The real-world safety profile of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors among older adults (≥ 75 years): a retrospective, pharmacovigilance study

BackgroundAs indications for sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are expanding, a growing number of older adults have become candidates for treatment. We studied the safety profile of SGLT2i among older adults.MethodsA retrospective, pharmacovigilance study of the FDA's global database of safety reports. To assess reporting of pre-specified adverse events following SGLT2i among adults (< 75 years) and older adults (>= 75), we performed a disproportionality analysis using the sex-adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR).ResultsWe identified safety reports of 129,795 patients who received non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs (NIAD), including 24,253 who were treated with SGLT2i (median age 60 [IQR: 51-68] years, 2,339 [9.6%] aged >= 75 years). Compared to other NIAD, SGLT2i were significantly associated with amputations (adj.ROR = 355.1 [95%CI: 258.8 - 487.3] vs adj.ROR = 250.2 [79.3 - 789.5]), Fournier gangrene (adj.ROR = 45.0 [34.5 - 58.8] vs adj.ROR = 88.0 [27.0 - 286.6]), diabetic ketoacidosis (adj.ROR = 32.3 [30.0 - 34.8] vs adj.ROR = 23.3 [19.2 - 28.3]), genitourinary infections (adj.ROR = 10.3 [9.4 - 11.2] vs adj.ROR = 8.6 [7.2 - 10.3]), nocturia (adj.ROR = 5.5 [3.7 - 8.2] vs adj.ROR = 6.7 [2.8 - 15.7]), dehydration (adj.ROR = 2.5 [2.3 - 2.8] vs adj.ROR = 2.6 [2.1 - 3.3]), and fractures (adj.ROR = 1.7 [1.4 - 2.1] vs adj.ROR = 1.5 [1.02 - 2.1]) in both adults and older adults, respectively. None of these safety signals was significantly greater in older adults (P-interaction threshold of 0.05). Acute kidney injury was associated with SGLT2i in adults (adj.ROR = 1.97 [1.85 - 2.09]) but not in older adults (adj.ROR = 0.71 [0.59 - 0.84]). Falls, hypotension, and syncope were not associated with SGLT2i among either adults or older adults.ConclusionIn this global post-marketing study, none of the adverse events was reported more frequently among older adults. Our findings provide reassurance regarding SGLT2i treatment in older adults, although careful monitoring is warranted

Primary clear cell carcinoma of the vulva: A case report.

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the vulva is extremely rare. We report a case of a 54-year-old woman who presented with a 5 cm mass of the mons pubis. She underwent needle biopsy demonstrating CCC. She then underwent radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinofemoral lymph node dissection. Surgical pathology revealed CCC of the vulva with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and metastatic carcinoma in 1/7 inguinal lymph nodes. The patient has a history of endometriosis, raising suspicion that her CCC could have arisen from endometriosis in the mons. She completed adjuvant treatment with cisplatin and concurrent external beam radiation therapy with radiographic evidence of complete response. However, short-interval imaging demonstrated multi-focal recurrence, which was confirmed with supraclavicular lymph node biopsy. She then completed 8 cycles carboplatin, paclitaxel, and biosimilar bevacizumab-bvzr with favorable response on imaging. She was continued on bevacizumab maintenance. She was later started on pembroluzimab for disease progression based on new mediastinal adenopathy and worsening retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. She received eight cycles of pembrolizumab with ongoing disease progression before enrolling in hospice and discontinuing cancer-directed treatment. As described in the related literature which we summarize here, the majority of reported cases of vulvar CCC arise from endometriosis implants at the site of prior episiotomy or from the Bartholins gland. This patient had clinical history of endometriosis; prior tissue sampling was not performed to support the diagnosis. Given the absence of data regarding this rare type of primary vulvar cancer, treatment of this patients disease was based on existing data specific to squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and extrapolated from treatment guidelines for CCC of the ovary and endometrium. Continued research is needed on this rare form of vulvar carcinoma to determine the risk factors, prognostic factors, and treatment recommendations specific to this disease

Complex Family Planning fellowship graduates’ intended practice plans and barriers to practicing in areas of unmet need

ObjectivesTo describe practice patterns and challenges encountered by Complex Family Planning (CFP) fellowship graduates.Study designWe invited all 110 obstetrics and gynecology physicians who graduated from the CFP fellowship from 2017-2020 via email to complete an anonymous online survey. We inquired about demographics, intended and obtained postfellowship positions, and successes and challenges in obtaining jobs. We used Fisher's exact test to assess if the proportion of graduates who grew up, attended residency, and completed fellowship in a US region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) and practiced in that same region differed.ResultsNinety-nine (90.0%) graduates completed the survey. When entering fellowship, most (n = 92 [92.9%]) expected to practice in an academic environment. About half (n = 49 [49.5%]) pursued fellowship with the intent to practice in a location with an unmet need for abortion providers, of which 22 (44.9%) did so. Forty-nine (49.5%) respondents did not practice after fellowship where they initially intended, citing common challenges of job availability, family-related concerns, safety concerns, and relationship status changes. We found associations between regions where graduates completed residency and currently practice (p = 0.004), driven primarily by higher associations in the South (76.9%) and West (70.6%) and a lower association in the Midwest (22.7%). We found no association between current practice region and where graduates grew up (p = 0.15) or completed fellowship (p = 0.23).ConclusionsCFP fellowship graduates from 2017-2020 primarily intended to practice in academic environments with half planning to practice in underserved locations. However, more than half of those who entered fellowship hoping to fill an unmet need for abortion providers did not do so.ImplicationsAbout half of CFP fellowship graduates from 2017-2020 intended to obtain positions in areas they defined as having an unmet need for abortion provision. Personal life and job barriers prevented many from serving in such positions after fellowship. Practice location intentions and outcomes may be different in a post-Dobbs environment

