Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of how Motor Imagery and conventional therapy (physiotherapy or occupational therapy) compare to conventional therapy only in their effects on clinically relevant outcomes during rehabilitation of persons with stroke. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature METHODS: We conducted an electronic database search in seven databases in August 2005 and also hand-searched the bibliographies of studies that we selected for the review.Two reviewers independently screened and selected all randomized controlled trials that compare the effects of conventional therapy plus Motor Imagery to those of only conventional therapy on stroke patients.The outcome measurements were: Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment upper extremity score (66 points) and Action Research Arm Test upper extremity score (57 points).Due to the high variability in the outcomes, we could not pool the data statistically. RESULTS: We identified four randomized controlled trials from Asia and North America. The quality of the included studies was poor to moderate. Two different Motor imagery techniques were used (three studies used audiotapes and one study had occupational therapists apply the intervention). Two studies found significant effects of Motor Imagery in the Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment: Differences between groups amounted to 11.0 (1.0 to 21.0) and 3.2 (-4 to 10.3) respectively and in the Action Research Arm Test 6.1 (-6.2 to 18.4) and 15.8 (0.5 to 31.0) respectively. One study did not find a significant effect in the Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment and Color trail Test (p = 0.28) but in the task-related outcomes (p > 0.001). CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that Motor imagery provides additional benefits to conventional physiotherapy or occupational therapy. However, larger and methodologically sounder studies should be conducted to assess the benefits of Motor imagery

Risk of benign meningioma after childhood cancer in the DCOG-LATER cohort:contributions of radiation dose, exposed cranial volume, and age

Pediatric cranial radiotherapy (CrRT) markedly increases risk of meningiomas. We studied meningioma risk factors with emphasis on independent and joint effects of CrRT dose, exposed cranial volume, exposure age, and chemotherapy. The Dutch Cancer Oncology GroupLong-Term Effects after Childhood Cancer (DCOG-LATER) cohort includes 5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) whose cancers were diagnosed in 19632001. Histologically confirmed benign meningiomas were identified from the population-based Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA; 19902015). We calculated cumulative meningioma incidence and used multivariable Cox regression and linear excess relative risk (ERR) modeling. Among 5843 CCSs (median follow-up: 23.3 y, range: 5.052.2 y), 97 developed a benign meningioma, including 80 after full- and 14 after partial-volume CrRT. Compared with CrRT doses of 119 Gy, no CrRT was associated with a low meningioma risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.010.15), while increased risks were observed for CrRT doses of 2039 Gy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.833.33) and 40+ Gy (HR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.306.08). CCSs whose cancers were diagnosed before age 5 versus 1017 years showed significantly increased risks (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.394.07). In this dose-adjusted model, volume was not significantly associated with increased risk (HR full vs partial = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.863.22). Overall, the ERR/Gy was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.03unknown). Dose effects did not vary significantly according to exposure age or CrRT volume. Cumulative incidence after any CrRT was 12.4% (95% CI: 9.8%15.2%) 40 years after primary cancer diagnosis. Among chemotherapy agents (including methotrexate and cisplatin), only carboplatin (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.627.78) appeared associated with meningioma risk. However, we saw no carboplatin dose-response and all 9 exposed cases had high-dose CrRT. After CrRT 1 in 8 survivors developed late meningioma by age 40 years, associated with radiation dose and exposure age, relevant for future treatment protocols and awareness among survivors and physicians

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Histologically Confirmed Solid Benign Tumors Among Long-term Survivors of Childhood Cancer

Diabetes mellitus: pathophysiological changes and therap

Risk of benign meningioma after childhood cancer in the DCOG-LATER cohort: contributions of radiation dose, exposed cranial volume, and age

Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Risk of benign meningioma after childhood cancer in the DCOG-LATER cohort: Contributions of radiation dose, exposed cranial volume, and age

