47 research outputs found
Gaze following ability in children 5, 10 and 15 months old
Joint attention is attention to an external object shared between two persons. The joint attention mechanism plays an important role in early cognitive, social and emotional development. Therefore, impairments of joint attention development can trigger different psychic disorders. The simplest form of joint attentional behavior is gaze following. The literature on the development of gaze following in children indicates that there is a great deal of variance regarding the age of emergence and development of this skill. This study aims to examine the age dynamics of the gaze following skill in infants and to establish more precisely the age at which this skill emerges. This comparative study of gaze following ability of infants at the age of 5, 10 and 15 months was conducted in Yekaterinburg at the Laboratory of the Brain and Neurocognitive Development, Ural Federal University. Gaze following ability was measured by the eye tracker task βGaze followingβ. Significant differences were found between the proportion of tasks with first gaze to a congruent object performed by 5 and 10 month old children and between 10 and 15 month old children. Furthermore, there was a significant difference of fixation duration on a congruent object between 10 and 15 month old children. The results reveal that the gaze following ability emerges in children already by the age of 5 months, develops significantly by 10 months, and develops almost completely by 15 months. Β© E. R. VALIEVA, A. I. KOTYUSOVRussian Science Foundation,Β RSF: 16-18-10371Acknowledgements. This work was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation no. 16-18-10371. We thank the staff of the Laboratory of Brain and Neurocognitive Development for the opportunity to conduct this study and for their help in carrying it out
Π’ΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°
Β The conducted analysis of Russian and foreign literature sources showed that the problem of diagnostics and treatment of polytrauma in elderly and senile patients is still relevant. The main discussion point is the highΒ mortality rate in this group of patients. Although at this level of theΒ medicineβs evolution, an active approach to the treatment offered to such patients is applicable, the mortality rate in this group of patients remains much higher than in the group of patients under 65. The priority here is to study the difficulties of diagnosing injuries in elderly and senile patients withΒ polytrauma. Also, a fundamental issue is the development of an effective algorithm for the surgical treatment of injuries, taking intoΒ consideration ageΒrelated changes, the presence of concomitant pathology and an increased risk of complications in patients of this age group. Β ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π² Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»Π΅Π½ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊ ΠΈΡ
Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ°Π· Π²ΡΡΠ΅, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ»Π°Π΄ΡΠ΅ 65 Π»Π΅Ρ. ΠΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ
ΠΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Geriatric Index of Comorbidity Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ. Π Π΅ΡΡΠΎΒΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
Background Nowadays, since the older people are keeping and increasing their professional and social activity, the risk of injury in these patients is escalating. However, the results of polytrauma treatment among patients over 60 years old are worse than in the group of younger patients. This may be associated with the presence of concomitant somatic pathology, which worsens the prognosis of for survival among elderly and senile patients. In the modern literature, there is no description of effective tools for assessing the comorbid status in elderly and senile patients with polytrauma. Nevertheless, there are scales and indices of comorbidity developed for non-surgical patients. To increase the effectiveness of treatment of patients over 60 years of age with polytrauma and a several concomitant diseases, it is necessary to develop new or adapt one of the already created tools for assessing comorbid status.Purpose of the study To assess the dependence of the mortality rate in a group of patients with polytrauma over 60 years of age on the presence of concomitant somatic pathology and its severity, calculated by the geriatric index of comorbidity.Materia l and methods During the period from 2005 to 2020, 116 patients with polytrauma and chronic somatic pathology were treated at the Sklifosovsky Institute. The inclusion criteria for the study were the following: patients aged over 60 years old; ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ patientsβ age over 60 years old; the Injury Severity Score over 17, the presence of concomitant somatic pathology in patients. The exclusion criteria were the lack of complete necessary information in the medical history, patientsβ age being less than 60 years old. The Geriatric Index of Comorbidity was calculated for each patient. A retrospective analysis was conducted.Results A Geriatric Index of Comorbidity of 3 or more in the elderly patients with polytrauma was found prognostically unfavorable for survival (p=0.005). When implementing the Geriatric Index of Comorbidity rating system, the presence of concomitant somatic pathology was found to have the greatest impact on elderly and senile patients with polytrauma and Injury Severity Score 18β24 (p=0.001).Conclusion The system of calculating the Geriatric Index of Comorbidity is advisable to use for assessing the risk of mortality from concomitant somatic pathology and its severity in patients with polytrauma over 60 years of age.ΠΠΠ’Π£ΠΠΠ¬ΠΠΠ‘Π’Π¬ ΠΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ, ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌ Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π΅Π½ΡΠ° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠΆΠ΅, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΎ Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡ
ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°. Π ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Ρ. Π§ΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°.Π¦ΠΠΠ¬ ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ― ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ Π΅Π΅, ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Geriatric Index of Comorbidity (GIC).ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ« Π ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Ρ 2005 ΠΏΠΎ 2020 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ Π² ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π‘ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ 116 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅: Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ, Π±Π°Π»Π» Injury Severity Score (ISS) Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 17, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 60 Π»Π΅Ρ. Π£ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ GIC. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·.Π ΠΠΠ£ΠΠ¬Π’ΠΠ’Π« ΠΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ GIC 3 ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π΅Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ (p=0,005). ΠΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ GIC ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π±Π°Π»Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ISS 18β24 (p=0,001)
Features of antifungal therapy during long-lasting infectious process: a clinical case of fungal keratitis and profile of antifungal sensitivity based on assessing biofilm formation
Among infectious diseases, opportunistic mycoses hold a special place. There has been accumulating a lot of evidence regarding the clinical and epidemiological aspects of infection caused by Fusarium spp., which global incidence rate among microbial keratitis ranges from 2 to 40% depending on the geographical location of the country. Colonizing mucous membranes, fungi can exist not only in the form of plankton, but form biofilms after surface attachment, which leads to elevated resistance to multiple antifungal agents. Here we describe a clinical case of fungal keratitis due to Fusarium solani by determining profile of the antifungal sensitivity for isolated fungal strains, by taking into account their potential for biofilm formation. We used an F. solani culture isolated from the patient as well as F. solani test culture obtained from the Russian National Collection of Microorganisms. While determining the sensitivity of fungal planktonic cultures to antifungal agents from the azole group (fluconazole, voriconazole), amphotericin B and terbinafine, it was revealed that antimycotics amphotericin B and voriconazole exerted a marked antifungal activity against clinical isolate, whereas the plankton F. solani test culture was more sensitive to all groups of antifungal agents. Due to a long-lasting progressive course of the infectious process and the high biofilm-forming ability of the clinical strain F. solani, the activity of antifungal agents on biofilm cells was modeled and examined in vitro. It was shown that regarding to the fungal biofilms, value of the minimally inhibitory concentration exceeded those for planktonic cultures by 100-fold. The mechanisms of action for antifungal agents on vital parameters of fungal cell structures were analyzed by using confocal laser scanning microscopy after staining samples with propidium iodide and acridine orange for 15 min to detect changes between intact and damaged cell surface. It was found that within the biofilm fungal cells preserved viability even after exposure to high concentrations of antifungals. In addition, despite the fungicidal drug activity at substantial concentrations acting on the biofilm cell membrane, the cell nuclei remained viable. Owing to the presence ot the mechanism of resistance in mycelial fungi shown in the study, it is necessary to take into account and investigate characteristics of biofilms in terms of drug sensitivity that will allow to optimize a choice of antimicrobial therapy
Improved method for the obtaining DTTA-appended 2,2β-bipyridine ligands for lanthanide cations
The composition of the reaction mixture after DTTA tert-butyl ester alkylation with 6'-halomethyl-5-phenyl-2,2'-bipyridines was studied. In addition to the target product, DTTA-appended 2,2β-bipyridine, the corresponding 6'-hydroxymethyl-substituted 2,2β-bipyridine and (5'-phenyl-[2,2'-bipyridin]-6-yl)methyl formate were isolated as by-products in some cases. Finally, an improved procedure for the DTTA tert-butyl ester alkylation with 6'-halomethyl-5-phenyl-2,2'-bipyridines by using Finkelstein reaction was developed
Synthesis of New Phosphorylated 1,2,4-Triazole-3-thiones. N,S-Functionalization Methods
Β© 2018, Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. New phosphorylated 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones have been synthesized, and the possibility of their N,Sfunctionalization has been demonstrated. The direction of alkylation of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones with ethyl acrylate has been shown to depend on the substituent on the N4 atom
High Efficiency of Kanakinumabum for a Patient with a Late Diagnosed Chronic Infantile Neurological Cutaneous Articular Syndrome (CINCA)
The article presents the monitoring of a severe course of CINCA/NOMID syndrome diagnosed at late stages. The use of monoclonalΒ antibodies to IL 1 β kanakinumabum β in a patient with chronic neurological cutaneous and articular syndrome was successful:Β fever, cutaneous and pain syndromes were completely stopped, joint contractures decreased after one week of therapy. LaboratoryΒ parameters of the childβs disease activity (ESR and CRP) became normal after 8 weeks of treatment. Movements in the affected jointsΒ recovered completely after 24 weeks; the audiologist noted an improvement in hearing. The above clinical example demonstrates theΒ high efficiency of kanakinumabum for a patient with chronic neurological cutaneous and articular syndrome, and shows the perspectiveΒ of therapeutic application of IL 1 blocker for patients with CINCA syndrome including advanced stages of the disease. No adverseΒ effects were noted during kanakinumabum therapy
Experience of the successful treatment with canakinumab of a patient with NLPC4-associated autoinflammatory syndrome with enterocolitis
