47 research outputs found

    A multifactorial approach including tumoural epidermal growth factor receptor, p53, thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase to predict treatment outcome in head and neck cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil

    Get PDF
    The prognostic value of tumoural epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) was analysed on 82 advanced head and neck cancer patients (71 men, 11 women; mean age 59). Induction treatment was cisplatin–5-FU ± folinic acid (61 patients, Chem group) or concomitant cisplatin–5-FU–radiotherapy (21 patients, RChem group). EGFR (binding assay), p53 protein (Sangtec immunoluminometric assay), TS and DPD activities (radioenzymatic assays) were measured on biopsies obtained at time of diagnosis. Significant positive correlation was demonstrated between p53 and EGFR. In the RChem group, p53 was higher in non-complete responders (median 1.03 ng mg−1) than in complete responders (median 0.08 ng mg−1) (P = 0.057). Univariate Cox analyses stratified on treatment group showed that specific survival (33 events) was significantly related to T staging, p53 taken as continuous or categorial (below vs over 0.80 ng mg−1) variable, and EGFR (below vs over 220 fmol mg−1); survival increased when EGFR and p53 were below thresholds. Multivariate stepwise analysis including T staging, EGFR and p53 revealed that T staging and EGFR were independent predictors of survival; relative risks were 3.68 for T staging and 2.65 for EGFR. Overall, EGFR remained an independent prognostic factor when response to treatment and T staging were considered in the multivariate analysis. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

    Review article: monoclonal antibodies versus TKIs for targeting EGFR

    No full text

    Mechanical properties of cubic zirconia irradiated with swift heavy ions

    No full text
    Expérience GANIL : Polycrystals were irradiated at room temperature with 940 MeV Pb ions at the GANIL accelerator in CaenThe modifications of the mechanical properties of cubic (yttria-stabilized) zirconia induced by swift heavy ion irradiation are investigated. Polycrystalline pellets were irradiated at room temperature with 940 MeV Pb ions at the GANIL accelerator in Caen at fluences ranging from 5 1011 to 4 1013 cm 2. The microhardness and the fracture toughness of irradiated YSZ were studied by Vickers micro-indentation. Although YSZ is damaged by irradiation, an increase of the microhardness and fracture toughness with increasing ion fluence is observed. A strengthening of YSZ, associated with residual compressive stresses induced in the surface layer by irradiation, explain these results

    L’exentĂ©ration orbitaire a-t-elle encore sa place en 2019 ?

    No full text
    International audienceINTRODUCTION:Orbital exenteration is a radical anatomically and psychologically disfiguring procedure. It is mostly performed for management of orbital cancers or cancers with orbital involvement. The lack of benefit in terms of overall survival and the development of new molecular therapies (targeted therapies, immunotherapy) in recent years leads us to question its use. The goal of our review is to answer to the following question: is orbital exenteration a viable procedure in 2019?MATERIALS AND METHODS:A literature review was performed using the PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. The following terms were used then crossed with each other: "orbital exenteration", "exenterated socket", "overall survival", "life expectancy", "orbital reconstruction", "socket reconstruction". Oncology articles from the past 15 years were included and separated into those in the oculoplastic literature and those in the ENT literature.RESULTS:Nineteen articles were included in this review. Eyelid tumours represent the main etiology of orbital exenteration. Basal cell carcinoma is the most frequently incriminated tumor, while sebaceous carcinoma and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma are the most frequently encountered in Asian series. Non-conservative orbital exenteration is the most prevalent surgery performed. Orbital reconstruction depends on the surgeon's speciality: healing by secondary intention and split thickness skin grafts are mostly performed by oculoplastic surgeons, whereas regional or free flaps are mostly performed by ENT surgeons. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage is the most common intraoperative complication, encountered in 0 to 13 % of cases. The most common postoperative complications are ethmoid fistula and infection of the operative site, encountered in 0 to 50 % and 0 to 43 % of cases respectively. Orbital exenteration allows surgical resection of R0 tumors in 42.5 % to 97 % of cases. Overall survival following orbital exenteration is 83 % (50.5-97) and 65 % (37-92) at 1 and 5 years respectively. Identified risk factors for poor overall survival are: age, tumor histology (worse prognosis with choroidal melanoma, better prognosis with basal cell carcinoma), non-R0 surgical resection, locally advanced tumors (size>20mm, BCVA<20/400 and the presence of metastases at diagnosis). Recent studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes when managing locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, lacrimal gland cancer and conjunctival melanoma with targeted therapies or immunotherapies without performing orbital exenteration.CONCLUSION:Orbital exenteration remains a major part of our therapeutic arsenal. Although orbital exenteration has failed to demonstrate any overall survival benefit, it allows satisfactory local control of the disease with an increasingly less invasive procedure. The development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies may change our therapeutic decisions in the future

    La supplémentation des aliments d'allaitement pour Veaux de boucherie avec de la Chlorhydroxyquinoléine -(C.H.Q.)-

    No full text
    Ladrat J., Jousselin W., Bories G., Magat A., Parodi A. L., Bonnet Ph., Poissonnet P. La supplĂ©mentation des aliments d’allaitement pour veaux de boucherie avec de la ChlorhydroxyquinolĂ©ine (C. H. Q.). In: Bulletin de l'AcadĂ©mie VĂ©tĂ©rinaire de France tome 124 n°7, 1971. pp. 339-352
    corecore