Ethical dimensions of paediatric nursing: A rapid evidence assessment

© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. Background: Paediatric nurses often face complex situations requiring decisions that sometimes clash with their own values and beliefs, or with the needs of the children they care for and their families. Paediatric nurses often use new technology that changes the way they provide care, but also reduces their direct interaction with the child. This may generate ethical issues, which nurses should be able to address in the full respect of the child. Research question and objectives: The purpose of this review is to describe the main ethical dimensions of paediatric nursing. Our research question was, ‘What are the most common ethical dimensions and competences related to paediatric nursing?’ Research design: A rapid evidence assessment. Method: According to the principles of the rapid evidence assessment, we searched the PubMed, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases for papers published between January 2001 and March 2015. These papers were then independently read by two researchers and analysed according to the inclusion criteria. Ethical considerations: Since this was a rapid evidence assessment, no approval from the ethics committee was required. Findings: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Ethical issues in paediatric nursing were grouped into three areas: (a) ethical issues in paediatric care, (b) social responsibility and (c) decision-making process. Conclusion: Few studies investigate the ethical dimensions and aspects of paediatric nursing, and they are mainly qualitative studies conducted in critical care settings based on nurses’ perceptions and experiences. Paediatric nurses require specific educational interventions to help them resolve ethical issues, contribute to the decision-making process and fulfil their role as advocates of a vulnerable population (i.e. sick children and their families). Further research is needed to investigate how paediatric nurses can improve the involvement of children and their families in decision-making processes related to their care plan

La pratica infermieristica basata sui modelli teorici: uno studio qualitativo sulla percezione degli Infermieri

RIASSUNTO Molti studiosi sostengono che teoria e teorizzazione sono strettamente correlate alla pratica clinica e che il sapere disciplinare non procede solo dall'applicazione dei principi generali di grandi teorie ai casi particolari, ma si sviluppa, in maniera più pertinente, a partire dallo specifico contesto assistenziale nel quale si realizza. Ogni infermiere, infatti, possiede un modello mentale del quale può o meno essere consapevole, che motiva e sostanzia ogni azione e scelta professionale. Il presente studio descrive il modello teorico infermieristico che orienta l'agire professionale, il modello mentale e le conoscenze tacite ad esso sottese. Identifica nel modello teorico esplicito del gruppo professionale che gli infermieri partecipanti rappresentano, aspetti di continuití  con il modello teorico proposto da questo Corso di Laurea in Infermieristica, Sono stati realizzati 4 focus group ai quali hanno partecipato complessivamente 22 Infermieri, rappresentanti di quasi tutte le unití  operativa dell'Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia. E' possibile sostenere che il modello teorico infermieristico di ciascun gruppo professionale è il risultato di conoscenze tacite, che contribuiscono a definire il modello mentale di ciascun professionista e di un modello teorico esplicito cui sono sottesi contenuti teorici appresi applicati consapevolmente e riadattati alla/dalla pratica assistenziale. Ragionare sull'uso della teoria nella pratica ha permesso di dare visibilití  a un modello teorico esplicito autenticamente infermieristico orientato ai bisogni della persona, nella sua complessití  in specifici contesti.Parole chiave: modelli teorici dell'infermieristica, conoscenze tacite, sapere esplicito, pratica clinica, Focus Group. Nursing practice based on theoretical models: a qualitative study of nurses' perceptionABSTRACTMany faculty argue that theory and theorizing are closely related to the clinical practice, that the disciplinary knowledge grows, more relevantly, from the specific care context in which it takes place and, moreover, that knowledge does not proceed only by the application of general principles of the grand theories to specific cases. Every nurse, in fact, have a mental model, of what may or may not be aware, that motivate and substantiate every action and choice of career. The study describes what the nursing theoretical model is; the mental model and the tacit knowledge underlying it. It identifies the explicit theoretical model of the professional group that rapresents nursing partecipants, aspects of continuity with the theoretical model proposed by this degree course in Nursing.. Methods Four focus groups were made which were attended by a total of 22 nurses, rapresentatives of almost every Unit of Reggio Emilia Hospital's. We argue that the theoretical nursing model of each professional group is the result of tacit knowledge, which help to define the personal mental model, and the theoretical model, which explicitly underlying theoretical content learned applied consciously and reverted to / from nursing practice. Reasoning on the use of theory in practice has allowed us to give visibility to a theoretical model explicitly nursing authentically oriented to the needs of the person, in all its complexity in specific contexts.Key Words: nursing theories, tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge, clinical practice, focus group roups

Interobserver reproducibility of cytologic p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual immunostaining in human papillomavirus-positive women