The article shows the observation of rare NLPC4-associated autoinflammatory syndrome with enterocolitis and familial cold urticaria.Β Diagnosis is confirmed molecularly-genetically: previously not described mutation c.928C>T in the heterozygous state in NLRC4 gene isΒ discovered by a method of the new generation sequencing. The use of a monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 1 canakinumabΒ provided complete relief of fever and skin and intestinal symptoms in just 1 week of treatment. Later the signs of inflammation haveΒ disappeared completely; the patientβs quality of life improved and life-threatening complications were prevented. The above exampleΒ demonstrates the high clinical efficacy of canakinumab in the patient with NLRC4-associated autoinflammatory syndrome and suggestsΒ promising therapeutic use of interleukin 1 blockers in such patients. There were no adverse events during canakinumab therapy
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π²Π·Π³Π»ΡΠ΄ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ
The treatment of traumatic soft tissue detachments is an urgent problem for a first-level trauma hospital. This paper provides an analysis of the literature sources of the PubMed database, which are devoted to the classification, diagnosis and treatment of traumatic skin detachments. It was revealed that most of the works are publications of 1β2 clinical cases, only a few works are retrospective studies of patient groups. Currently, there is no generally accepted classification of traumatic detachment of soft tissues, due to the complexity and mosaic nature of pathoanatomical signs. According to the tactics of treatment, there is a difference in approaches for low-energy trauma (sports injury) and high-energy impact (traffic accidents, falls from a height). In the first case, the treatment methods are compression therapy, physiotherapy, and in rare cases, puncture. In the second case, puncture and drainage are the main method of treatment, and in persistent recurrent cases, chemical ablation or open surgery to excise the capsule in combination with vacuum drainage are the methods of treatment. Methods of endoscopic treatment of the walls of the detachment, ligation of the lymphatic vessels around the detachment, and the use of blockable sutures for obliteration of the detachment cavity are currently new methods of treatment, which effectiveness requires further study.ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Β ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Β ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΒ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉΒ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΒ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉΒ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°Β ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉΒ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅Β ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡΒ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Β Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π±Π°Π·Ρ PubMed, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ β ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ 1β2Β ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ β ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΒ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π²Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Β ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡΠ° Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ (ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°) ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ (Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅Β ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΡΡ). Π ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°ΡΒ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, Π² ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
β ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ β ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° Π² ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π°Π±Π»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΡΡΠ»Ρ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΡΠΌΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΒ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ·ΠΊΠΈΒ Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³ ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Β Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Β ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅Β Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΒ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΌΠ°Π±Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ
This article describes a case of successfully used tocilizumab (interleukin 6 receptors monoclonal antibodies) in a two-year patient with severe systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis resistant to oral and parenteral glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and methotrexate. Just after the first injection of tocilizumab, fever and pain ceased, morning stiffness decreased significantly; laboratory disease activity indices normalized by the 4th week of drug use; by the 16th week inflammatory changes in the joints regressed completely, the disease entered its inactive phase. After using tocilizumab, remission duration was 20 months for articular syndrome and systemic manifestations. No adverse reactions have been registered.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π» ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈΠ½Π° 6 ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΌΠ°Π±Π° Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
Π»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ°, ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌ, Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π£ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ, Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΊ 4-ΠΉ Π½Π΅Π΄ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ, ΠΊ 16-ΠΉ Π½Π΅Π΄ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Ρ
, Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π° Π½Π΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ. ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 20 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ. ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