Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study

Background While different proposals exist for a guideline on reporting Delphi studies, none of them has yet established itself in the health and social sciences and across the range of Delphi variants. This seems critical because empirical studies demonstrate a diversity of modifications in the conduction of Delphi studies and sometimes even errors in the reporting. The aim of the present study is to close this gap and formulate a general reporting guideline. Method In an international Delphi procedure, Delphi experts were surveyed online in three rounds to find consensus on a reporting guideline for Delphi studies in the health and social sciences. The respondents were selected via publications of Delphi studies. The preliminary reporting guideline, containing 65 items on five topics and presented for evaluation, had been developed based on a systematic review of the practice of Delphi studies and a systematic review of existing reporting guidelines for Delphi studies. Starting in the second Delphi round, the experts received feedback in the form of mean values, measures of dispersion, a summary of the open-ended responses and their own response in the previous round. The final draft of the reporting guideline contains the items on which at least 75% of the respondents agreed by assigning scale points 6 and 7 on a 7-point Likert scale. Results 1,072 experts were invited to participate. A total of 91 experts completed the first Delphi round, 69 experts the second round, and 56 experts the third round. Of the 65 items in the first draft of the reporting guideline, consensus was ultimately reached for 38 items addressing the five topics: Title and Abstract (n = 3), Context (n = 7), Method (n = 20), Results (n = 4) and Discussion (n = 4). Items focusing on theoretical research and on dissemination were either rejected or remained subjects of dissent. Discussion We assume a high level of acceptance and interdisciplinary suitability regarding the reporting guideline presented here and referred to as the "Delphi studies in social and health sciences–recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting" (DELPHISTAR). Use of this reporting guideline can substantially improve the ability to compare and evaluate Delphi studies

Effect of concomitant usage of alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy for M1 middle cerebral artery occlusion on clinical outcome: a retrospective analysis of 457 patients from two centers

IntroductionEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and concomitant usage of intravenous alteplase (alteplase) in large vessel occlusion stroke may produce unwanted excess intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Whether this applies specifically to isolated occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is unknown.MethodsA retrospective study from two tertiary thrombectomy centers. ICH was determined according to Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC). Factors associated with the occurrence of ICH in EVT alone vs. EVT with alteplase were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Factors related to the clinical outcome as determined with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) were investigated with univariate and adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis. The interaction between clinical variables and the usage of alteplase on the occurrence of ICH was evaluated.ResultsAny ICH occurred in 156/457 (34.1%) patients Class 1a bleeding in 37 (8.1%), type 2 in 45 (9.8%) Class 1c in 22 (4.8%), Class 2 in 25 (5.5%), and Class 3 (extraparenchymal) in 27 (5.9%). ICH occurred in similar frequency between alteplase-treated patients vs. EVT alone (85/262 [32%] vs. 71/195 [36%]; OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.81–1.76). After adjustment, odds for clinical outcome were lower in ICH patients (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25–0.74]), p = 0.002). Higher ICH rate was associated with more EVT steps (p for interaction −0.005), and usage of only stent-retriever (p for interaction =0.005).ConclusionUtilization of alteplase alongside EVT for MCA M1 occlusion did not result in excessive ICH occurrences or clinical deterioration

Defining Recrutainment: A Model and a Survey on the Gamification of Recruiting and Human Resources

Recrutainment, is a hybrid word combining recruiting and entertainment. It describes the combination of activities in human resources and gamification. Concepts and methods from game design are now used to assess and select future employees. Beyond this area, recrutainment is also applied for internal processes like professional development or even marketing campaigns. This paper’s contribution has four components: (1) we provide a conceptual background, leading to a more precise definition of recrutainment; (2) we develop a new model for analyzing solutions in recrutainment; (3) we present a corpus of 42 applications and use the new model to assess their strengths and potentials; (4) we provide a bird’s eye view on the state of the art in recrutainment and show the current weighting of gamification and recruiting aspects

Data_Sheet_1_Effect of concomitant usage of alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy for M1 middle cerebral artery occlusion on clinical outcome: a retrospective analysis of 457 patients from two centers.pdf

IntroductionEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and concomitant usage of intravenous alteplase (alteplase) in large vessel occlusion stroke may produce unwanted excess intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Whether this applies specifically to isolated occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is unknown.MethodsA retrospective study from two tertiary thrombectomy centers. ICH was determined according to Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC). Factors associated with the occurrence of ICH in EVT alone vs. EVT with alteplase were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Factors related to the clinical outcome as determined with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) were investigated with univariate and adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis. The interaction between clinical variables and the usage of alteplase on the occurrence of ICH was evaluated.ResultsAny ICH occurred in 156/457 (34.1%) patients Class 1a bleeding in 37 (8.1%), type 2 in 45 (9.8%) Class 1c in 22 (4.8%), Class 2 in 25 (5.5%), and Class 3 (extraparenchymal) in 27 (5.9%). ICH occurred in similar frequency between alteplase-treated patients vs. EVT alone (85/262 [32%] vs. 71/195 [36%]; OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.81–1.76). After adjustment, odds for clinical outcome were lower in ICH patients (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25–0.74]), p = 0.002). Higher ICH rate was associated with more EVT steps (p for interaction −0.005), and usage of only stent-retriever (p for interaction =0.005).ConclusionUtilization of alteplase alongside EVT for MCA M1 occlusion did not result in excessive ICH occurrences or clinical deterioration.</p