Background. Pediatric cranial radiotherapy (CrRT) markedly increases risk of meningiomas. We studied meningioma risk factors with emphasis on independent and joint effects of CrRT dose, exposed cranial volume, exposure age, and chemotherapy. Methods. The Dutch Cancer Oncology Group-Long-Term Effects after Childhood Cancer (DCOG-LATER) cohort includes 5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) whose cancers were diagnosed in 1963-2001. Histologically confirmed benign meningiomas were identified from the population-based Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA; 1990-2015). We calculated cumulative meningioma incidence and used multivariable Cox regression and linear excess relative risk (ERR) modeling. Results. Among 5843 CCSs (median follow-up: 23.3 y, range: 5.0-52.2 y), 97 developed a benign meningioma, including 80 after full- and 14 after partial-volume CrRT. Compared with CrRT doses of 1-19 Gy, no CrRT was associated with a low meningioma risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15), while increased risks were observed for CrRT doses of 20-39 Gy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.83-3.33) and 40+ Gy (HR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.30-6.08). CCSs whose cancers were diagnosed before age 5 versus 10-17 years showed significantly increased risks (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.39-4.07). In this dose-adjusted model, volume was not significantly associated with increased risk (HR full vs partial = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.86-3.22). Overall, the ERR/Gy was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.03-unknown). Dose effects did not vary significantly according to exposure age or CrRT volume. Cumulative incidence after any CrRT was 12.4% (95% CI: 9.8%-15.2%) 40 years after primary cancer diagnosis. Among chemotherapy agents (including methotrexate and cisplatin), only carboplatin (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.62-7.78) appeared associated with meningioma risk. However, we saw no carboplatin dose-response and all 9 exposed cases had high-dose CrRT. Conclusion. After CrRT 1 in 8 survivors developed late meningioma by age 40 years, associated with radiation dose and exposure age, relevant for future treatment protocols and awareness among survivors and physicians

Accuracy of Detecting Residual Disease After Cross Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer (preSANO Trial): Rationale and Protocol

Results from the recent CROSS trial showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) significantly increased survival as compared to surgery alone in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Furthermore, in the nCRT arm 49% of patients with a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 23% of patients with an adenocarcinoma (AC) had a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. These results provide a rationale to reconsider and study the timing and necessity of esophagectomy in (all) patients after application of the CROSS regimen. We propose a "surgery as needed" approach after completion of nCRT. In this approach, patients will undergo active surveillance after completion of nCRT. Surgical resection would be offered only to those patients in whom residual disease or a locoregional recurrence is highly suspected or proven. However, before a surgery as needed approach in oesophageal cancer patients (SANO) can be tested in a randomized controlled trial, we aim to determine the accuracy of detecting the presence or absence of residual disease after nCRT (preSANO trial). This study is set up as a prospective, single arm, multicenter, diagnostic trial. Operable patients with potentially curable SCC or AC of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction will be included. Approximately 4-6 weeks after completion of nCRT all included patients will undergo a first clinical response evaluation (CRE-I) including endoscopy with (random) conventional mucosal biopsies of the primary tumor site and of any other suspected lesions in the esophagus and radial endo-ultrasonography (EUS) for measurement of tumor thickness and area. Patients in whom no locoregional or disseminated disease can be proven by cytohistology will be offered a postponed surgical resection 6-8 weeks after CRE-I (ie, approximately 12-14 weeks after completion of nCRT). In the week preceding the postponed surgical resection, a second clinical response evaluation (CRE-II) will be planned that will include a whole body PET-CT, followed again by endoscopy with (random) conventional mucosal biopsies of the primary tumor site and any other suspected lesions in the esophagus, radial EUS for measurement of tumor thickness and area, and linear EUS plus fine needle aspiration of PET-positive lesions and/or suspected lymph nodes. The main study parameter is the correlation between the clinical response assessment during CRE-I and CRE-II and the final pathological response in the resection specimen. The first patient was enrolled on July 23, 2013, and results are expected in January 2016. If this preSANO trial shows that the presence or absence of residual tumor can be predicted reliably 6 or 12 weeks after completion of nCRT, a randomized trial comparing nCRT plus standard surgery versus chemoradiotherapy plus "surgery as needed" will be conducted (SANO trial). Netherlands Trial Register: NTR4834; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4834 (archived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ze7mn67B