BACKGROUND: The accumulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16(ink4a)) protein in a cell is associated with neoplastic progression in precancerous cervical lesions. Dual staining for p16(ink4a) and Ki-67 has been proposed as a triage test in cervical cancer screening for women who test positive for human papillomavirus DNA. In this study, interobserver reproducibility of the interpretation of this test was assessed. METHODS: Forty-two immunostained, liquid-based cytology slides were divided into 2 sets and were interpreted by 17 to 21 readers from 9 different laboratories, yielding a total of 816 reports. Immunostaining results were classified as positive, negative, inconclusive, or inadequate. After evaluation of the first set of slides and before circulation of the second set, the results were discussed in a plenary meeting. The 10 slides with the most discordant results were evaluated again by selected expert cytopathologists. RESULTS: The overall kappa value was 0.612 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.523-0.701), it was higher for the positive and negative categories (kappa=0.692 and kappa=0.641, respectively), and it was almost null for the inconclusive category (kappa=0.058). Considering only readers from laboratories with documented experience, the kappa value was higher (kappa=0.747; 95% CI, 0.643-0.839) compared with nonexperienced centers (kappa=0.498; 95% CI, 0.388-0.616). The results were similar in both sets of slides (kappa=0.505 [95% CI, 0.358-0.642] and kappa=0.521 [95% CI, 0.240-0.698] for the first and second sets, respectively). Reinterpretation of the slides with the most discordant results did not provide any improvement (first evaluation, kappa=0.616 [95% CI, 0.384-0.866]; second evaluation, kappa=0.403 [95% CI, 0.182-0.643]). CONCLUSIONS: Dual staining for p16(ink4a) and Ki-67 demonstrated good reproducibility, confirming its robustness, which is a necessary prerequisite for its adoption as a triage test in cervical cancer screening programs that use human papillomavirus DNA as a primary test. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125:212-20. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society

Recommendations for self-monitoring in pediatric diabetes: A consensus statement by the ISPED

