Process evaluation of a multicomponent dyadic intervention study with exercise and support for people with dementia and their family caregivers

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent dyadic intervention (a translated and adapted version of an intervention that has been shown to be effective for people with dementia in the USA) was performed. The exercise and support intervention was intended to reduce depressive symptoms of people with dementia and their caregivers. The purpose of this process evaluation is to create in-depth insight into the delivery of the intervention and the effect analysis, to prevent drawing inappropriate conclusions on the efficacy or effectiveness of the intervention, and to formulate recommendations for future studies on complex geriatric interventions. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. The process evaluation was performed according to the model presented by Reelick and colleagues, which encompasses the following three process components: (1) success rate of recruitment and quality of the study population; (2) the quality of execution of the complex intervention; and (3) the process of acquisition of the data. RESULTS: The study design met high research standards and the intervention was carefully delivered. Evaluation of the study population quality revealed a profound recruitment process resulting in a reasonable sample size. Attrition rate during follow-up was acceptable. With regard to the evaluation of the intervention quality, most interviewed participants experienced benefits of the intervention. Attendance at the home visits was high and attrition to homework was moderate. Evaluation of the data acquisition showed the positive value of the use of a mixed design; qualitative analysis of the intervention revealed outcomes not measured in the quantitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The process evaluation revealed a carefully and soundly performed study. The mixed design contributed to valuable insights. However, there were some restrictions worth considering. The intervention components may have a different feasibility by moderate attrition to homework and some negative experiences of participants, which may be an indication of too intensive an intervention for this frail population in this specific country. As a result, the results of the statistical effect analysis should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR1802, registration date 6 May 2009

Leesbaarheidsformules

Contains fulltext : 74596.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)9 p

The eye in metabolic diseases: clues to diagnosis

Ophthalmologic manifestations occur in various inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), including small molecule disorders and organelle disorders. In a minority of diseases the occurrence of eye abnormalities could be attributed to direct toxic mechanisms of abnormal metabolic products or accumulation of normal metabolites by errors of synthetic pathways or by deficient energy metabolism. The age of onset of ocular abnormalities in IEM is variable, but onset often begins from birth to childhood. The major IEM associated with eye abnormalities include errors of lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, protein metabolism, and metal metabolism. IEM disorders with ocular motor manifestations include lipid storage diseases, neurotransmitter disorders and respiratory chain disorders. The purpose of this article is to describe ocular phenotypes associated with IEM, focusing on those diseases in which the ocular involvement is seen relatively early in the course of the disease. As therapeutic approaches become available for certain groups of IEM, the need for early diagnosis is increasingly importan

Process evaluation of a multicomponent dyadic intervention study with exercise and support for people with dementia and their family caregivers

Background: A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent dyadic intervention (a translated and adapted version of an intervention that has been shown to be effective for people with dementia in the USA) was performed. The exercise and support intervention was intended to reduce depressive symptoms of people with dementia and their caregivers. The purpose of this process evaluation is to create in-depth insight into the delivery of the intervention and the effect analysis, to prevent drawing inappropriate conclusions on the efficacy or effectiveness of the intervention, and to formulate recommendations for future studies on complex geriatric interventions. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. The process evaluation was performed according to the model presented by Reelick and colleagues, which encompasses the following three process components: (1) success rate of recruitment and quality of the study population; (2) the quality of execution of the complex intervention; and (3) the process of acquisition of the data. Results: The study design met high research standards and the intervention was carefully delivered. Evaluation of the study population quality revealed a profound recruitment process resulting in a reasonable sample size. Attrition rate during follow-up was acceptable. With regard to the evaluation of the intervention quality, most interviewed participants experienced benefits of the intervention. Attendance at the home visits was high and attrition to homework was moderate. Evaluation of the data acquisition showed the positive value of the use of a mixed design; qualitative analysis of the intervention revealed outcomes not measured in the quantitative analysis. Conclusions: The process evaluation revealed a carefully and soundly performed study. The mixed design contributed to valuable insights. However, there were some restrictions worth considering. The intervention components may have a different feasibility by moderate attrition to homework and some negative experiences of participants, which may be an indication of too intensive an intervention for this frail population in this specific country. As a result, the results of the statistical effect analysis should be interpreted with caution. Trial registration: The study has been registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR1802, registration date 6 May 2009

The eye as a window to inborn errors of metabolism

Ocular manifestations in inborn errors of metabolism occur in many diseases and may be associated with any part of all eye components. In a minority of diseases it is possible to attribute the eye symptoms to a single hereditary pathogenetic mechanism. More often the aetiological relationship of the ocular defects to the metabolic disease is unknown. Diverse pathogenetic mechanisms may act via a common pathological pathway inducing ocular damage. The occurrence of eye abnormalities in metabolic disorders suggests that they are associated with direct toxic actions, errors of synthetic pathways or deficient energy metabolism. In this review, metabolic disorders with major abnormalities in the cornea, lens, retina and optic nerve are presented. In all cases, an appropriate combined approach by the ophthalmologist, paediatrician/neurologist, geneticist and clinical biochemist is the only way to diagnostic succes