5 research outputs found

    Quality Improvement Project to Evaluate Discharge Prescriptions in Children With Cystic Fibrosis

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) requires multiple pharmaceutical treatments, elevating the risk of medication errors (ME), which may compromise patient safety. This study aimed to improve the quality of discharge prescriptions (DPs) using indicators following admissions for IV antibiotics in pediatric CF patients. Methods: This project involved a longitudinal observational retrospective descriptive study followed by a longitudinal quasi-experimental prospective phase between January 2013 and December 2016 in CF patients admitted to a London Children's Hospital. The CF pharmacist reviewed DPs. Six rights of medication administration were defined (6R): dose, drug, frequency, duration of treatment, pharmaceutical form, and route of administration. We classified ME according to 6R, including subtype of error: committed/omitted. We calculated quality indicators by dividing the number of each correct parameter defined by 6R by number of DPs. Retrospective results were used prospectively to describe and implement improvement strategies and safety actions. Results: The retrospective study phase included 42 CF children (100 hospital admissions and 1,343 drugs). The prospective phase included thirty-five children (55 admissions and 822 drugs). The total number of ME identified was 148 (78 committed; 70 omitted) in retrospective phase and 135 (19 committed; 116 omitted) in prospective phase. Quality indicators for drug and dose showed significant improvement after implementing safety strategies. The global quality indicator increased from 22% (retrospective) to 41.82% (prospective), but we did not achieve the previously defined quality standard value (50%). Conclusions: A retrospective review of DP by a CF Pharmacist identified failures in DP quality. Implementing improvement strategies improved prescribing. Integrating pharmacist within multidisciplinary team improves DP reducing errors

    A multi-site case study of community-clinical linkages for promoting HPV vaccination

    No full text
    Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in the U.S. are suboptimal, requiring innovative partnerships between community and clinical entities to remedy this issue. A rigorous evaluation of HPV-related community-clinical linkages (CCLs) was conducted to understand their components, processes, and outcomes to increase HPV vaccination. Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) investigators explored CCLs in their communities employing an iterative, case study approach. Information describing nine CCLs on HPV vaccination was collected from representatives from the community organization and clinical setting. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze and interpret data. Five CCLs included a federally qualified health center as the clinical partner, and five included a non-profit organization as the community partner. Five reflected clinically focused integration wherein engagement occurs in the community but vaccine delivery and follow-up occur in the clinical setting. The main impetus was the need to improve HPV vaccination and a community’s strong interest in preventing cancer. Noted critical components were a designated person to support the CCL and funding. Results will guide HPV vaccination promotion, education, and intervention efforts. CCLs provide an opportunity to study the adaption, integration, and enhancement of evidence-based approaches to increase HPV vaccination
    corecore