Multiplex immunohistochemistry elucidates increased distance between cytotoxic T cells and plasma cells in relapsed myeloma, and identifies Lag-3 as the most common checkpoint receptor on cytotoxic T cells of myeloma patients

A dysfunctional immune tumor microenvironment facilitates disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM). Using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), we describe the quantitative and qualitative changes in CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and assess their proximity to malignant plasma cells (PC) in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded trephine sections from patients with MGUS (N=32), NDMM (N=65), and RRMM (N=59) were sequentially stained for CD138, CD3, CD8, and checkpoint receptors (CPR) Tim-3, Lag-3, and PD-1. The Halo® image analysis platform was used for cell segmentation and phenotyping, facilitating enumeration of cytotoxic T cells and analysis of proximity to PC. The percentage of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in proximity to PC is greater in patients with NDMM than patients with RRMM (at 50 μm distance, 90.8% vs. 81.5%; P=0.038). There is a trend for more CD3+ T cells in MGUS (P=0.08) but no difference was observed in the prevalence of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (P=0.48). Lag-3 is the most common CPR expressed on cytotoxic T cells in myeloma (P<0.0001), while PD-1 is the most common CPR on CD8- T cells of patients with MGUS and RRMM. Our study is the first to report on the spatial relationship between T cells and PC using mIHC on FFPE bone marrow trephine sections from patients with PC dyscrasia. The proximity of T cells to PC during early stages of MM, and overexpression of Lag-3, validate the move of immune therapeutic strategies, including T-cell engagers and checkpoint inhibitors, to upfront treatment or in early-line treatment of MM

Renal impairment at diagnosis in myeloma: Patient characteristics, treatment, and impact on outcomes. Results trom the Australia and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry

Background: Renal impairment (RI) is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and remains a poor prognostic factor despite improved survival with newer therapies. Patients and Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of newly diagnosed MM patients with RI at diagnosis in the Australia and New Zealand Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry over 5 years to April 2018; we compared patients with RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR

Isatuximab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: Updated safety run-in results from the randomized phase 3 ithaca study

Background: Results from a randomized, Phase 3 study by the Spanish Myeloma Group (PETHEMA/GEM) previously showed that treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) may delay progression to active disease in patients (pts) with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), compared with observation. To further improve outcomes, addition of the anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab (Isa) to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Rd) for the treatment of pts with high-risk SMM is being evaluated in the ongoing, randomized, multi-center, Phase 3 ITHACA study (NCT04270409). Initial findings from the safety run-in analysis of this trial have shown a manageable safety profile and encouraging, preliminary anti-myeloma activity. We now report updated safety and efficacy results from the safety run-in part of ITHACA at a median follow-up of 19.4 months. Methods: Pts were included in the study if they had been diagnosed within 5 years with SMM (per the International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria) and had high-risk SMM according to the Mayo '20-2-20' and/or updated PETHEMA model criteria. Pts who had received prior anti-myeloma treatment were not eligible. Enrolled pts received Isa 10 mg/kg IV on day (D) 1, 8, 15, and 22 in cycle (C) 1, D1 and D15 C2-12, D1 C13-36; plus R D1-21 (25 mg C1-9; 10 mg C10-24) and d weekly (40 mg, 20 mg for ≥75 yr-old pts C1-9; 20 mg C10-24). Cycle duration was 28 days. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs)/serious AEs and laboratory parameters, graded by NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Response was determined by IMWG criteria (2016). Mandatory imaging by MRI and/or low-dose whole-body CT/PET-CT, and assessments of minimal residual disease (MRD, by next-generation sequencing in pts with very good partial response [VGPR] or better), were performed at protocol-defined time points. The primary study objective for the safety run-in was to confirm the recommended dose of Isa in combination with Rd. Overall response rate (ORR) and MRD negativity rate at 10-5 sensitivity were included as secondary endpoints.Sanof

The efficacy of combination treatment with elotuzumab and lenalidomide is dependent on crosstalk between natural killer cells, monocytes and myeloma cells

Patients with refractory relapsed multiple myeloma respond to combination treatment with elotuzumab and lenalidomide. The mechanisms underlying this observation are not fully understood. Furthermore, biomarkers predictive of response have not been identified to date. To address these issues, we used a humanized myeloma mouse model and adoptive transfer of human natural killer (NK) cells to show that elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment controlled myeloma growth, and this was mediated through CD16 on NK cells. In co-culture studies, we showed that peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a subset of patients with refractory relapsed multiple myeloma were effective killers of OPM2 myeloma cells when treated with elotuzumab and lenalidomide, and this was associated with significantly increased expression of CD54 on OPM2 cells. Furthermore, elotuzumab- and lenalidomide-induced OPM2 cell killing and increased OPM2 CD54 expression were dependent on both monocytes and NK cells, and these effects were not mediated by soluble factors alone. At the transcript level, elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment significantly increased OPM2 myeloma cell expression of genes for trafficking and adhesion molecules, NK cell activation ligands and antigen presentation molecules. In conclusion, our findings suggest that multiple myeloma patients require elotuzumab- and lenalidomide-mediated upregulation of CD54 on autologous myeloma cells, in combination with NK cells and monocytes to mediate an effective anti-tumor response. Furthermore, our data suggest that increased myeloma cell CD54 expression levels could be a powerful predictive biomarker for response to elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment

Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is safe and effective in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: final report of the single arm, multicenter phase II ALLG MM018/AMN002 study.

