Reconstruction and dialogue in the recovery of the lost paradigm «human-nature»

In the context of the aggravation of global contradictions in the interaction of man and nature, environmental consciousness must respond quickly and adequately to the situation, outstrip threatening events and seek ways to overcome environmental disruptions and harmonize relations in the supersystem «nature». These challenges encourage the natural and human sciences to create for man a new knowledge, which would be based on the laws of human development, as part of nature, and the principles of value-semantic proportionality of human existence in nature. The complex of analytical, theoretical research methods and historical reconstruction provided an opportunity to substantiate the significance of the value-semantic relation of man to nature as the axiology of ethical correction of ways of interaction between man and nature. It is proved that the natural and humanitarian scientific systems should be based on the historical reflection of the evolution of nature and society and the analysis of the stages of the value relation of man to nature to form a new value position in relation to nature, based on the comprehension of the principle unity of society and nature, on the awareness of the laws of co-evolution, on recognition of the genetic priority of nature, ecological and moral imperative, taking into account ethnocultural factors of the formation of an ecophilic tradition. The rational-cognitive component of the content of education and culture should be accompanied by discursive ethics and the meanings of the «world of life», which cannot be realized without a human dialogue, which unfolds in various vital senses and appears directed to the proportionality of being of man with all living and nonliving world. The disclosure of the idea of co-evolution, the planetary, universal approach to the solution of terrestrial social and economic problems and problems caused by environmental laws, confirmed the need for historical reconstruction of not only the stages of interaction of components of the supersystem «Man-Nature», but also that without the theoretical reconstruction of the history of value relation of man to establish in nature in the minds of the ideas of universalism, the idea of the need for self-restraint, the experience of previous human development, the idea of optimal use Earth's resources, ideas preservation and enhancement of biodiversity, consolidation of mankind from tradition ekofilniy not possible. Reconstructed and reflexive world and domestic humanitarian heritage, modern discourse ethics of nature should become the object of informative-dialogic interaction of representatives of different cultural preferences. The dialogue as a construct of understanding and concordia will translate the genetic priority of nature, the ecological imperative, the ethics of responsibility and non-violence, invariance to the value

Reconstruction and dialogua in the recovery of the lost paradigm «human-nature»

In the context of the aggravation of global contradictions in the interaction of man and nature, environmental consciousness must respond quickly and adequately to the situation, outstrip threatening events and seek ways to overcome environmental disruptions and harmonize relations in the supersystem «nature». These challenges encourage the natural and human sciences to create for man a new knowledge, which would be based on the laws of human development, as part of nature, and the principles of value-semantic proportionality of human existence in nature. The complex of analytical, theoretical research methods and historical reconstruction provided an opportunity to substantiate the significance of the value-semantic relation of man to nature as the axiology of ethical correction of ways of interaction between man and nature. It is proved that the natural and humanitarian scientific systems should be based on the historical reflection of the evolution of nature and society and the analysis of the stages of the value relation of man to nature to form a new value position in relation to nature, based on the comprehension of the principle unity of society and nature, on the awareness of the laws of co-evolution, on recognition of the genetic priority of nature, ecological and moral imperative, taking into account ethnocultural factors of the formation of an ecophilic tradition. The rational-cognitive component of the content of education and culture should be accompanied by discursive ethics and the meanings of the «world of life», which cannot be realized without a human dialogue, which unfolds in various vital senses and appears directed to the proportionality of being of man with all living and nonliving world. The disclosure of the idea of co-evolution, the planetary, universal approach to the solution of terrestrial social and economic problems and problems caused by environmental laws, confirmed the need for historical reconstruction of not only the stages of interaction of components of the supersystem «Man-Nature», but also that without the theoretical reconstruction of the history of value relation of man to establish in nature in the minds of the ideas of universalism, the idea of the need for self-restraint, the experience of previous human development, the idea of optimal use Earth's resources, ideas preservation and enhancement of biodiversity, consolidation of mankind from tradition ekofilniy not possible. Reconstructed and reflexive world and domestic humanitarian heritage, modem discourse ethics of nature should become the object of informative-dialogic interaction of representatives of different cultural preferences. The dialogue as a construct of understanding and concordia will translate the genetic priority of nature, the ecological imperative, the ethics of responsibility and non-violence, invariance to the value

Historical reconstruction of the reproduction of axiology of nature in ukrainian philosophical tradition: methodological reference points

The research aim is to define and substantiate the methodological guidelines for the historical reconstruction of Ukrainian philosophical tradition of axiology of the nature. First of all, the research methodology as a synthesized self-reflection of historical humanities, in the search for new knowledge, should be based on human-centered approaches, principles and methods and it has to take into account evolutionary changes in the world society, the conceptual and historical-contextual influence on human consciousness. In the article on the basis of philosophical, general scientific and specific historical methodology, with the help of historical-genetic and historical-comparative methods, there have been explicated the new guidelines for the theoretical reconstruction of the eco-friendly tradition of the Ukrainian people, presented as the value-semantic concentrated form by the philosophical anthropological thought. The scientific novelty is that historical reconstruction at all levels of the methodology is presented as a construct of axiological reproduction of the cultural memory of the people, in particular its value-semantic relation to nature: analyzed analytical and phenomenological methods of studying the problem; Interpreted the value-semantic potential of the axiology of nature G. Skovoroda, M. Gogol, I. Franko, V. Vernadsky, who long before the "cataclysms" in the system "nature - society" formed the ideas of co-evolution, genetic priority, ecological imperative, ethics of responsibility. The study proves the need to rethink the value-normative method of understanding the value of nature, the transition to a cognitive-communicative method of acquiring new knowledge and a wide range of scientific procedures. In the article, the current requirements to historical humanities are defined as the orientation to postmetaphysical thinking, linguistic turn, the specification of the reason and rejection from the advantages of theory over practice. All of this enables the theoretical reconstruction of the domestic philosophical tradition and renews the cultural memory of the people, in particular, the value-semantic attitude of man to the nature. The analytical and phenomenological methods, taking into account the living world and ethno-cultural variability of the value-normative method, cognitive-communicative process of acquiring the new knowledge ensure the correction of value determinants for modern humans. The axiological positions of G. Skovoroda, I. Franko, V. Vernadsky in defining the ecological determinants of the development of the "Man-Nature" system must be recognized as a movement to advance