Complex Family Planning Fellowship Graduates' Practice Plans and Barriers to Practicing in Areas of Unmet Need

ObjectivesTo describe practice patterns and challenges encountered by Complex Family Planning (CFP) fellowship graduates.Study designWe invited all 110 obstetrics and gynecology physicians who graduated from the CFP fellowship from 2017-2020 via email to complete an anonymous online survey. We inquired about demographics, intended and obtained postfellowship positions, and successes and challenges in obtaining jobs. We used Fisher's exact test to assess if the proportion of graduates who grew up, attended residency, and completed fellowship in a US region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) and practiced in that same region differed.ResultsNinety-nine (90.0%) graduates completed the survey. When entering fellowship, most (n = 92 [92.9%]) expected to practice in an academic environment. About half (n = 49 [49.5%]) pursued fellowship with the intent to practice in a location with an unmet need for abortion providers, of which 22 (44.9%) did so. Forty-nine (49.5%) respondents did not practice after fellowship where they initially intended, citing common challenges of job availability, family-related concerns, safety concerns, and relationship status changes. We found associations between regions where graduates completed residency and currently practice (p = 0.004), driven primarily by higher associations in the South (76.9%) and West (70.6%) and a lower association in the Midwest (22.7%). We found no association between current practice region and where graduates grew up (p = 0.15) or completed fellowship (p = 0.23).ConclusionsCFP fellowship graduates from 2017-2020 primarily intended to practice in academic environments with half planning to practice in underserved locations. However, more than half of those who entered fellowship hoping to fill an unmet need for abortion providers did not do so.ImplicationsAbout half of CFP fellowship graduates from 2017-2020 intended to obtain positions in areas they defined as having an unmet need for abortion provision. Personal life and job barriers prevented many from serving in such positions after fellowship. Practice location intentions and outcomes may be different in a post-Dobbs environment

Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice.

We aimed to examine the preparedness of recent gynecologic oncology fellowship graduates for independent practice.We conducted a web-based survey study using REDCap targeting Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members who graduated gynecologic oncology fellowship within the last six years. The survey included 52 items assessing fellowship training experiences, level of comfort in performing core gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and administering cancer-directed therapies. Questions also addressed factors driving participants selection of fellowship programs, educational experience, research and preparedness for independent practice. A total of 296 participants were invited to complete the survey. Response rate was 42% with n = 124 completed surveys included for analysis. The highest ranked factor for fellowship selection was fit with program 36% (n = 45). Upon completing fellowship, most were uncomfortable performing ureteral conduit formation 84% (n = 103), ureteroneocystostomy 77% (n = 94), exenteration 68% (n = 83), splenectomy 67% (n = 83) and lower anterior resection 41% (n = 51). Most were comfortable managing intraoperative complications 85% (n = 104) and standard cancer staging procedures (range: 61%-99%). Majority were comfortable providing cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy 99% (n = 123), immunotherapy 84% (n = 104), and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors 97% (n = 120). Upon completing fellowship, 77% (n = 95) report having mentorship that met their expectations during fellowship and 94% (n = 116) felt they were ready for independent practice. Majority of fellowship graduates were prepared for independent practice and felt comfortable performing routine surgical procedures and cancer directed treatment. However, most are not comfortable with ultra-radical gynecologic oncology procedures. Maximizing surgical opportunities during fellowship training and acquiring early career mentorship may help

Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice

We aimed to examine the preparedness of recent gynecologic oncology fellowship graduates for independent practice.We conducted a web-based survey study using REDCap targeting Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members who graduated gynecologic oncology fellowship within the last six years. The survey included 52 items assessing fellowship training experiences, level of comfort in performing core gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and administering cancer-directed therapies. Questions also addressed factors driving participants’ selection of fellowship programs, educational experience, research and preparedness for independent practice. A total of 296 participants were invited to complete the survey. Response rate was 42% with n = 124 completed surveys included for analysis. The highest ranked factor for fellowship selection was fit with program 36% (n = 45). Upon completing fellowship, most were uncomfortable performing ureteral conduit formation 84% (n = 103), ureteroneocystostomy 77% (n = 94), exenteration 68% (n = 83), splenectomy 67% (n = 83) and lower anterior resection 41% (n = 51). Most were comfortable managing intraoperative complications 85% (n = 104) and standard cancer staging procedures (range: 61%–99%). Majority were comfortable providing cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy 99% (n = 123), immunotherapy 84% (n = 104), and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors 97% (n = 120). Upon completing fellowship, 77% (n = 95) report having mentorship that met their expectations during fellowship and 94% (n = 116) felt they were ready for independent practice. Majority of fellowship graduates were prepared for independent practice and felt comfortable performing routine surgical procedures and cancer directed treatment. However, most are not comfortable with ultra-radical gynecologic oncology procedures. Maximizing surgical opportunities during fellowship training and acquiring early career mentorship may help