Four Work-Ins by Australian Journalists, 1944-80

During industrial disputes with employers between 1944 and 1980 the Australian Journalist's Association occasionally turned to the tactic of the work-in, producing wild cat newspapers during strikes in Sydney. These newspapers (The News, and The Clarion) exemplified problematic elements of the work-in as a working-class strategy. While single incident studies of the work-in have been conducted in Australia, the Australian Journalist Association work-ins present a time series of struggle. This time series allows for a broader evaluation of the radical content of the work-in and indicates that the tactic can become systematised, less radical, and less participatory when not connected to a broader generation of workplace radical behaviour by workers. In short: the work-in, much like the strike or go slow, can become a tame cat tactic – it is not inherently transgressive or opposed to capitalist production. Expectedly, the first work-ins were more radical in scope, presenting a newspaper which fully duplicated the commodity produced under capitalist control and in some ways exceeded the scope presented by capitalist organised journalism in both a material and a cultural sense. However, this radical economic potential dissipated by the end of the time series of work-ins. Instead of providing an alternative commodity fit for market, the tactic produced propaganda pieces aimed primarily at the members of the community who would be predisposed to favour the journalist's case. The 1980s Clarion was not a daily newspaper of news, sport, racing, women's interest, classifieds, and general opinion. This change will be explained in terms of human causes such as skills loss, production process causes such as computerisation and wire services, and broader social causes such as the changing role of the newspaper in Australian society.The symposium is organised on behalf of AAHANZBS by the Business and Labour History Group, The University of Sydney, with the financial support of the University’s Faculty of Economics and Business

No role for glutathione S-transferase genotypes in Caucasian esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma etiology: an European case-control study

Contains fulltext : 118871.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Identifying and monitoring high-risk patients can aid the prevention of esophageal cancer (EC). The interaction of environmental risk factor exposure and genetic susceptibility may contribute to the etiology of EC. Biotransformation enzymes such as Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTs ) detoxify mutagenic and genotoxic compounds and therefore control the rate of detoxification of carcinogens. Functional polymorphisms in the genes coding for GSTs alter their enzyme activity in vitro, and were reported to modify EC risk in Asians. We hypothesized that altered enzyme activity GST genotypes influence the susceptibility for esophageal adeno- (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Caucasians. METHODS: We performed a case-control study including 440 Caucasian patients with EC and 592 healthy Caucasian controls matched for age and sex. Functional polymorphisms were selected and genotypes were determined in GST classes Alpha, Mu, Theta and Pi by means of polymerase chain reaction. Genotypes were classified into predicted high, intermediate and low enzyme activity categories based on in vitro activity data. The distribution of the activity genotypes were compared between patients with EAC or ESCC, and controls. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by logistic regression analyses. Gene-gene interactions were tested and for comparison purposes, the predicted low and intermediate activity genotypes were combined. Genotypes with similar risks for EAC or ESCC were combined and analyzed for multiplicative effects. RESULTS: Our analyses includes 327 patients with EAC and 106 patients with ESCC. Low or intermediate activity enzyme genotypes for GSTM1, GSTA1, GSTP1 I105V and A114V as well as for GSTT1, did not significantly modify the risk for ESCC or EAC in our Dutch population. CONCLUSION: Functional genotypes in GST genes are not involved in EAC or ESCC susceptibility in Caucasians, in contrast to results on ESCC from Asia or Africa

Genotype distribution in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and controls.

<p>*Note that some patients or controls are missing because of failure of the genotyping.</p><p>**Adjusted for age.</p><p>GI, gastrointestinal; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.</p

Associations of the SNPs rs6214 and rs6898743 with gastrointestinal cancer.

<p>Only significant associations are visualized. Associations are given as follows: rs number of the SNP, genotype, odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence interval. The homozygous most common genotype is taken as reference. EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.</p

Genotype distribution and ORs (95% CI) for the genotypes of SNPs rs6214 and rs6898743 in patients with EAC, ESCC, proximal CRC or distal CRC.

<p>EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; CRC, colorectal cancer.</p

Characteristics of the study population.

<p>n = number of patients or controls; GI, gastrointestinal; SD = standard deviation; EAC = esophageal adenocarcinoma; ESCC = esophageal squamous cell carcinoma;</p>1<p><i>p</i>-value mean age = 0.000;</p>2<p><i>p</i>-value mean age = 0.001.</p

Sequences of primers and probes, including the optimal annealing temperature and MgCl₂-concentration.

<p>F = forward; R = reverse; WT = wild type; VAR = variant; the bold underlined letters represent the wild type (most common) allele (Allele 1) and the variant allele (Allele 2) in the WT probe and VAR probe, respectively.</p

EPHX1 polymorphisms do not modify esophageal carcinoma susceptibility in Dutch Caucasians.

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a globally increasing incidence with poor curative treatment options and survival rates. Crucial risk factors are exposure to toxins or carcinogens. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is a biotransformation enzyme essential for the detoxification of xenobiotics. Polymorphisms in exon 3 and exon 4 of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene (EPHX1) modify catalytic activity of this enzyme and subsequently may play a role in EC etiology. This case-control study investigated whether these polymorphisms in the EPHX1 gene influence esophageal cancer susceptibility in a Dutch Caucasian population. A case-control study including 349 Caucasian EC patients and 581 Caucasian healthy controls was conducted and the polymorphisms Tyr113His (exon 3) and His139Arg (exon 4) in the EPHX1 gene were determined, using polymerase chain reaction. The distribution of exon 3 and exon 4 genotypes were compared between cases and controls. Analyses included a stratification according to tumor histology; esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) or squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Furthermore, on the basis of allelic in vitro enzyme activity assays, exon 3 and 4 genotypes were combined and categorized according to their predicted high, medium or low enzyme activity. Homozygosity and heterozygosity for both exon 3 and 4 polymorphisms were correlated with a decreased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk. Heterozygosity and homozygosity for both polymorphisms correlated with an increased and a decreased esophageal adenocarcinoma risk, respectively. Predicted intermediate and high activity genotypes were risk and protective factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma, respectively. However, none of these associations were statistically significant. In conclusion, the polymorphisms in exon 3 and exon 4 of the EPHX1 gene do not seem to be modifiers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Dutch Caucasians