121 research outputs found

    The p75 neurotrophin receptor is expressed by adult mouse dentate progenitor cells and regulates neuronal and non-neuronal cell genesis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to regulate neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus will require further identification and characterization of the receptors regulating this process. <it>In vitro </it>and <it>in vivo </it>studies have demonstrated that neurotrophins and the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75<sup>NTR</sup>) can promote neurogenesis; therefore we tested the hypothesis that p75<sup>NTR </sup>is expressed by adult dentate gyrus progenitor cells and is required for their proliferation and differentiation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In a first series of studies focusing on proliferation, mice received a single BrdU injection and were sacrificed 2, 10 and 48 hours later. Proliferating, BrdU-positive cells were found to express p75<sup>NTR</sup>. In a second series of studies, BrdU was administered by six daily injections and mice were sacrificed 1 day later. Dentate gyrus sections demonstrated a large proportion of BrdU/p75<sup>NTR </sup>co-expressing cells expressing either the NeuN neuronal or GFAP glial marker, indicating that p75<sup>NTR </sup>expression persists at least until early stages of maturation. In p75<sup>NTR </sup>(-/-) mice, there was a 59% decrease in the number of BrdU-positive cells, with decreases in the number of BrdU cells co-labeled with NeuN, GFAP or neither marker of 35%, 60% and 64%, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings demonstrate that p75<sup>NTR </sup>is expressed by adult dentate progenitor cells and point to p75<sup>NTR </sup>as an important receptor promoting the proliferation and/or early maturation of not only neural, but also glial and other cell types.</p

    Divergence in transcriptional and regulatory responses to mating in male and female fruitflies

    Get PDF
    Mating induces extensive physiological, biochemical and behavioural changes in female animals of many taxa. In contrast, the overall phenotypic and transcriptomic consequences of mating for males, hence how they might differ from those of females, are poorly described. Post mating responses in each sex are rapidly initiated, predicting the existence of regulatory mechanisms in addition to transcriptional responses involving de novo gene expression. That post mating responses appear different for each sex also predicts that the genome-wide signatures of mating should show evidence of sex-specific specialisation. In this study, we used high resolution RNA sequencing to provide the first direct comparisons of the transcriptomic responses of male and female Drosophila to mating, and the first comparison of mating-responsive miRNAs in both sexes in any species. As predicted, the results revealed the existence of sex- and body part-specific mRNA and miRNA expression profiles. More genes were differentially expressed in the female head-thorax than the abdomen following mating, whereas the opposite was true in males. Indeed, the transcriptional profile of male head-thorax tissue was largely unaffected by mating, and no differentially expressed genes were detected at the most stringent significance threshold. A subset of ribosomal genes in females were differentially expressed in both body parts, but in opposite directions, consistent with the existence of body part-specific resource allocation switching. Novel, mating-responsive miRNAs in each sex were also identified, and a miRNA-mRNA interactions analysis revealed putative targets among mating-responsive genes. We show that the structure of genome-wide responses by each sex to mating is strongly divergent, and provide new insights into how shared genomes can achieve characteristic distinctiveness
    corecore