This multicentre, phase II study of the Australian Lymphoma and Leukaemia Group (ALLG) and the Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) investigated fixed-duration (18-month) treatment with carfilzomib (K), thalidomide (T), and dexamethasone (d; KTd) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma and 1-3 prior lines of therapy. Patients received induction with up to twelve 28-day cycles of K [20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 day 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients ≥75 years) from day 8 onwards), T 100mg PO nocte and weekly dexamethasone 40mg (20mg for patients ≥75 years). During maintenance T was omitted, while K continued on days 1,2,15,16 with fortnightly dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, overall survival (OS), duration of response, safety, and tolerability. Ninety-three patients (median age 66.3 years (41.9 – 84.5)) were enrolled with a median follow-up of 26.4 (1.6 – 54.6) months. The median PFS was 22.3 months (95% CI 15.7 – 25.6) with a 46.3% (95% CI 35.1 – 52.8) 2-year PFS. Median OS was not reached and was 73.8% (95% CI 62.9 – 81.9) at 2 years. The overall response rate was 88% (≥ VGPR 73%). There was no difference in the depth of response, PFS or OS comparing Asian and Non-Asian cohorts (p=0.61). The safety profile for KTd was consistent with each individual drug. KTd is well tolerated and effective in patients with RRMM irrespective of Asian or non-Asian ethnicity and provides an alternative option particularly where use of KRd is limited by access, cost, or renal impairment

Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine on 30/05/2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1817249 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is a standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. We sought to determine whether the addition of daratumumab would significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in this population. METHODS We randomly assigned 737 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation to receive daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (daratumumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Treatment was to continue until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 28.0 months, disease progression or death had occurred in 240 patients (97 of 368 patients [26.4%] in the daratumumab group and 143 of 369 patients [38.8%] in the control group). The estimated percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 30 months was 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0 to 75.4) in the daratumumab group and 55.6% (95% CI, 49.5 to 61.3) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was 47.6% in the daratumumab group and 24.9% in the control group (P<0.001). A total of 24.2% of the patients in the daratumumab group, as compared with 7.3% of the patients in the control group, had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease (1 tumor cell per 105 white cells) (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (50.0% in the daratumumab group vs. 35.3% in the control group), anemia (11.8% vs. 19.7%), lymphopenia (15.1% vs. 10.7%), and pneumonia (13.7% vs. 7.9%).Published versio

The clinical role of novel biological agents and the in vivo immunological effects of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in the management of multiple myeloma

© 2010 Dr. Hang Ai QuachOver the last decade, the introduction of novel therapeutic agents including thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib has revolutionised the treatment and outlook of multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable plasma cell malignancy with significant morbidity. Our experience with these novel agents has yet to improve however, with regards to the optimal scheduling and combination therapy that would maximise response duration and survival. Furthermore, the exact anti-myeloma mechanisms of these agents are poorly understood, and many of the proposed mechanisms in vitro have yet to be corroborated in vivo. The work presented in this thesis aims to improve our current understanding of the in vivo immune modulation by lenalidomide in patients with MM, and to fine tune current treatment regimens based on our matured experience with these novel therapeutic agents, so as to minimise toxicity and maximise response and survival outcome. The first chapter (1A) reviews the current treatment paradigm of MM, and the current accepted role of thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and histone-deacetylase inhibitors. The current understanding of MM pathophysiology and the mechanism of actions of novel agents is reviewed in chapter 1B, providing a background for the correlative immunological studies in chapter 3B. The work from chapters 1A and 1B have culminated in 2 published review manuscript in Drugs and Aging 2007 and Leukemia 2009, respectively (see preface). The second chapter explores the long-term outcome to thalidomide-based treatment to show that depth of response to thalidomide correlates to survival outcome. This chapter highlights the importance complete remissions in the quest for durable responses in the era of novel therapeutic agents. The work from this chapter has been published as a manuscript in Leukemia & Lymphoma 2009. The following chapters (3,5,6) are a series of investigator-driven phase II trials exploring optimal scheduling of lenalidomide or bortezomib with dexamethasone in the treatment of relapsed or refractory MM, as well as the safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel bortezomib-romidepsin combination therapy. To enable the ongoing optimisation of treatment schedules or combinations of novel-agent, an understanding of their individual in vivo effects is important. Correlative immunological studies were therefore performed, as outlined in chapter 3B, to investigate the in vivo immunological changes in patients treated with immunomodulators, and how immune stimulation can be optimised to further improve clinical outcome. Indeed it was found that the concurrent use of dexamethasone abrogates lenalidomide-induced NK cell stimulation, and may subvert the full immune stimulatory capacity of lenalidomide. These findings have been submitted as a manuscript to Blood at the time of this thesis submission, and have been presented at several international scientific meetings. The insight that was gained from this correlative immunological study also resulted in a review manuscript on drug-mediated and cellular immunotherapy in MM, was published in Immunotherapy 2010. Overall, the work from this thesis aims to contribute to the shaping of optimal treatment strategies for MM, as well as an improved understanding of the in vivo effects of lenalidomide. We remain in an era of exploration of the role of novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of MM, and how to best manipulate sequential or combination therapy with the ultimate aim of cure, if not durable disease control