Akut travmada rutin laboratuvar testlerinin kullanımı: Geriye dönük bir analiz

BACKGROUND: In more than 60 countries worldwide, laboratory testing plays a challenging and expensive role in trauma resus-citation. In 1995, the literature already suggested that routine laboratory testing may not be useful for most trauma patients. Our study hypothesized that still the need for some laboratory tests perhaps should be reconsidered. Therefore, the aim of this study was to create more insight in the distribution between normal and abnormal parameters for routine laboratory testing in trauma patient management. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed at Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, an academic level 1 trauma center. Data concerning age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical state classification system (ASA), Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scales, mechanism of injury, presence of high-energy trauma, and type of injury (blunt or penetrating) were obtained. Laboratory parameters included comprehensive hematology, coagulation, arterial blood gas, kidney, and liver blood panels. Analytical focus was paid to the patient's vital status, the indication for an emergency intervention, and the risk of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1287 patients were included in the study. Patients with unstable vital signs or who required emergency inter-vention were most often dealing with abnormalities in pO2, glucose, D-dimer, creatinine, and alcohol values. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, and amylase were obtained in more than 80% of the patients, but in specific patient groups only abnormal in less than 9%. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients suffer mainly from abnormal values of D-dimer, pO2, glucose, creatinine, and alcohol. By contrast, MCV, INR, amylase, fibrinogen, and thrombocytes are regularly obtained as well, but only abnormal in a small amount of trauma patients. These findings suggest reconsiderations and more accuracy in the performance of laboratory testing, especially for trauma patients with stable vital signs

Effect of Physician-Staffed Emergency Medical Services (P-EMS) on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of the Literature

Introduction: Traumatic injury is the fourth leading cause of death in western countries and the leading cause of death in younger age. However, it is still unclear which groups of patients benefit most from advanced prehospital trauma care. A minimal amount is known about the effect of prehospital physician-based care on patients with specifically traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this review is to assess the effect of physician-staffed Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on the outcome of patients with severe TBI. Methods: Literature searches have been performed in the bibliographic databases of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Data concerning (physician-staffed) prehospital care for patients with severe TBI were only included if the control group was based on non-physician-staffed EMS. Primarily the mortality rate and secondarily the neurological outcome were examined. Additionally, data concerning hypotension, hypoxia, length of stay (hospital and intensive care unit) and the number of required early neurosurgical interventions were taken into account. Results: The overall mortality was decreased in three of the fourteen included studies after the implementation of a physician in the prehospital setting. One study found also a decrease in mortality only for patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 6–8. Strikingly, two other studies reported higher mortality, one for all the included patients and one for patients with GCS 10–12 only. Neurological outcome was improved in five studies after prehospital deployment of a physician. One study reported that more patients had a poor neurological outcome in the P-EMS group. Results of the remaining outcome measures differed widely. Conclusion: The included literature did not show a clear beneficial effect of P-EMS in the prehospital management of patients with severe TBI. The available evidence showed contradictory results, suggesting more research should be performed in this field with focus on decreasing heterogeneity in the compared groups

The effect of socioeconomic status on severe traumatic injury: a statistical analysis

Purpose: The amount of studies performed regarding a link between socioeconomic status (SES) and fatal outcome after traumatic injury is limited. Most research is focused on work-related injuries without taking other important characteristics into account. The aim of this study is to examine the association between SES and outcome after traumatic injury. Methods: The study involved polytrauma patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16] admitted to the Amsterdam University Medical Center (location VUmc) and Northwest Clinics Alkmaar (level 1 trauma centers). The SES of every patient was based on their postal code and represented with a “status score”. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to estimate the association between SES and mortality, length of stay at the hospital and length of stay at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Z-statistics were used to determine the difference between the expected and actual survival, based on Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and PSNL15 (probability of survival based on the Dutch population). Results: A total of 967 patients were included in this study. The lowest SES group was significantly associated with more penetrating injuries and a younger age (45 years versus 55 years). Additionally, severely injured patients with lower SES were noted to have a prolonged stay at the ICU. Furthermore, differences were found in the expected and observed survival, especially for the lower SES groups. Conclusion: Polytrauma patients with lower SES have more often penetrating injuries, are younger and have a longer stay at the ICU. No association was found between SES and length of hospital stay and neither between SES and mortality

Prehospital ultrasound in the management of trauma patients: Systematic review of the literature

