Benefits and risks of antiretroviral therapy for perinatal HIV prevention.

CAPRISA, 2016.Abstract available in pdf

Randomized Controlled Trial of Feeding a Concentrated Formula to Infants Born to Women Infected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus

OBJECTIVE:We tested the hypothesis that concentrated formula (CF) begun within the first 2 weeks of life increases growth in infants born to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected mothers. MATERIALS AND METHODS:HIV-exposed infants from the United States, the Bahamas, and Brazil were randomized in a double-blind, controlled trial to receive either a CF (87 kcal/100 mL [26 kcal/oz]) or a standard formula (SF; 67 kcal/100 mL [20 kcal/oz]) for 8 weeks. This article presents results for infants who were not determined to be HIV infected based on testing at 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and growth in weight and length. RESULTS:Two thousand ninety-seven infants were enrolled, of whom 1998 were uninfected and had study formula dispensed. At weeks 4 and 8, uninfected infants receiving CF showed higher energy intake than those who were receiving SF (P < 0.001). By week 8, uninfected infants assigned to CF weighed more than infants receiving SF. There were no consistent differences in measures of tolerability, and rates of discontinuation or perceived formula intolerance were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS:A CF is well tolerated and results in increased weight gain compared with SF. Until the HIV status of an infant is reliably determined, early introduction of a CF in HIV-exposed children may have beneficial effects on growth. The role of early nutritional intervention remains to be determined for individuals living in countries with endemic malnutrition for whom formula feeding is a viable option

Early initiation of lopinavir/ritonavir in infants less than 6 weeks of age: pharmacokinetics and 24-week safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND: With increasing recognition of the benefits of early antiretroviral therapy initiation in perinatally HIV-infected infants, data are needed regarding the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of recommended first-line protease inhibitors such as lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). METHODS: A prospective, phase I/II, open-label, dose-finding trial evaluated LPV/r at a dose of 300/75 mg/m twice daily plus 2 nucleoside analogs in HIV-1-infected infants \u3e or =14 days to /r therapy, and doses were modified to maintain LPV predose concentrations \u3e1 microg/mL and area under the curve (AUC) /mL. RESULTS: Ten infants enrolled [median age 5.7 (range, 3.6-5.9) weeks] with median HIV-1 RNA of 6.0 (range, 4.7-7.2) log10 copies/mL; all completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Nine completed the intensive PK evaluation at a median LPV dose of 267 (range, 246-305) mg/m q12 hours; median measures were AUC = 36.6 (range, 27.9-62.6) microg hr/mL; predose concentration = 2.2 (range, 0.99-4.9) microg/mL; maximum concentration = 4.76 (range, 2.84-7.28) microg/mL and apparent clearance (L/h/m) = 6.75 (range, 2.79-12.83). Adverse events were limited to transient grade 3 neutropenia in 3 subjects. By week 24, 2 of 10 subjects had experienced a protocol-defined virologic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although the LPV AUC in this population was significantly lower than that observed in infants ages 6 weeks to 6 months, LPV/r-based antiretroviral therapy in doses of 300/75 mg/m BID was well tolerated and resulted in virologic control in 8 of 10 infants by 24 weeks. Additional investigation is needed to understand the long-term implications of the lower LPV exposure in this age group

Establishing Dosing Recommendations for Efavirenz in HIV/TB-Coinfected Children Younger Than 3 Years.

BackgroundCYP2B6 516 genotype-directed dosing improves efavirenz (EFV) exposures in HIV-infected children younger than 36 months, but such data are lacking in those with tuberculosis (TB) coinfection.MethodsPhase I, 24-week safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of EFV in HIV-infected children aged 3 to &lt;36 months, with or without TB. CYP2B6 516 genotype classified children into extensive metabolizers (516 TT/GT) and poor metabolizers [(PMs), 516 TT]. EFV doses were 25%-33% higher in children with HIV/TB coinfection targeting EFV area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 μg × h/mL, with individual dose adjustment as necessary. Safety and virologic evaluations were performed every 4-8 weeks.ResultsFourteen children from 2 African countries and India with HIV/TB enrolled, with 11 aged 3 to &lt;24 months and 3 aged 24-36 months, 12 extensive metabolizers and 2 PMs. Median (Q1, Q3) EFV AUC was 92.87 (40.95, 160.81) μg × h/mL in 8/9 evaluable children aged 3 to &lt;24 months and 319.05 (172.56, 360.48) μg × h/mL in children aged 24-36 months. AUC targets were met in 6/8 and 2/5 of the younger and older age groups, respectively. EFV clearance was reduced in PM's and older children. Pharmacokinetic modeling predicted adequate EFV concentrations if children younger than 24 months received TB-uninfected dosing. All 9 completing 24 weeks achieved viral suppression. Five/14 discontinued treatment early: 1 neutropenia, 3 nonadherence, and 1 with excessive EFV AUC.ConclusionsGenotype-directed dosing safely achieved therapeutic EFV concentrations and virologic suppression in HIV/TB-coinfected children younger than 24 months, but further study is needed to confirm appropriate dosing in those aged 24-36 months. This approach is most important for young children and currently a critical unmet need in TB-endemic countries

Nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for HIV-infected children

CITATION: Violari, A. et al. 2012. Nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for HIV-infected children. New England Journal of Medicine, 366:2380-2389, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113249.The original publication is available at https://www.nejm.orgBACKGROUND: Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established. METHODS: In a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure to nevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. RESULTS: A total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log 10 copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P&lt;0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P = 0.04), as was the time to death (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.) Copyright © 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseaseshttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1113249Publisher's versio

Zidovudine, Didanosine, or Both as the Initial Treatment for Symptomatic HIV-Infected Children

Although treatment with zidovudine significantly reduces the likelihood of mother-to-infant transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 1 perinatally acquired infections still account for the majority of new cases of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in children. 2 , 3 Zidovudine has been the recommended treatment for these children, but controlled trials have not been conducted to compare it with other antiretroviral agents or combination therapies in children. Recent studies in adults suggest that combination antiretroviral regimens, particularly those including protease inhibitors, may prolong the period of HIV nonprogression, 4 but comparable studies have not been done in children. In this study, we compared . .