16 research outputs found

    Inter-individual responses to experimental muscle pain: Baseline physiological parameters do not determine whether muscle sympathetic nerve activity increases or decreases during pain

    No full text
    We have previously reported that there are inter-individual differences in the cardiovascular responses to experimental muscle pain, which are consistent over time: intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline, causing pain lasting ~60 min, increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA)-as well as blood pressure and heart rate-in certain subjects, but decrease it in others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that baseline physiological parameters (resting MSNA, heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability) determine the cardiovascular responses to long-lasting muscle pain. MSNA was recorded from the common peroneal nerve, together with heart rate and blood pressure, during a 45-min intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline solution into the tibialis anterior of 50 awake human subjects (25 females and 25 males). Twenty-four subjects showed a sustained increase in mean amplitude of MSNA (160.9 ± 7.3%), while 26 showed a sustained decrease (55.1 ± 3.5%). Between the increasing and decreasing groups there were no differences in baseline MSNA (19.0 ± 1.5 vs. 18.9 ± 1.2 bursts/min), mean BP (88.1 ± 5.2 vs. 88.0 ± 3.8 mmHg), HR (74.7 ± 2.0 vs. 72.8 ± 1.8 beats/min) or heart rate variability (LF/HF 1.8 ± 0.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3). Furthermore, neither sex nor body mass index had any effect on whether MSNA increased or decreased during tonic muscle pain. We conclude that the measured baseline physiological parameters cannot account for the divergent sympathetic responses during tonic muscle pain

    Central circuitry responsible for the divergent sympathetic responses to tonic muscle pain in humans

    No full text
    © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Experimentally induced tonic muscle pain evokes divergent muscle vasoconstrictor responses, with some individuals exhibiting a sustained increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), and others a sustained decrease. These patterns cannot be predicted from an individual's baseline physiological or psychological measures. The aim of this study was to inve stigate whether the different muscle sympathetic responses to tonic muscle pain were associated with differential changes in regional brain activity. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain was performed concurrently with microelectrode recording of MSNA from the peroneal nerve during a 40-min infusion of hypertonic saline into the ipsilateral tibialis anterior muscle. MSNA increased in 26 and decreased in 11 of 37 subjects during tonic muscle pain. Within the prefrontal and cingulate cortices, precuneus, nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus, and dorsomedial hypothalamus, blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal intensity increased in the increasing-MSNA group and remained at baseline or decreased in the decreasing-MSNA group. Similar responses occurred in the dorsolateral pons and in the region of the rostral ventrolateral medulla. By contrast, within the region of the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (dlPAG) signal intensity initially increased in both groups but returned to baseline levels only in the increasing-MSNA group. These results suggest that the divergent sympathetic responses to muscle pain result from activation of a neural pathway that includes the dlPAG, an area thought to be responsible for the behavioral and cardiovascular responses to psychological rather than physical stressors. Hum Brain Mapp 38:869-881, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

    Multicenter Analysis of Endovascular Aortic Arch In Situ Stent-Graft Fenestrations for Aortic Arch Pathologies

    No full text
    Background: In situ fenestration of aortic stent grafts for treatment of aortic arch aneurysms is a new option for endovascular aortic arch repair. So far, only few reports have shown perioperative and short-term results of in situ fenestrations for aortic arch diseases. We present the multicenter experience with the aortic arch in situ fenestration technique documented in the AARCHIF registry for treatment of aortic arch aneurysms or localized type A aortic dissections and analyzed perioperative outcome and midterm follow-up. Methods: Patients with aortic arch pathologies treated by aortic arch in situ fenestration with proximal stent graft landing in aortic arch Ishimura zones 0 and 1 were included in the registry. Stent-graft in situ fenestrations were created using needles or radiofrequency or laser catheters and completed by implantation of covered connecting stent grafts. Single in situ fenestrations for the left subclavian artery (LSA) were excluded. Results: Between 06/2009 and 03/2017, twenty-five patients were treated by in situ stent-graft fenestrations for aortic arch pathologies at 9 institutions in 7 different countries, 3 of them as bailout procedures for stent-graft malplacement. In situ fenestrations were performed for the bra-chiocephalic trunk (n = 20), the left common carotid artery (n = 21) and the LSA (n = 9). Technical success for intended in situ fenestrations was 94.0% (47/50), with additional supraaortic bypass procedures performed in 14 patients. Perioperative mortality occurred in 1 (4.0%) patient, treated as a bailout procedure and 3 (12.0%) perioperative strokes were observed. One proximal aortic stent-graft nonalignment and 4 type III endoleaks, 2 early and 2 late, required reeintervention. During follow-up (1-118 months), the diameter of aortic arch aneurysms decreased from 61.5 +/- 4.1 mm to 48.4 +/- 3.2 mm (P = 0.02) and, so far, 6 patients died from diseases unrelated to their aortic arch pathologies with a mean survival time of 79.5 months and 3 endovascular reinterventions for distal aortic expansion were performed. Cerebrovascular event (n = 4) was the most relevant prognostic factor for mortality during midterm follow-up (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The aortic arch in situ fenestration technique for endovascular aortic arch repair seems to be valuable treatment option for selected patients, although initial consideration of other treatment options is mandatory. Data about long-term durability are required
    corecore