associated with early VTE (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.5-5.2 and OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.4-3.9, respectively), and HCC, sepsis, and cryoprecipitate use with late VTE (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.11-5.43; OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.2-4.3; and OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.3-5.1). CONCLUSION:  VTE was prevalent on admission to critical care and less commonly developed later. Bleeding was associated with MOF and increased mortality. Severe MOF was not associated with an increased rate of VTE which was linked with HCC, and specific etiologies of CLD

Drug Induced Steatohepatitis: An Uncommon Culprit of a Common Disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of liver disease in developed countries. Its frequency is increasing in the general population mostly due to the widespread occurrence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Although drugs and dietary supplements are viewed as a major cause of acute liver injury, drug induced steatosis and steatohepatitis are considered a rare form of drug induced liver injury (DILI). The complex mechanism leading to hepatic steatosis caused by commonly used drugs such as amiodarone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, valproic acid, glucocorticoids, and others is not fully understood. It relates not only to induction of the metabolic syndrome by some drugs but also to their impact on important molecular pathways including increased hepatocytes lipogenesis, decreased secretion of fatty acids, and interruption of mitochondrial β-oxidation as well as altered expression of genes responsible for drug metabolism. Better familiarity with this type of liver injury is important for early recognition of drug hepatotoxicity and crucial for preventing severe forms of liver injury and cirrhosis. Moreover, understanding the mechanisms leading to drug induced hepatic steatosis may provide much needed clues to the mechanism and potential prevention of the more common form of metabolic steatohepatitis

Whole blood thrombin generation profiles of patients with cirrhosis explored with a near patient assay

Background and Aims Patients with cirrhosis have a rebalanced hemostasis, often with normal or elevated thrombin-generating (TG) capacity in plasma. Whole blood (WB) TG allows faster determination and, importantly, includes the influence of all circulating blood cells. We aimed to study the TG profile of patients with cirrhosis in WB and in platelet poor plasma. Methods Thrombin-generating capacity in WB and plasma were assessed with a near-patient WB-TG assay and the calibrated automated thrombinography assay, respectively. TG assays were tested in presence and absence of thrombomodulin. Conventional coagulation tests were also performed. Results Thirty-four patients with cirrhosis and twenty-two controls were analyzed. Compared with controls, patients had substantially deranged results in conventional coagulation tests. Comparable WB-TG capacity (endogenous thrombin potential until peak, ETPp) but significantly lower peak thrombin were found in patients, and these results persisted when thrombomodulin was present. TG of the patients was more resistant to thrombomodulin than controls in both WB and plasma, although the inhibitory effect of thrombomodulin was drastically weaker in WB than in plasma. The peak of WB-TG in patients correlated moderately with their hematocrit and platelet count. Significant correlations were found between TG results in WB and plasma. Conclusions The WB-TG assay shows a normal to hypocoagulable state in patients with cirrhosis with a decreased anticoagulant activity of TM compared to plasma-TG. The clinical value of this assay needs further validation

Clinical features and evolution of bacterial infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Bacterial infections can trigger the development of organ failure/s and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Different geographic variations in their bacteriology and clinical practices could lead to different epidemiology, phenotypes and outcomes of ACLF around the world. The aim of the study was to evaluate regional differences in bacterial infection-related ACLF in patients with cirrhosis admitted to hospital

Epidemiology and Effects of Bacterial Infections in Patients With Cirrhosis Worldwide

Bacterial infections are common and life-threatening in patients with cirrhosis. Little is known about the epidemiology of bacterial infections in different regions. We performed a multicenter prospective intercontinental study to assess the prevalence and outcomes of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with cirrhosis

Determinants of clinical response to empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial and fungal infections- Results from the ICA 'Global study' [EABCIR-Global Study]

