58 research outputs found

    Evaluation of machine-learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening

    Get PDF
    Machine-learning methods can be used for virtual screening by analysing the structural characteristics of molecules of known (in)activity, and we here discuss the use of kernel discrimination and naive Bayesian classifier (NBC) methods for this purpose. We report a kernel method that allows the processing of molecules represented by binary, integer and real-valued descriptors, and show that it is little different in screening performance from a previously described kernel that had been developed specifically for the analysis of binary fingerprint representations of molecular structure. We then evaluate the performance of an NBC when the training-set contains only a very few active molecules. In such cases, a simpler approach based on group fusion would appear to provide superior screening performance, especially when structurally heterogeneous datasets are to be processed

    A novel fragment derived from the β chain of human fibrinogen, β43–63, is a potent inhibitor of activated endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo

    Get PDF
    Background: Angiogenesis and haemostasis are closely linked within tumours with many haemostatic proteins regulating tumour angiogenesis. Indeed we previously identified a fragment of human fibrinogen, fibrinogen E-fragment (FgnE) with potent anti-angiogenic properties in vitro and cytotoxic effects on tumour vessels in vivo. We therefore investigated which region of FgnE was mediating vessel cytotoxicity. Methods: Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) were used to test the efficacy of peptides derived from FgnE on proliferation, migration, differentiation, apoptosis and adhesion before testing the efficacy of an active peptide on tumour vasculature in vivo. Results: We identified a 20-amino-acid peptide derived from the β chain of FgnE, β43–63, which had no effect on EC proliferation or migration but markedly inhibited the ability of activated ECs to form tubules or to adhere to various constituents of the extracellular matrix – collagen IV, fibronectin and vitronectin. Furthermore, our data show that β43–63 interacts with ECs, in part, by binding to αvβ3, so soluble αvβ3 abrogated β43–63 inhibition of tubule formation by activated ECs. Finally, when injected into mice bearing tumour xenografts, β43–63 inhibited tumour vascularisation and induced formation of significant tumour necrosis. Conclusions: Taken together, these data suggest that β43–63 is a novel anti-tumour peptide whose anti-angiogenic effects are mediated by αvβ3

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

    Get PDF
    In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field
    corecore