Volatile compared with total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery: a randomized multicentre study

n/

Dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

Background: Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active drugs against breast cancer and the search after their optimal combination is under intensive investigation in both the advanced and early disease settings. A dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin (E) and docetaxel (D) was conducted in advanced breast cancer (ABC) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support and to characterise its toxicity and activity profile. Patients and methods: Forty-two patients who received neither palliative chemotherapy nor adjuvant anthracyclines (55% with dominant visceral disease and 66% with ≥2 sites involved) with measurable/evaluable lesions, were treated at four dose levels starting from E 75 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2 to E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2. A maximum of four cycles of the combination was given every three weeks and four additional cycles of single agent D were allowed in responding patients. Cardiac function was monitored at baseline and at every second course by echocardiography. Results: Febrile neutropenia (two patients) and prolonged, severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.1 times 109/l for more than three days; one patient) defined the MTD of the combination without G-CSF support at E 90 mg/m2and D 75 mg/m2. G-CSF was then routinely administered from the subsequent dose level of E 120 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2. The MTD with G-CSF support was established at E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2 (one patient with neutropenic fever together with failure of ANC recovery at day 21, three patients with ANC less than 0.1 × 109l for more than three days, one patient with both and one patient with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and toxic death from typhlitis while neutropenic). No severe neurotoxicity, mucositis, or fluid retention were observed and there were no clinical signs of cardiotox-icity. Antitumour activity was not a primary endpoint of the study: the overall response rate (ORR) in 40 evaluable patients was 60% (95% confidence interval: 43%-75%, 58% in liver disease, 84% in soft tissue) with no apparent dose-related effect. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range 2-30$), the overall time to progression (TTP) in nine patients without maintenance hormonal therapy was five months. Conclusions: The combination of E and D proved to be an effective and safe regimen in poor- prognosis patients with ABC. G-CSF support allowed higher doses to be delivered safely but dose escalation did not translate into improved response rates (RR). The MTD without growth factors support was used, in a phase II trial, which also included patients with previous anthracycline-containing adjuvant regimen

Epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: A multicentric phase I-II study

Background The combination of anthracyclines and taxanes is currently considered the first choice chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC) and considerable emphasis has been placed on programs exploring the safest and most efficient way to integrate these classes of drugs in both the metastatic and, more recently, the adjuvant setting. We report here the overall results of the combination of epidoxorubicin (E) 90 mg/m2 and docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m2 as first-line chemotherapy in ABC. Patients and methods A total of 70 patients were entered in the initial dose-finding study (20 patients) and in the subsequent extended phase II trial (50 patients). Overall 54% of patients had dominant visceral disease and 57% had at least two metastatic sites. Adjuvant anthracyclines were allowed in the phase II part of the study based on the lack of cardiac toxicity observed in the phase I study at a median cumulative E dose of 480 mg/m2 A maximum of eight cycles of the combination was allowed, and cardiac function was monitored at baseline and after every second course by echocardiography. Results Overall, the median number of cycles administered with the combination was 4 (range 3-8). Neutropenia was confirmed to be the main haematological toxicity, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support required in 44% of the cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 12% of cycles of the combination but 52% of the episodes could be managed on an outpatient basis with oral antibiotics. Overall, the median cumulative dose of E, including prior adjuvant anthracyclines, was 495 mg/m2 (range 270-1020 mg/m2. One patient who received adjuvant E together with radiotherapy to the left chest wall developed fully reversible clinical signs of cardiotoxicity and a significant decrease of LVEF to 35% after a cumulative E dose of 870 mg/m2, with four additional patients (6%) developing asymptomatic and transient decline of resting LVEF. The overall response rate (ORR) in 68 evaluable patients was 66% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 54%-73%). A comparable antitumour activity of 71% was reported in the group of patients with a prior adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines. After an overall median follow-up time of 22 months (range 4−39+), the median time to progression (TTP) was 4.5 months and the median duration of response was 8 months (range 3-16). No pharmacokinetic (Pk) interaction could be demonstrated between E and D when given simultaneously and sequentially with a one-hour interval. Conclusions The combination of E and D in a multi-institutional setting is an active and safe regimen in poor-prognosis patients with ABC. New combinations and schedules are worth considering in an attempt to further improve disease response and long-term control of the diseas

High incidence of central nervous system involvement in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer treated with epirubicin and docetaxel

Summary Background: Clinically overt central nervous system (CNS) involvement occurs in 10%-15% of patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted a dose-finding phase I trial of epirubicin (E) and docetaxel (D) as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer patients. The study was expanded into a phase II at the recommended doses of E 90 mg/m2and D 75 mg/m2every three weeks. From July 1996 to May 1998, a total of 92 patients (median age 50 years) entered the two studies. Results: Twenty-eight out of ninety-two patients treated with the combination of E and D (30%) developed CNS metastases (95% confidence limits, 26%-35%), which were cerebral in twenty-five patients, leptomeningeal in two, and both in one. Of these 28 patients, 19 (68%) had an objective response. Median time for the development of CNS metastases from the start of chemotherapy was 15 months (range 5-42), if excluding the 6 patients presenting CNS progression within 3 months from start of treatment. It is notable that 11 patients (39%) had progression in the CNS only. Median survival from appearance of brain metastases in the whole group was only three months (range 1-22). C-erbB-2 overexpression was found in 14 out of 16 patients (87%) in whom the assay was performed (3+ in 10, 2+ in 1 and 1+ in 3 cases). Conclusions: As anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens are increasingly used both in the metastatic and in the adjuvant setting, a careful monitoring of any neurological symptom is advisable. Our preliminary observation on the possible increase of incidence of CNS involvement in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving this effective drug combination requires further evaluatio

Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: Long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive lymph node-negative breast cancer is being reassessed. Patients and methods: After stratification by ER status, 1669 postmenopausal patients with operable lymph node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to three 28-day courses of ‘classical' CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen for 57 months (CMF→tamoxifen) or to tamoxifen alone for 5 years. Results: ERs were positive in 81% of tumors. At a median follow-up of 13.1 years, patients with ER-positive breast cancers did not benefit from CMF [13-year disease-free survival (DFS) 64% CMF→tamoxifen, 66% tamoxifen; P = 0.99], whereas CMF substantially improved the prognosis of patients with ER-negative breast cancer (13-year DFS 73% versus 57%, P = 0.001). Similarly, breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was identical in the ER-positive cohort but significantly improved by chemotherapy in the ER-negative cohort (13-year BCFI 80% versus 63%, P = 0.001). CMF had no influence on second nonbreast malignancies or deaths from other causes. Conclusion: CMF is not beneficial in postmenopausal patients with node-negative ER-positive breast cancer but is highly effective within the ER-negative cohort. In the future, other markers of chemotherapy response may define a subset of patients with ER-positive tumors who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherap

Extracapsular tumor spread and the risk of local, axillary and supraclavicular recurrence in node-positive, premenopausal patients with breast cancer

Background: Extracapsular tumor spread (ECS) has been identified as a possible risk factor for breast cancer recurrence, but controversy exists regarding its role in decision making for regional radiotherapy. This study evaluates ECS as a predictor of local, axillary, and supraclavicular recurrence. Patients and methods: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI accrued 1475 eligible pre- and perimenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who were randomly assigned to receive three to nine courses of classical combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. ECS status was determined retrospectively in 933 patients based on review of pathology reports. Cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using methods for competing risks analysis. Adjustment factors included treatment group and baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The median follow-up was 14 years. Results: In univariable analysis, ECS was significantly associated with supraclavicular recurrence (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval 1.23-3.13; P = 0.005). HRs for local and axillary recurrence were 1.38 (P = 0.06) and 1.81 (P = 0.11), respectively. Following adjustment for number of lymph node metastases and other baseline prognostic factors, ECS was not significantly associated with any of the three recurrence types studied. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the decision for additional regional radiotherapy should not be based solely on the presence of EC

Patterns and risk factors for locoregional failures after mastectomy for breast cancer: an International Breast Cancer Study Group report

Background Rates and risk factors of local, axillary and supraclavicular recurrences can guide patient selection and target for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Patients and methods Local, axillary and supraclavicular recurrences were evaluated in 8106 patients enrolled in 13 randomized trials. Patients received chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy and mastectomy without radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 15.2 years. Results Ten-year cumulative incidence for chest wall recurrence of >15% was seen in patients aged 10%: ≥4 positive nodes (10.2%); for axillary failures of >5%: aged 15% were age <40, peritumoral vessel invasion or 0-7 uninvolved nodes. Age, number of positive nodes and number of uninvolved nodes were significant parameters for each locoregional relapse site. Conclusion PMRT to the chest wall and supraclavicular fossa is supported in patients with ≥4 positive nodes. With 1-3 positive nodes, chest wall PMRT may be considered in patients aged <40 years, with 0-7 uninvolved nodes or with vascular invasion. The findings do not support PMRT to the dissected axill

Adverse prognostic value of peritumoral vascular invasion: is it abrogated by adequate endocrine adjuvant therapy? Results from two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials of chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Background: Peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI) may assist in assigning optimal adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early breast cancer. Patients and methods: Patients participated in two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials testing chemoendocrine adjuvant therapies in premenopausal (trial VIII) or postmenopausal (trial IX) node-negative breast cancer. PVI was assessed by institutional pathologists and/or central review on hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides in 99% of patients (analysis cohort 2754 patients, median follow-up >9 years). Results: PVI, present in 23% of the tumors, was associated with higher grade tumors and larger tumor size (trial IX only). Presence of PVI increased locoregional and distant recurrence and was significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival. The adverse prognostic impact of PVI in trial VIII was limited to premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive tumors randomized to therapies not containing goserelin, and conversely the beneficial effect of goserelin was limited to patients whose tumors showed PVI. In trial IX, all patients received tamoxifen: the adverse prognostic impact of PVI was limited to patients with receptor-negative tumors regardless of chemotherapy. Conclusion: Adequate endocrine adjuvant therapy appears to abrogate the adverse impact of PVI in node-negative disease, while PVI may identify patients who will benefit particularly from adjuvant therap

Adverse prognostic value of peritumoral vascular invasion: is it abrogated by adequate endocrine adjuvant therapy? Results from two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials of chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Background: Peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI) may assist in assigning optimal adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early breast cancer. Patients and methods: Patients participated in two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials testing chemoendocrine adjuvant therapies in premenopausal (trial VIII) or postmenopausal (trial IX) node-negative breast cancer. PVI was assessed by institutional pathologists and/or central review on hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides in 99% of patients (analysis cohort 2754 patients, median follow-up >9 years). Results: PVI, present in 23% of the tumors, was associated with higher grade tumors and larger tumor size (trial IX only). Presence of PVI increased locoregional and distant recurrence and was significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival. The adverse prognostic impact of PVI in trial VIII was limited to premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive tumors randomized to therapies not containing goserelin, and conversely the beneficial effect of goserelin was limited to patients whose tumors showed PVI. In trial IX, all patients received tamoxifen: the adverse prognostic impact of PVI was limited to patients with receptor-negative tumors regardless of chemotherapy. Conclusion: Adequate endocrine adjuvant therapy appears to abrogate the adverse impact of PVI in node-negative disease, while PVI may identify patients who will benefit particularly from adjuvant therap