21 research outputs found

    Ebola virus disease and critical illness

    Get PDF

    Tetanus in War Victims in Afghanistan

    No full text
    Tetanus represents a significant emergency in low-resource countries involved in crisis scenarios. The management of the disease requires strategies that take into account the lack of health facilities and the necessary tools. This field lesson taken from the experience of the NGO Emergency seeks to clarify the aspects connected with the management of tetanus cases in the setting of Afghanistan

    Civilian war victims in Afghanistan: five-year report from the Kabul EMERGENCY NGO hospital

    No full text
    Background Afghanistan has been plagued by war for more than 30 years, but little is known about the civilian cost of such a long-lasting conflict. In particular, the incidence of war injuries among civilians has largely been under-reported. EMERGENCY NGO's Surgical Centre for War Victims has been operating in Kabul since 2001, providing care free of charge to anyone injured in war. The primary aim of our study is to describe the population of patients admitted to our hospital in Kabul. Methods This is a 5-year retrospective analysis of all recorded hospital admissions at EMERGENCY NGO's hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan, from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Results During the study period, 16,053 patients were admitted. Of these, 85.7% were male and 17.5% were under 14 years old. The proportion of male patients increased progressively with the age ranges (from 63.4 to 89.0%). Bullet wounds were the most frequent kind of injury (55.6%), followed by shell, stab and mine wounds (32.2%, 8.3% and 3.9% respectively). Only 5.8% of patients arrived at our hospital within the "golden hour " following injury. No significant reduction in the hospitalization trend was observed over the study period. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.41%, which bore no correlation to the number of admissions. Conclusions This study provides for the first time epidemiology of war-related injuries in a hospital located in a place of long-standing conflict

    Kabul airport suicide bombing attack: Mass casualty management at the EMERGENCY NGO Hospital

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Terrorist attacks with large numbers of civilian victims are not uncommon in war-torn countries, and present a unique challenge for health care facilities with limited resources. However, these events are largely underreported and little is known about how the mass casualty events (MCEs) are handled outside of a military setting.METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of the MCE which ensued the Kabul Airport suicide attack (August 26, 2021) at the Kabul EMERGENCY NGO Hospital (Afghanistan).RESULTS: Within 6 hours, 93 causalities presented at our hospital. Of them, 36 severe injured were admitted. Mean age was 30.8 years (SD, 10.1 years). The most common injury mechanism was shell fragments. The most common injury site was head (63%; 23/36), followed by limbs (55.5%; 20/36) and thoracoabdominal region (30.5%; 11/36). Combined injuries occurred in 38.9% of cases. Patients receiving surgery presented more combined injuries in comparison with patients receiving only medical treatment (47.1% vs. 31.6%). Thoracoabdomen (25.0% vs. 15.4%) and/or extremity injury (42.9% vs. 28.6%) were more prevalent in the surgical group. Thirty major surgical procedures were carried out on 17 patients in the 9 hours following the first arrival. The rate of intensive care unit/high dependency unit admission was 36.1% and the 30-day in-hospital mortality was 16.6% (6/36). All deaths were recorded in the first 24 hours, and none of them received surgery.CONCLUSION: A large number of wounded patients must be anticipated after suicide bombing attacks. The authors report the challenges faced and key aspects of their management of MCEs. Copyright (C) 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

    Rates and Determinants of Hospital-Acquired Infection among ICU Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery in Developing Countries: Results from EMERGENCY’NGO’s Hospital in Sudan

    No full text
    Introduction. Knowledge of local and regional antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is crucial in clinical decision-making, especially with critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate and pattern of infections in valvular heart disease patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the Salam Centre for Cardiac Surgery in Khartoum, Sudan (run by EMERGENCY NGO). Methods. This is a retrospective, observational study from a single, large international referral centre (part of a Regional Programme), which enrolled patients admitted to the ICU between 1 January and 31 December 2019. Data collected for each patient included demographic data, operating theatre/ICU data and microbiological cultures. Results. Over the study period, 611 patients were enrolled (elective surgery n = 491, urgent surgery n = 34 and urgent medical care n = 86). The infection rate was 14.2% and turned out to be higher in medical than in surgical patients (25.6% vs. 12.4%; p = 0.002; OR = 2.43) and higher in those undergoing urgent surgery than those undergoing elective (29.4% vs. 11.2%; p = 0.004; OR = 3.3). Infection was related to (a) SOFA score (p < 0.001), (b) ICU length of stay (p < 0.001) and (c) days from ICU admission to OT (p = 0.003). A significant relationship between the type of admission (elective, urgent surgery or medical) and the presence of infections was found (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was higher among infected patients (infected vs. infection-free: 10.3% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001; OR = 5.38; 95% CI: 2.16–13.4; p < 0.001). Conclusions. Hospital-acquired infections remain a relevant preventable cause of mortality in our particular population

    Are adaptive randomised trials or non-randomised studies the best way to address the Ebola outbreak in west Africa?

    Full text link
    The Ebola outbreak that has devastated parts of west Africa represents an unprecedented challenge for research and ethics. Estimates from the past three decades emphasise that the present effort to contain the epidemic in the three most affected countries (Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone) has been insufficient, with more than 24 900 cases and about 10 300 deaths, as of March 25, 2015. Faced with such an exceptional event and the urgent response it demands, the use of randomised controlled trials (RCT) for Ebola-related research might be both unethical and infeasible and that potential interventions should be assessed in non-randomised studies on the basis of compassionate use. However, non-randomised studies might not yield valid conclusions, leading to large residual uncertainty about how to interpret the results, and can also waste scarce intervention-related resources, making them profoundly unethical. Scientifically sound and rigorous study designs, such as adaptive RCTs, could provide the best way to reduce the time needed to develop new interventions and to obtain valid results on their efficacy and safety while preserving the application of ethical precepts. We present an overview of clinical studies registered at present at the four main international trial registries and provide a simulation on how adaptive RCTs can behave in this context, when mortality varies simultaneously in either the control or the experimental group
    corecore