none165noScaramuzza, Andrea; Cherubini, Valentino; Tumini, Stefano; Bonfanti, Riccardo; Buono, Pietro; Cardella, Francesca; D’Annunzio, Giuseppe; Frongia, Anna Paola; Lombardo, Fortunato; Monciotti, Anna Carla Maria; Rabbone, Ivana; Schiaffini, Riccardo; Toni, Sonia; Zucchini, Stefano; Frontino, Giulio; Iafusco, Dario; Arnaldi, Claudia; Banin, Patrizia; Barbetti, Fabrizio; Beccaria, Luciano; Benelli, Marzia; Berardi, Rosario; Biagioni, Martina; Bianchi, Giuliana; Bizzarri, Carla; Blasetti, Annalisa; Bobbio, Adriana; Boccato, Stefano; Bontempi, Franco; Bruzzese, Mariella; Cadario, Francesco; Calcaterra, Valeria; Cannatà, Alessandra; Cappa, Marco; Cardani, Roberta; Cardinale, Giuliana Marcella; Carloni, Ines; Castaldo, Vincenzo; Cauvin, Vittoria; Cerutti, Franco; Cester, Anna Maria; Chessa, Margherita; Chiarelli, Francesco; Chiari, Giovanni; Chiumello, Giuseppe; Cicchetti, Mario; Cirillo, Dante; Citriniti, Felice; Citro, Giuseppe; Coccioli, Maria Susanna; Cotellessa, Mario; Crinò, Antonino; De Berardinis, Fiorella; De Filippo, Gianpaolo; De Giorgi, Giovanni; De Luca, Filippo; De Marco, Rosaria; Delvecchio, Maurizio; Faleschini, Elena; Federico, Giovanni; Fifi, Anna Rita; Fontana, Franco; Franzese, Adriana; Frezza, Elda; Frongia, Annapaola; Gaiero, Alberto; Galderisi, Alfonso; Gallo, Francesco; Gargantini, Luigi; Ghione, Silvia; Giorgetti, Chiara; Gualtieri, Antonella; Guasti, Monica; Guerraggio, Lucia; Iannilli, Antonio; Ingletto, Dario; Iossa, Carmine; Iovene, Brunella; Iughetti, Lorenzo; Kaufmann, Peter; La Loggia, Alfonso; Lazzaro, Nicola; Lenzi, Lorenzo; Lera, Riccardo; Lia, Rosanna; Lo Presti, Donatella; Lorini, Renata; Lucchesi, Sonia; Luceri, Sergio; Madeo, Simona Filomena; Maffeis, Claudio; Mainetti, Benedetta; Mammi, Francesco; Manca Bitti, Maria Luisa; Marigliano, Marco; Marinari, Alessandra; Marinaro, Anna Maria; Meloni, Gianfranco; Marsciani, Alberto; Mastrangelo, Lisa; Mastrangelo, Costanzo; Meschi, Franco; Minasi, Domenico; Minenna, Adelaide; Minuto, Nicola; Monciotti, Carlamaria; Morganti, Gianfranco; Mozzillo, Enza; Nugnes, Rosa; Paradiso, Emanuela; Pardi, Daniela; Pasquino, Bruno; Patrizia Patera, Ippolita; Pennati, Cristina; Pepe, Rossella; Piccini, Barbara; Perrotta, Angelo; Piccinno, Elvira; Pinelli, Leonardo; Piredda, Gavina; Pocecco, Mauro; Ponzi, Giuseppe; Prandi, Elena; Predieri, Barbara; Prisco, Francesco; Quinci, Maria; Ricciardi, Maria Rossella; Rigamonti, Andrea; Ripoli, Carlo; Sabbion, Alberto; Salardi, Silvana; Salvatoni, Alessandro; Salvo, Caterina; Salzano, Giuseppina; Saporiti, Anna; Sardi, Rita; Schieven, Eleonardo; Scipione, Mirella; Soci, Cristina; Soro, Miriam; Spallino, Luisa; Stamati, Filomena; Suprani, Tosca; Savastio, Silvia; Taccardi, Rosa Anna; Tarchini, Luis; Tomaselli, Letizia; Tonini, Giorgio; Torelli, Cataldo; Tornese, Gianluca; Trada, Michela; Valerio, Giuliana; Vanelli, Maurizio; Vanini, Roberto; Vascotto, Marina; Vergerio, Amedeo; Viscardi, Matteo; Zaffani, Silvana; Zampolli, Maria; Zanatta, Manuela; Zanette, Giorgio; Zanfardino, Angela; Zecchino, Clara; Zedda, Maria Antonietta; Zuccotti, Gian VincenzoScaramuzza, Andrea; Cherubini, Valentino; Tumini, Stefano; Bonfanti, Riccardo; Buono, Pietro; Cardella, Francesca; D’Annunzio, Giuseppe; Frongia, Anna Paola; Lombardo, Fortunato; Monciotti, Anna Carla Maria; Rabbone, Ivana; Schiaffini, Riccardo; Toni, Sonia; Zucchini, Stefano; Frontino, Giulio; Iafusco, Dario; Arnaldi, Claudia; Banin, Patrizia; Barbetti, Fabrizio; Beccaria, Luciano; Benelli, Marzia; Berardi, Rossana; Biagioni, Martina; Bianchi, Giuliana; Bizzarri, Carla; Blasetti, Annalisa; Bobbio, Adriana; Boccato, Stefano; Bontempi, Franco; Bruzzese, Mariella; Cadario, Francesco; Calcaterra, Valeria; Cannatà, Alessandra; Cappa, Marco; Cardani, Roberta; Cardinale, Giuliana Marcella; Carloni, Ines; Castaldo, Vincenzo; Cauvin, Vittoria; Cerutti, Franco; Cester, Anna Maria; Chessa, Margherita; Chiarelli, Francesco; Chiari, Giovanni; Chiumello, Giuseppe; Cicchetti, Mario; Cirillo, Dante; Citriniti, Felice; Citro, Giuseppe; Coccioli, Maria Susanna; Cotellessa, Mario; Crinò, Antonino; De Berardinis, Fiorella; De Filippo, Gianpaolo; De Giorgi, Giovanni; De Luca, Filippo; De Marco, Rosaria; Delvecchio, Maurizio; Faleschini, Elena; Federico, Giovanni; Fifi, Anna Rita; Fontana, Franco; Franzese, Adriana; Frezza, Elda; Frongia, Annapaola; Gaiero, Alberto; Galderisi, Alfonso; Gallo, Francesco; Gargantini, Luigi; Ghione, Silvia; Giorgetti, Chiara; Gualtieri, Antonella; Guasti, Monica; Guerraggio, Lucia; Iannilli, Antonio; Ingletto, Dario; Iossa, Carmine; Iovene, Brunella; Iughetti, Lorenzo; Kaufmann, Peter; La Loggia, Alfonso; Lazzaro, Nicola; Lenzi, Lorenzo; Lera, Riccardo; Lia, Rosanna; Lo Presti, Donatella; Lorini, Renata; Lucchesi, Sonia; Luceri, Sergio; Madeo, Simona Filomena; Maffeis, Claudio; Mainetti, Benedetta; Mammi, Francesco; Manca Bitti, Maria Luisa; Marigliano, Marco; Marinari, Alessandra; Marinaro, Anna Maria; Meloni, Gianfranco; Marsciani, Alberto; Mastrangelo, Lisa; Mastrangelo, Costanzo; Meschi, Franco; Minasi, Domenico; Minenna, Adelaide; Minuto, Nicola; Monciotti, Carlamaria; Morganti, Gianfranco; Mozzillo, Enza; Nugnes, Rosa; Paradiso, Emanuela; Pardi, Daniela; Pasquino, Bruno; Patrizia Patera, Ippolita; Pennati, Cristina; Pepe, Rossella; Piccini, Barbara; Perrotta, Angelo; Piccinno, Elvira; Pinelli, Leonardo; Piredda, Gavina; Pocecco, Mauro; Ponzi, Giuseppe; Prandi, Elena; Predieri, Barbara; Prisco, Francesco; Quinci, Maria; Ricciardi, Maria Rossella; Rigamonti, Andrea; Ripoli, Carlo; Sabbion, Alberto; Salardi, Silvana; Salvatoni, Alessandro; Salvo, Caterina; Salzano, Giuseppina; Saporiti, Anna; Sardi, Rita; Schieven, Eleonardo; Scipione, Mirella; Soci, Cristina; Soro, Miriam; Spallino, Luisa; Stamati, Filomena; Suprani, Tosca; Savastio, Silvia; Taccardi, Rosa Anna; Tarchini, Luis; Tomaselli, Letizia; Tonini, Giorgio; Torelli, Cataldo; Tornese, Gianluca; Trada, Michela; Valerio, Giuliana; Vanelli, Maurizio; Vanini, Roberto; Vascotto, Marina; Vergerio, Amedeo; Viscardi, Matteo; Zaffani, Silvana; Zampolli, Maria; Zanatta, Manuela; Zanette, Giorgio; Zanfardino, Angela; Zecchino, Clara; Zedda, Maria Antonietta; Zuccotti, Gian Vincenz

