Substrate binding and translocation of the serotonin transporter studied by docking and molecular dynamics simulations

The serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT) plays an important role in the termination of 5-HT-mediated neurotransmission by transporting 5-HT away from the synaptic cleft and into the presynaptic neuron. In addition, SERT is the main target for antidepressant drugs, including the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The three-dimensional (3D) structure of SERT has not yet been determined, and little is known about the molecular mechanisms of substrate binding and transport, though such information is very important for the development of new antidepressant drugs. In this study, a homology model of SERT was constructed based on the 3D structure of a prokaryotic homologous leucine transporter (LeuT) (PDB id: 2A65). Eleven tryptamine derivates (including 5-HT) and the SSRI (S)-citalopram were docked into the putative substrate binding site, and two possible binding modes of the ligands were found. To study the conformational effect that ligand binding may have on SERT, two SERT–5-HT and two SERT–(S)-citalopram complexes, as well as the SERT apo structure, were embedded in POPC lipid bilayers and comparative molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed. Our results show that 5-HT in the SERT–5-HTB complex induced larger conformational changes in the cytoplasmic parts of the transmembrane helices of SERT than any of the other ligands. Based on these results, we suggest that the formation and breakage of ionic interactions with amino acids in transmembrane helices 6 and 8 and intracellular loop 1 may be of importance for substrate translocation

How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps

The recent literature is replete with papers evaluating computational tools (often those operating on 3D structures) for their performance in a certain set of tasks. Most commonly these papers compare a number of docking tools for their performance in cognate re-docking (pose prediction) and/or virtual screening. Related papers have been published on ligand-based tools: pose prediction by conformer generators and virtual screening using a variety of ligand-based approaches. The reliability of these comparisons is critically affected by a number of factors usually ignored by the authors, including bias in the datasets used in virtual screening, the metrics used to assess performance in virtual screening and pose prediction and errors in crystal structures used

How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps

The recent literature is replete with papers evaluating computational tools (often those operating on 3D structures) for their performance in a certain set of tasks. Most commonly these papers compare a number of docking tools for their performance in cognate re-docking (pose prediction) and/or virtual screening. Related papers have been published on ligand-based tools: pose prediction by conformer generators and virtual screening using a variety of ligand-based approaches. The reliability of these comparisons is critically affected by a number of factors usually ignored by the authors, including bias in the datasets used in virtual screening, the metrics used to assess performance in virtual screening and pose prediction and errors in crystal structures used

Structural immunoinformatics : understanding MHC-Peptide-TR binding

Adaptive immune responses are governed by major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) binding to specific short antigenic peptides and then this peptide bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) being recognized by the T cell receptor (TR) which activates the T cells. The use of critical sequence-structure-function information to understand the principles underlying MHC specific peptide binding is well established and the focus is now on understanding TR recognition of pMHC complexes. Three-dimensional X-ray structures of pMHC complexes bound to the TR that are today characterized in good numbers facilitate structural analysis further. It is thus possible to predict potential T cell epitopes for vaccine design by utilizing information derived from available experimental structures which offer an alternative to sequence-based approaches that require large dataset for training. In this chapter, we introduce the use of structural data, a comparative modeling and docking protocol for epitope prediction for specific MHC alleles and also compare the results of our experiments on different disease-specific alleles. We also talk about the possibilities of predicting how well a pMHC complex can bind to the TR.17 page(s