BACKGROUND AND AIMSThe administration of an appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment is essential in cirrhosis and severe bacterial infections. We aimed to investigate the predictors of clinical response of empirical antibiotic treatment in a prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis and bacterial and fungal infections included in the International Club of Ascites(ICA) "Global Study".METHODSHospitalized patients with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infection were prospectively enrolled at 46 centers. Clinical response to antibiotic treatment was defined according to changes in markers of infection/inflammation, vital signs, improvement of organ failure, and results of cultures.RESULTSFrom October 2015 to September 2016, 1302 patients were included at 46 centres. A clinical response was achieved only 61% of cases. Independent predictors of lack of clinical response to empirical treatment were C-reactive protein (OR=1.16;95%CI=1.02-1.31),blood leukocyte count (OR=1.39;95%CI=1.09-1.77), serum albumin (OR=0.70;95%CI=0.55-0.88), nosocomial infections (OR=1.96;95%CI=1.20-2.38), pneumonia (OR=1.75;95%CI=1.22-2.53),and ineffective treatment according to antibiotic susceptibility test (OR=5.32;95%CI=3.47-8.57). Patients with lack of clinical response to first-line antibiotic treatment had a significantly lower resolution rate of infections (55%vs. 96%;p<0.001), a higher incidence of second infections (29%vs. 15%;p<0.001),shock (35%vs. 7%;p<0.001) and new organ failures (52%vs. 19%;p<0.001) than responders. Clinical response to empirical treatment was an independent predictor of 28-day survival (sHR=0.20;95%CI=0.14-0.27).CONCLUSIONFour out of 10 patients with cirrhosis do not respond to the first-line antibiotic therapy, leading to lower resolution of infections and higher mortality. Broader-spectrum antibiotics and strategies targeting systemic inflammation may improve prognosis in patients with high degree of inflammation, low serum albumin levels and severe liver impairment.LAY SUMMARYIn a large, hospitalized cohort of patients with cirrhosis and infection at 46 multinational sites, lack of clinical response to empirical antibiotics was noted in four out of each ten patients. The non-response varied according to the geographic area and prevalence of multidrug/extensively drug resistant organisms with lowest response noted in the Asian countries particularly the Indian subcontinent. Severe systemic inflammation, as indicated by high white cell count, serum C-reactive protein levels low serum albumin concentration, presence of pneumonia, nosocomial infection and ineffective treatment were independent predictors of lack of clinical response to empirical antibiotic regimens. Patients with non-response to empirical regimen had worse clinical outcomes and this was identified as an independent predictor of higher in-hospital and 28-day mortality. Additional care and novel antibiotic protocols are an unmet need in cirrhosis patients, especially those with higher degree of inflammation, lower serum albumin levels and more severe liver impairment

Location and allocation: inequity of access to liver transplantation for patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure in Europe

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for acute-on-chronic liver failure grade-3 (ACLF-3). This study examines whether and how this evidence translates into practice by analyzing the variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, listing strategies and LT activity for ACLF-3 patients across transplant centers in Europe. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU with ACLF-3, whether or not they were listed and/or transplanted with ACLF-3 between 2018 and 2019 were included across 20 transplantation centers. RESULTS: 351 patients with ACLF-3 were included: 33 had been listed prior to developing ACLF-3 and 318 had not been listed at the time of admission to the ICU. There was no correlation between the number of unlisted ACLF-3 patients admitted to the ICU and the number listed or transplanted whilst in ACLF-3 across centers. In contrast, there was a correlation between the number of patients listed and the number transplanted whilst in ACLF-3. 21% of patients who were listed whilst in ACLF-3 died on the waiting list or were delisted. The percentage of LT for ACLF-3 patients varied from 0%-29% of patients transplanted with decompensated cirrhosis across centers (average = 8%), with an I2 index of 68% (95% CI: 49%-80%), showing substantial heterogeneity among centers. The one-year survival for all patients with ACLF-3 was significantly higher in centers that listed and transplanted more ACLF-3 patients (>10 patients) than in centers that listed and transplanted fewer: respectively 36% vs. 20%, p = 0.012. CONCLUSION: Patients with ACLF-3 face inequity of access to LT across Europe. Wait-listing strategies for ACLF-3 patients influence their access to LT and, ultimately, their survival

Location and allocation: Inequity of access to liver transplantation for patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure in Europe

There is growing evidence that liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for acute-on-chronic liver failure grade-3 (ACLF-3). This study examines whether and how this evidence translates into practice by analyzing the variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, listing strategies, and LT activity for patients with ACLF-3 across transplantation centers in Europe. Consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU with ACLF-3, whether or not they were listed and/or transplanted with ACLF-3, between 2018 and 2019 were included across 20 transplantation centers. A total of 351 patients with ACLF-3 were included: 33 had been listed prior to developing ACLF-3 and 318 had not been listed at the time of admission to the ICU. There was no correlation between the number of unlisted patients with ACLF-3 admitted to the ICU and the number listed or transplanted while in ACLF-3 across centers. By contrast, there was a correlation between the number of patients listed and the number transplanted while in ACLF-3. About 21% of patients who were listed while in ACLF-3 died on the waiting list or were delisted. The percentage of LT for patients with ACLF-3 varied from 0% to 29% for those transplanted with decompensated cirrhosis across centers (average = 8%), with an I(2) index of 68% (95% confidence interval, 49%-80%), showing substantial heterogeneity among centers. The 1-year survival for all patients with ACLF-3 was significantly higher in centers that listed and transplanted more patients with ACLF-3 (>10 patients) than in centers that listed and transplanted fewer: 36% versus 20%, respectively (p = 0.012). Patients with ACLF-3 face inequity of access to LT across Europe. Waitlisting strategies for patients with ACLF-3 influence their access to LT and, ultimately, their survival