Survey of neonatal respiratory care and surfactant administration in very preterm infants in the Italian neonatal network

Introduction: Variation of respiratory care is described between centers around the world.The Italian Neonatal Network (INN), as a national group of the Vermont-Oxford Network (VON) allows to perform a wide analysis of respiratory care in very low birth weight infants. Methods:We analyzed the dataset of infants enrolled in the INN in 2009 and 2010 and, for surfactant administration only, from 2006 to 2010 from 83 participating centers. All definitions are those of the (VON). A questionnaire analysis was also performed with a questionnaire on centers practices. Results: We report data for 8297 infants. Data on ventilator practices and outcomes are outlined. Variation for both practices and outcome is found. Trend in surfactant administration is also analyzed. Conclusions. The great variation across hospitals in all the surveyed techniques points to the possibility of implementing potentially better practices with the aim of reducing unwanted variation. These data also show the power of large neonatal networks in identifying areas for potential improvement. \ua9 Mattioli 1885

Survey of neonatal respiratory care and surfactant administration in very preterm infants in the Italian neonatal network

Introduction: Variation of respiratory care is described between centers around the world.The Italian Neonatal Network (INN), as a national group of the Vermont-Oxford Network (VON) allows to perform a wide analysis of respiratory care in very low birth weight infants. Methods:We analyzed the dataset of infants enrolled in the INN in 2009 and 2010 and, for surfactant administration only, from 2006 to 2010 from 83 participating centers. All definitions are those of the (VON). A questionnaire analysis was also performed with a questionnaire on centers practices. Results: We report data for 8297 infants. Data on ventilator practices and outcomes are outlined. Variation for both practices and outcome is found. Trend in surfactant administration is also analyzed. Conclusions. The great variation across hospitals in all the surveyed techniques points to the possibility of implementing potentially better practices with the aim of reducing unwanted variation. These data also show the power of large neonatal networks in identifying areas for potential improvement. © Mattioli 1885

Association of maternal hypertension and chorioamnionitis with preterm outcomes

OBJECTIVES: We compared the relative effect of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and chorioamnionitis on adverse neonatal outcomes in very preterm neonates, and studied whether gestational age (GA) modulates these effects. METHODS: A cohort of neonates 23 to 30 weeks' GA, born in 2008 to 2011 in 82 hospitals adhering to the Italian Neonatal Network, was analyzed. Infants born from mothers who had hypertensive disorders (N = 2096) were compared with those born after chorioamnionitis (N = 1510). Statistical analysis employed logistic models, adjusting for GA, hospital, and potential confounders. RESULTS: Overall mortality was higher after hypertension than after chorioamnionitis (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.80), but this relationship changed across GA weeks; the OR for hypertension was highest at low GA, whereas from 28 weeks' GA onward, mortality was higher for chorioamnionitis. For other outcomes, the relative risks were constant across GA; infants born after hypertension had an increased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.68-2.88) and severe retinopathy of prematurity (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.02-2.15), whereas there was a lower risk for early-onset sepsis (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.19-0.34), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88), periventricular leukomalacia (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48-1.01), and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis or gastrointestinal perforation (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and other adverse outcomes in very preterm infants depend on antecedents of preterm birth. Hypertension and chorioamnionitis are associated with different patterns of outcomes; for mortality, the effect changes across GA weeks. Copyright \uc2\ua9 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics