Everything is on the map: Integrated Mental Health Atlases as support tools for service planning. SESPAS Report 2020

Objetivo: Este artículo revisa y evalúa el uso de los Atlas Integrales de Salud Mental como herramientas de apoyo a la planificación de servicios dentro del modelo de investigación de ecosistemas de atención de salud. Método: Se describen los tipos de atlas y el procedimiento para su elaboración. Se presentan los realizados en España y se evalúa su impacto en la planificación de servicios de salud mental. Los atlas agregan información sobre las características locales del sistema de atención, la disponibilidad geográfica de recursos recogida mediante el instrumento DESDE-LTC, y su uso. Utilizan un sistema de información geográfica y otras herramientas visuales. Siguen una metodología de abajo arriba con colaboración de personas decisoras de agencias de planificación para su elaboración y validación externa. Resultados: Desde 2005 se han realizado Atlas Integrales de Salud Mental en nueve comunidades autónomas que comprenden alrededor del 65% de la población de España. Los atlas han tenido un impacto desigual en la planificación de servicios, con un mayor impacto en Cataluña, Vizcaya y Guipúzcoa, y Andalucía, donde responsables sociales han participado activamente en su codise ˜no y su aplicación a la planificación de servicios sociosanitarios. Conclusiones: Los atlas permiten detectar carencias o duplicidades en la atención, monitorizar cambios a lo largo del tiempo, realizar comparaciones nacionales e internacionales, modelar la eficiencia y hacer análisis benchmark. Este conocimiento puede incorporarse a los sistemas de apoyo a la decisión para una más eficaz planificación de los servicios de salud mental basada en evidencia informada.Objective: This article reviews the usability of the Integrated Atlases of Mental Health as a decision support tool for service planning following a health ecosystem research approach. Method: This study describes the types of atlases and the procedure for their development. Atlases carried out in Spain are presented and their impact in mental health service planning is assessed. Atlases comprise information on the local characteristics of the health care system, geographical availability of resources collected with the DESDE-LTC instrument and their use. Atlases use geographic information systems and other visualisation tools. Atlases follow a bottom-up collaborative approach involving decision-makers from planning agencies for their development and external validation. Results: Since 2005, Integrated Atlases of Mental Health have been developed for nine regions in Spain comprising over 65% of the Spanish inhabitants. The impact on service planning has been unequal for the different regions. Catalonia, Biscay and Gipuzkoa, and Andalusia reach the highest impact. In these areas, health advisors have been actively involved in their co-design and implementation in service planning. Conclusions: Atlases allow detecting care gaps and duplications in care provision; monitoring changes of the system over time, and carrying out national and international comparisons, efficiency modelling and benchmarking. The knowledge provided by atlases could be incorporated to decision support systems in order to support an efficient mental health service planning based on evidence-informed policy

The mental health care gap in Intellectual Disabilities in Spain: Impact analysis and knowledge to action plan

BACKGROUND: Intellectual developmental disorder or Intellectual disability (ID) is a prevalent condition with a high impact along the life-span particularly when associated to other mental disorders (MD). SPECIFIC AIM: To estimate the unmet needs and to design a knowledge to action plan to reduce the care gap in ID-MD in Spain. METHOD: We followed a 5-step `maxi' impact assessment and a mixed qualitative/quantitative design including expert panels, secondary analysis of databases and a prospective survey in the 17 regions in Spain. Schizophrenia was used as comparator due to similar prevalence rates and burden. RESULTS: Persons with ID-MD had ten times less outpatient contacts and hospital admissions than patients with schizophrenia. The outpatient case load was 2.31% in ID and 14.6% in schizophrenia. ID had the lowest hospitalization rate amongst all mental disorders but the highest length of stay. The expert panel estimated that half of persons with ID-MD are not adequately assessed and 95% do not receive the required care in Spain. Basic care needs include 6.5 beds and an ID-MD outpatient service per 1 million population. At least 134 specialized psychiatrists and psychologists and 277 beds are needed to reach the minimum standards in Spain. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the ID-MD care gap in Spain and the basic specialized services needed. In spite of the societal and health implications of ID-MD the knowledge-to-action plan had a modest impact limited at the regions where ID-MD programmes were already implemented. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Specific priority setting on ID-MH should be incorporated to mental health strategy at the Ministry of Health within a broader health and ID plan. National and regional policies should incorporate an integrative care approach through the life cycle. The development of excellence centers on ID-MD and a national observatory on this topic should be encouraged