Introduction: Emergency ultrasound methods such as Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) are a widely used imaging method. This examination can be performed to examine the presence of several life-threatening injuries. Early diagnosis may lead to better outcome, but the effect of timely diagnosis in the prehospital setting is not yet clear. Therefore, the aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the effect of prehospital ultrasound performed in (poly)trauma patients. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane's Library. Articles were included if prehospital ultrasound was performed as a diagnostic intervention in patients with trauma. The main outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, changes in prehospital diagnosis/treatment, changes in destination hospital and in-hospital response. Case reports and case series were excluded. Results: After screening 3343 articles, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included three retrospective and six prospective observational studies, with a total number of 2,889 patients. Five studies report at least one change in polytrauma management, ranging from 6% to 48,9% of the cases. The diagnostic accuracy of prehospital ultrasound was adequate in eight (out of nine) articles. High sensitivity and high specificity were found on several endpoints (pneumothorax, free abdominal fluid, haemoperitoneum, both on site and during transport). Conclusion: Prehospital ultrasound led to a change in polytrauma management in all studies that included this as an outcome measure. The diagnostic accuracy was described in eight studies, high sensitivity and specificity were found. Overall, the studies seem to suggest a positive influence of performing ultrasound. However, additional research with homogenous accuracy endpoints and uniformly trained prehospital care providers is recommended

Prehospital ultrasound in the management of trauma patients: Systematic review of the literature

Introduction: Emergency ultrasound methods such as Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) are a widely used imaging method. This examination can be performed to examine the presence of several life-threatening injuries. Early diagnosis may lead to better outcome, but the effect of timely diagnosis in the prehospital setting is not yet clear. Therefore, the aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the effect of prehospital ultrasound performed in (poly)trauma patients. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane's Library. Articles were included if prehospital ultrasound was performed as a diagnostic intervention in patients with trauma. The main outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, changes in prehospital diagnosis/treatment, changes in destination hospital and in-hospital response. Case reports and case series were excluded. Results: After screening 3343 articles, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included three retrospective and six prospective observational studies, with a total number of 2,889 patients. Five studies report at least one change in polytrauma management, ranging from 6% to 48,9% of the cases. The diagnostic accuracy of prehospital ultrasound was adequate in eight (out of nine) articles. High sensitivity and high specificity were found on several endpoints (pneumothorax, free abdominal fluid, haemoperitoneum, both on site and during transport). Conclusion: Prehospital ultrasound led to a change in polytrauma management in all studies that included this as an outcome measure. The diagnostic accuracy was described in eight studies, high sensitivity and specificity were found. Overall, the studies seem to suggest a positive influence of performing ultrasound. However, additional research with homogenous accuracy endpoints and uniformly trained prehospital care providers is recommended

Outcomes after Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest in the Netherlands: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is a severe and life-threatening situation that mandates urgent action. Outcomes after on-scene treatment of TCA in the Netherlands are currently unknown. The aim of the current study was to investigate the rate of survival to discharge in patients who suffered from traumatic cardiac arrest and who were subsequently treated on-scene by the Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients ≥ 18 years with TCA for which the Dutch HEMS were dispatched between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018. Patients with TCA after hanging, submersion, conflagration or electrocution were excluded. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge after prehospital TCA. Secondary outcome measures were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on-scene and neurological status at hospital discharge. Results: Nine-hundred-fifteen patients with confirmed TCA were included. ROSC was achieved on-scene in 261 patients (28.5%). Thirty-six (3.9%) patients survived to hospital discharge of which 17 (47.2%) had a good neurological outcome. Age < 70 years (0.7% vs. 5.2%; p=0.041) and a shockable rhythm on first ECG (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.02-0.28; p<0.001) were associated with increased odds of survival. Conclusion: Neurologic intact survival is possible after prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest. Younger patients and patients with a shockable ECG rhythm have higher survival rates after TCA. Level of evidence: prognostic study, level III

Outcomes after Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest in the Netherlands: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is a severe and life-threatening situation that mandates urgent action. Outcomes after on-scene treatment of TCA in the Netherlands are currently unknown. The aim of the current study was to investigate the rate of survival to discharge in patients who suffered from traumatic cardiac arrest and who were subsequently treated on-scene by the Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients ≥ 18 years with TCA for which the Dutch HEMS were dispatched between January 1 st 2014 and December 31 st 2018. Patients with TCA after hanging, submersion, conflagration or electrocution were excluded. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge after prehospital TCA. Secondary outcome measures were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on-scene and neurological status at hospital discharge. Results: Nine-hundred-fifteen patients with confirmed TCA were included. ROSC was achieved on-scene in 261 patients (28.5%). Thirty-six (3.9%) patients survived to hospital discharge of which 17 (47.2%) had a good neurological outcome. Age < 70 years (0.7% vs. 5.2%; p=0.041) and a shockable rhythm on first ECG (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.02-0.28; p<0.001) were associated with increased odds of survival. Conclusion: Neurologic intact survival is possible after prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest. Younger patients and patients with a shockable ECG rhythm have higher survival rates after TCA. Level of evidence: prognostic study, level III