2 research outputs found

    A placebo-controlled randomised trial of budesonide for PBC following an insufficient response to UDCA

    Get PDF
    Background & Aims: In patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the efficacy of budesonide, a synthetic corticosteroid displaying high first-pass metabolism, is unresolved. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we evaluated the added-value of budesonide in those with PBC and ongoing risk of progressive disease despite ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. Methods: We evaluated 62 patients with PBC who had histologically confirmed hepatic inflammatory activity, according to the Ishak score, and an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN), after at least 6 months of UDCA therapy. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive budesonide (9 mg/day) or placebo once daily, for 36 months, with UDCA treatment (12-16 mg/kg body weight/day) maintained. Primary efficacy was defined as improvement of liver histology with respect to inflammation and no progression of fibrosis. Secondary outcomes included changes in biochemical markers of liver injury. Results: Recruitment challenges resulted in a study that was underpowered for the primary efficacy analysis. Comparing patients with paired biopsies only (n = 43), the primary histologic endpoint was not met (p>0.05). The proportion of patients with ALP = 15% decrease in ALP and normal bilirubin was higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group at 12, 24, and 36 months (p Conclusion: Budesonide add-on therapy was not associated with improved liver histology in patients with PBC and insufficient response to UDCA; however, improvements in biochemical markers of disease activity were demonstrated in secondary analyses. Lay summary: Around one-third of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) needs additional medical therapy alongside ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. In this clinical trial, the addition of the corticosteroid budesonide did not improve liver histology; there were however relevant improvements in liver blood tests. (C) 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.Peer reviewe

    Norursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 dose-finding trial

    No full text
    Background Norursodeoxycholic acid is an orally administered side chain-shortened homologue of ursodeoxycholic acid that undergoes hepatic enrichment with hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic activity. We assessed the efficacy of two doses of norursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Methods We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 dose-finding clinical trial in tertiary referral hospitals and medical centres in Austria (n=6) and Germany (n=23) for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with or without diabetes. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations of more than 0.8 times the upper limit of normal were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using a computer-generated central randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either norursodeoxycholic acid capsules at 500 mg per day or 1500 mg per day, or placebo, for 12 weeks with a subsequent 4-week follow-up period. All individuals involved in the trial were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean relative percentage change in ALT concentrations between baseline and end of treatment assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2013-004605-38. Findings Between March 30, 2015, and Sept 20, 2016, of 198 individuals included in the analysis, 67 patients were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg norursodeoxycholic acid, 67 to 1500 mg norursodeoxycholic acid, and 64 to placebo. A dose-dependent reduction in serum ALT between baseline and end of treatment was observed with norursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, with a significant effect in the 1500 ing group (mean change -27.8%, 95% repeated CI -34.7 to -14.4; p<0.0001). Serious adverse events (n=6) and treatment-emergent adverse events (n=314) were reported in a similar proportion of patients across groups. 112 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the 1500 mg group, 99 in the 500 mg group, and 103 in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse events were headache, gastrointestinal disorders, and infections (eg, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, or nasopharyngitis). Interpretation Norursodeoxycholic acid at 1500 mg resulted in a significant reduction of serum ALT within 12 weeks of treatment when compared with placebo. Norursodeoxycholic acid was safe and well tolerated encouraging further studies. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore