Clinical and biological effects of interleukin 12 in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Il-12 has a number of immunoregulatory properties indicating its therapeutic potential against cancer. The encouraging anti-tumor effects, observed in a variety of animal tumor models, have stimulated the development of Il-12 as a single agent for systemic cytokine therapy of cancer in humans. Metastatic renal cell cancer is one of the few human cancers that are more responsive to immunotherapy than to conventional cytotoxic therapies. Therefore, a phase I study of Il-12 was performed in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. The choice of schedule and route of administration were based on experiments in cynomolgus monkeys. Il-12 in s.c. doses of 0.1 to 1.0 Jlg /kg /day, three times a week, was shown to modulate immune activity without provoking substantial toxicity in these animals. The objective of the study described in chapter 2 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous IL-12 in humans and establish the pharmacokinetic profile. The observation of a non-linear relationship between dose and drug exposure in animal models formed the rationale to study the effects of a single and multiple doses of Il-12. In chapter 3 the immunomodulatory activities of IL-12 in humans are described in detail, with emphasis on the induction of secondary cytokines and the effects on circulating leucocyte subset counts. Based on the observation that side effects decreased upon repeated injections of IL-12, we specifically studied whether or not immunomodulatory effects were downregulated in the course of multiple IL-12 injections with special attention for the role of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. Chapter 4 describes a study of the effect of IL-12 on fibrinolysis and coagulation in humans. This study was performed because several bleeding episodes were reported in simultaneously performed clinical studies, whereas studies in mice and non-human primates had shown that IL-12 induced activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Il-12 is a strong pro-inflammatory cytokine. Studies in patients and experimental animals have demonstrated that endogenously produced IL-12 plays an important role in the toxic sequel of sepsis and endotoxemia. In these situations, excessive activation of various components of the inflammatory cascade contributes to the development of tissue injury and mortality. In chapter 5 we describe the in-vivo effects of different doses of subcutaneous Il-12 on components of the inflammatory cascade. We specifically addressed the degranulation of neutrophils and the formation of secretory phospholipase Az, a regulatory enzyme in the formation of eicosanoids. The study described in chapter 2 was one of four phase I studies, that were simultaneously performed in Europe and the US. Subsequent phase II studies in patients with advanced renal cell cancer and ovarian cancer demonstrated disappointing anti-tumor effects. The results described in chapter 3, together with other pharmacodynamic studies, indicate that the lack of efficacy was accompanied by, and probably related to, declining biological effects of IL-12 in the course of repeated administrations at doses approaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Nevertheless, IL-12 remains a promising immunotherapeutic agent because recent cancer vaccination studies in animal models and humans have demonstrated its powerful adjuvant properties. Chapter 6 reviews the adjuvant properties of IL-12 and delineates how the immuneregulatory properties of IL-12 described in the previous chapters may contribute to the adjuvant effects. In addition, it is discussed how the studies presented in this paper, together with other clinical studies of systemic IL-12, indicate that IL- 12 may exert optimal adjuvant effects only at low dose levels. Finally, the future perspectives of IL-12 in the treatment of cancer are addressed

Nationwide trends in chemotherapy use and survival of elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Despite an aging population and underrepresentation of elderly patients in clinical trials, studies on elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are scarce. This study investigated the use of chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. From the Netherlands Cancer Registry, all 9407 patients diagnosed with primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 2005–2013 were selected to investigate chemotherapy use and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Over time, chemotherapy use increased in all age groups (<70 years: from 26 to 43%, 70–74 years: 14 to 25%, 75–79 years: 5 to 13%, all P < 0.001, and ≥80 years: 2 to 3% P = 0.56). Median age of 2,180 patients who received chemotherapy was 63 years (range 21–86 years, 1.6% was ≥80 years). In chemotherapy-treated patients, with rising age (<70, 70–74, 75–79, ≥80 years), microscopic tumor verification occurred less frequently (91-88-87-77%, respectively, P = 0.009) and OS diminished (median 25-26-19-16 weeks, P = 0.003). After adjustment for confounding factors, worse survival of treated patients ≥75 years persisted. Despite limited chemotherapy use in elderly age, suggestive of strong selection, elderly patients (≥75 years) who received chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer exhibited a worse survival compared to younger patients receiving chemotherapy

Early stage breast cancer treatment and outcome of older patients treated in an oncogeriatric care and a standard care setting: an international comparison

Introduction: Since older patients with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, an oncogeriatric approach is advocated to guide treatment decisions. However, the effect on outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare treatments and outcomes between patients treated in an oncogeriatric and a standard care setting. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 70 years with early stage breast cancer were included. The oncogeriatric cohort comprised unselected patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, and the standard cohort patients from a Dutch population-based cohort. Cox models were used to characterize the influence of care setting on recurrence risk and overall mortality. Results: Overall, 268 patients were included in the oncogeriatric and 1932 patients in the standard cohort. Patients in the oncogeriatric cohort were slightly younger, had more comorbidity, and received more adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Oncogeriatric care was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, which remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.99]. Oncogeriatric care was also associated with a lower overall mortality, which also remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87). Conclusions: Patients treated in the oncogeriatric care setting had a lower risk of recurrence, which may be explained by more systemic treatment. Overall mortality was also lower, but other explanations besides care setting could not be ruled out as the cohorts had different patient profiles. Future studies need to clarify the impact of an oncogeriatric approach on outcomes

A randomized phase 2 study exploring the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: The HAT study (BOOG 2008-2003), a Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group trial

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach, the authors evaluated the combination of bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel (HAT) and the regimen of trastuzumab and bevacizumab (HA) with the addition of paclitaxel after progression (HA-HAT) as first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a noncomparative phase 2 trial, patients were randomized between HAT and HA-HAT. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 1 year (1-year PFR). In the HA-HAT group, progression-free survival (PFS) was separately established for HA (PFS1) and HAT (PFS2). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received HAT (n = 39) or HA-HAT (n = 45). The 1-year PFR was 74.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.8%-89.4%) and 62.2% (95% CI, 49.6%-89.4%) in the HAT and HA-HAT arms, respectively. The median PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 14.9-25.6 months) in the HAT arm and 19.6 months (95% CI, 12.0-32.0 months) in the HA-HAT arm. In the HA-HAT arm, the median PFS1 was 10.4 months (95% CI, 6.2-15.0 months), and the median PFS2 was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.6 months). The number and severity of adverse events were comparable between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Both HAT and HA-HAT have promising activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In particular, starting with only targeted agents and delaying chemotherapy is worth further exploration