38 research outputs found

    Surface Grafting of Poly(L-glutamates). 2. Helix Orientation

    Get PDF
    In this paper the average helix orientation of surface-grafted poly(γ-benzyl L-glutamate) (PBLG), poly(γ-methyl L-glutamate) (PMLG), and poly(γ-methyl L-glutamate)-co-(γ-n-stearyl L-glutamate) (PMLGSLG 70/30) was investigated by means of FT-IR transmission spectroscopy. The theoretical relation between the average tilt angle (θ) and the absorption peak areas of three different backbone amide bands could be calculated because their transition dipole moment directions with respect to the helix axis were known. From the normalized absorptions, the average tilt angles of grafted helices of PBLG, PMLG, and PMLGSLG 70/30 were determined. The somewhat larger average angle of PMLG helices of 35 ± 5° with respect to the substrate compared to the value of 32 ± 5° of PBLG was due to the higher grafting density of PMLG. Because of the smaller helix diameter as a result of the smaller size of the methyl side group, more PMLG helices grew on the same surface area. Sterical hindrance and unfavorable polar interactions between unidirectional aligned helices forced the PMLG helices in a more upright arrangement. The even more perpendicular orientation of PMLGSLG 70/30 (48 ± 6°) could be the result of incorporation of mainly γ-methyl L-glutamate N-carboxyanhydride (MLG-NCA) monomers during the initiation step. Incorporation of the much larger γ-n-stearyl L-glutamate N-carboxyanhydride (SLG-NCA) monomers afterward lead to enlarged angles with respect to the substrate. Due to swelling, a pronounced change in helix orientation of grafted PMLGSLG 70/30 in n-hexadecane was observed, resulting in an almost perpendicular helix orientation.

    <i>FoxO1</i> mutant teeth deposit an enamel matrix and form enamel rods.

    No full text
    <p>Scanning electron microscopy of fractured 15 month old <i>FoxO1</i> mutant incisors revealed that, in regions where enamel had not chipped away, the mutant teeth initially had an enamel thickness that was comparable to their littermate controls (compare A and B). Higher magnification revealed that the mutant enamel also exhibited the typical decussating pattern of enamel rods (compare C and D).</p

    <i>FoxO1</i> mutant enamel is softer than controls.

    No full text
    <p>The Vickers microhardness test revealed that the adult <i>FoxO1</i> mutant teeth are significantly softer than their littermate controls.</p

    Loss of <i>FoxO1</i> and <i>Smad3</i> results in the down-regulation of a common set of genes.

    No full text
    <p>Quantitative rtPCR was performed on mRNA isolated from adult <i>FoxO1</i> mutant (A) and <i>Smad3</i> mutant (B) incisors and compared to control littermates. Both mutants exhibited a similar trend in the down-regulation of genes known to be necessary for proper enamel development and maturation (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).</p

    Mapping of putative FoxO/Smad genomic binding sites.

    No full text
    <p><i>In silico</i> analysis of putative FoxO, Smad, and CEBPβ binding elements, conserved between mice and humans and residing within several genes down-regulated in the <i>FoxO1</i> and <i>Smad</i> mutants (see text for further details). The colored numbers indicate additional SBEs or CBEs that, due to scaling, could not be represented on the gene tracks.</p

    Within the tooth, Rx-Cre activity is confined to the ameloblast layer.

    No full text
    <p><i>Rx-Cre<sup>+/tg</sup></i> mice were crossed to the <i>ROSA26<sup>+/lacZ</sup></i> Cre reporter line and Cre activity was assessed via X-gal staining. Rx-Cre exhibited broad activity throughout the anterior head in such tissues as the retina, tongue, skin, hair follicles, and teeth (A). Closer inspection of the incisors (B and C) and the molars (D and E) revealed that Cre activity was confined to the ameloblast layer (Am) and completely absent from the odontoblast layer (Od). The Cre activity in the molars was more mosaic than the incisors (arrows in E).</p
    corecore