20 research outputs found

    Correlation of Parameters used to Estimate Monomer Conversion in a Light-cured Composite

    Full text link
    The sensitivities of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Knoop hardness, water sorption, and resin leaching were compared for their ability to distinguish differences between composite samples cured through different thicknesses of overlying resin. The method developed allowed samples of light-cured composite to be made with controlled conversion for parameter testing, and eliminated effects of resin lost to slurry during polishing or an increase in conversion as a result of heat generated during grinding. Sensitivity to differences was greatest and equal for FTIR spectroscopy and Knoop hardness, while resin leaching proved to have moderate sensitivity, and water sorption none. The ability of these parameters to predict monomer conversion as measured by FTIR spectroscopy was also determined. Knoop hardness proved the best conversion predictor, resin leaching the next best, and water sorption the worst. Water sorption values did not vary with changes in specimen conversion.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67029/2/10.1177_00220345880670060801.pd

    Standardization of Distance and Angulation of Light Curing Unit Tip Using Distometer

    No full text

    Silorane-and High Filled-based "lowshrinkage" Resin Composites: Shrinkage, Flexural Strength And Modulus

    No full text
    This study compared the volumetric shrinkage (VS), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) properties of the low-shrinkage resin composite Aelite LS (Bisco) to those of Filtek LS (3M ESPE) and two regular dimethacrylate-based resin composites, the microfilled Heliomolar (Ivoclar Vivadent) and the microhybrid Aelite Universal (Bisco). The composites (n = 5) were placed on the Teflon pedestal of a videoimaging device, and VS was recorded every minute for 5 min after 40 s of light exposure. For the FS and FM tests, resin discs (0.6 mm in thickness and 6.0 mm in diameter) were obtained (n = 12) and submitted to a piston-ring biaxial test in a universal testing machine. VS, FS, and FM data were submitted to two-way repeated measures and one-way ANOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (α= 5%). Filtek LS showed lower VS than did Aelite LS, which in turn showed lower shrinkage than did the other composites. Aelite Universal and Filtek LS exhibited higher FS than did Heliomolar and Aelite LS, both of which exhibited the highest FM. No significant difference in FM was noted between Filtek LS and Aelite Universal, while Heliomolar exhibited the lowest values. Aelite LS was not as effective as Filtek LS regarding shrinkage, although both lowshrinkage composites showed lower VS than did the other composites. Only Filtek LS exhibited FS and FM comparable to those of the regular microhybrid dimethacrylate-based resin composite.27297102Ferracane, J.L., Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict? (2013) Dent Mater., 29 (1), pp. 51-58. , JanPeutzfeldt, A., Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems (1997) Eur J Oral Sci., 105 (2), pp. 97-116. , AprNaoum, S.J., Ellakwa, A., Morgan, L., White, K., Martin, F.E., Lee, I.B., Polymerization profile analysis of resin composite dental restorative materials in real time (2012) J Dent., 40 (1), pp. 64-70. , JanLee, I.B., Cho, B.H., Son, H.H., Um, C.M., A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of light cured composites (2005) J Oral Rehabil., 32 (4), pp. 304-314. , AprFeilzer, A.J., De Gee, A.J., Davidson, C.L., Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations (1990) Dent Mater., 6 (3), pp. 167-171. , JulBoaro, L.C., Goncalves, F., Braga, R.R., Influence of the bonding substrate in dental composite polymerization stress testing (2010) Acta Biomater., 6 (2), pp. 547-551. , FebLee, M.R., Cho, B.H., Son, H.H., Um, C.M., Lee, I.B., Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration (2007) Dent Mater., 23 (3), pp. 288-295. , MarPalin, W.M., Fleming, G.J., Nathwani, H., Burke, F.J., Randall, R.C., In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites (2005) Dent Mater., 21 (4), pp. 324-335. , AprGaengler, P., Hoyer, I., Montag, R., Gaebler, P., Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations-a 10-year report (2004) J Oral Rehabil., 31 (10), pp. 991-1000. , OctFerracane, J.L., Resin composite--state of the art (2011) Dent Mater., 27 (1), pp. 29-38. , JanSilikas, N., Eliades, G., Watts, D.C., Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain (2000) Dent Mater., 16 (4), pp. 292-296. , JulKanca, J., Suh, B.I., Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins (1999) Am J Dent., 12 (3), pp. 107-112. , JunYap, A.U., Soh, M.S., Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives (2004) Oper Dent., 29 (2), pp. 182-187. , Mar-AprWeinmann, W., Thalacker, C., Guggenberger, R., Siloranes in dental composites (2005) Dent Mater., 21 (1), pp. 68-74. , JanMoraes, R.R., Garcia, J.W., Barros, M.D., Lewis, S.H., Pfeifer, C.S., Liu, J., Control of polymerization shrinkage and stress in nanogel-modified monomer and composite materials (2011) Dent Mater., 27 (6), pp. 509-519. , JunKleverlaan, C.J., Feilzer, A.J., Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites (2005) Dent Mater., 21 (12), pp. 1150-1157. , DecBoaro, L.C., Goncalves, F., Guimaraes, T.C., Ferracane, J.L., Versluis, A., Braga, R.R., Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites (2010) Dent Mater., 26 (12), pp. 1144-1150. , DecPapadogiannis, D., Tolidis, K., Lakes, R., Papadogiannis, Y., Viscoelastic properties of low-shrinking composite resins compared to packable composite resins (2011) Dent Mater J., 30 (3), pp. 350-357Leprince, J., Palin, W.M., Mullier, T., Devaux, J., Vreven, J., Leloup, G., Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types (2010) J Oral Rehabil., 37 (5), pp. 364-376. , May 1Sarrett, D.C., Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations (2005) Dent Mater., 21 (1), pp. 9-20. , JanIlie, N., Hickel, R., Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites (2009) Clin Oral Investig., 13 (4), pp. 427-438. , DecHtang, A., Ohsawa, M., Matsumoto, H., Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content (1995) Dent Mater., 11 (1), pp. 7-13. , JanSoderholm, K.J., Influence of silane treatment and filler fraction on thermal expansion of composite resins (1984) J Dent Res., 63 (11), pp. 1321-1326. , NovLloyd, C.H., Iannetta, R.V., The fracture toughness of dental composites.I. The development of strength and fracture toughness (1982) J Oral Rehabil, 9 (1), pp. 55-66. , JanCross, M., Douglas, W.H., Fields, R.P., The relationship between filler loading and particle size distribution in composite resin technology (1983) J Dent Res., 62 (7), pp. 850-852. , JulMasouras, K., Silikas, N., Watts, D.C., Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites (2008) Dent Mater., 24 (7), pp. 932-939. , JulLien, W., Vandewalle, K.S., Physical properties of a new siloranebased restorative system (2010) Dent Mater., 26 (4), pp. 337-344. , AprRueggeberg, F.A., Caughman, W.F., The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements (1993) Oper Dent., 18 (2), pp. 48-55. , Mar-Ap

    The effect of curing mode on extent of polymerization and microhardness of dual-cured, self-adhesive resin cements.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To compare the effect of curing mode (self- or light-cure) on the extent of polymerization (%EP1 as measured using differential scanning calorimetry, (DSC) and microhardness of two dual-cured, self-adhesive resin cements, using a conventional, dual-cured resin cement as control. METHODS: Small amounts of the commercial self-adhesive cements Maxcem and RelyX Unicem or Panavia F2.0 dual-cure resin based cement used as control were polymerized within the DSC chamber at 35 degrees C under a nitrogen atmosphere. 10 specimens were light-cured immediately (20 seconds, 600 mW/cm2) and left undisturbed for 2 hours and 10 additional specimens were left to self-cure in the dark for 2 hours. Following DSC treatment, microhardness of the specimens was measured (Vickers). For each test parameter, data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: %EP and microhardness of all cements were higher when the light-cure mode of dual-activation was used (P<0.05) instead of only self-curing. No significant difference in %EP was found between either self-adhesive cement or the control using either the light- or self-curing modes. In the light-activated mode, the conventional, dual-cure control cement demonstrated lower microhardness than the self-adhesive cements (P<0.05)

    Micromorphology of resin-dentin interfaces using one-bottle etch&rinse and self-etching adhesive systems on laser-treated dentin surfaces: a confocal laser scanning microscope analysis

    No full text
    This study evaluated the hybrid layer (HL) morphology created by three adhesive systems (AS) on dentin surfaces treated with Er:YAG laser using two irradiation parameters. Study Design: Occlusal flat dentin surfaces of 36 human third molars were assigned into nine groups (n=4) according to the following ASs: one bottle etch&rinse Single Bond Plus (3M ESPE), two-step Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray), and all-in-one S3 Bond (Kuraray) self-etching, which were labeled with rhodamine B or fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran and were applied to dentin surfaces that were irradiated with Er:YAG laser at either 120 (38.7 J/cm2) or 200 mJ/pulse (64.5 J/cm2), or were applied to untreated dentin surfaces (control group). The ASs were light-activated following MI and the bonded surfaces were restored with resin composite Z250 (3M ESPE). After 24 hours of storage in vegetable oil, the restored teeth were vertically, serially sectioned into 1-mm thick slabs, which had the adhesive interfaces analyzed with confocal laser microscope (CLSM - LSM 510 Meta). CLSM images were recorded in the fluorescent mode from three different regions along each bonded interface. Results: Non-uniform HL was created on laser-irradiated dentin surfaces regardless of laser irradiation protocol for all AS, while regular and uniform HL was observed in the control groups. "Stretch mark"-like red lines were found within the HL as a result of resin infiltration into dentin microfissures, which were predominantly observed in 200 mJ/pulse groups regardless of AS. Poor resin infiltration into peritubular dentin was observed in most regions of adhesive interfaces created by all ASs on laser-irradiated dentin, resulting in thin resin tags with neither funnelshaped morphology nor lateral resin projections. Conclusion: Laser irradiation of dentin surfaces at 120 or 200 mJ/pulse resulted in morphological changes in HL and resin tags for all ASs evaluated in the study.42766267

    Degree of conversion of Z250 composite determined by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: comparison of techniques, storage periods and photo-activation methods

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of the Z250 composite, using six photo-activation methods, two storage periods and two preparation techniques of the FTIR specimens (n = 3). For the KBr pellet technique, the composite was placed into a metallic mold and photo-activated as follows: continuous light, exponential light, intermittent light, stepped light, PAC and LED. The measurements were made after 24 h and 20 days. For the resin film technique, approximately 0.07 g of the composite was pressed between two polyester strips, photo-activated as above described and analyzed. The DC was calculated by the standard technique and submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 5%). Independently of the storage period and specimen preparation technique, there were no significant differences among photo-activation methods. No statistical difference was observed between the time periods used. The specimens analyzed under the KBr pellet technique presented higher DC values than those analyzed by the resin film technique
    corecore