2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group

Over the last 15 years, various oncology groups throughout the world have used the PRETEXT system for staging malignant primary liver tumours of childhood. This paper, written by members of the radiology and surgery committees of the International Childhood Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL), presents various clarifications and revisions to the original PRETEXT system

Guidelines for surgical treatment of hepatoblastoma in the modern era - Recommendations from the childhood liver tumour strategy group of the international society of paediatric oncology (SIOPEL)

Cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and complete surgical resection are both crucial in the cure of hepatoblastoma. Radical resection can be obtained either conventionally by partial hepatectomy or with orthotopic liver transplant, but the surgical approach to hepatoblastoma differs considerably across the world. Our main aim in this paper is to present the surgical recommendations of the Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOPEL), as well as to stimulate international debate on this issue. We discuss biopsy, verification of resectability, resection principles, indications and potential contraindications for orthotopic liver transplant, as well as thoracic surgery for pulmonary metastases. We suggest that heroic liver resections with a high probability of leaving residual tumour should be avoided whenever possible. In such cases primary orthotopic liver transplant should be considered. Superior survival rates in hepatoblastoma patients who have received a primary transplant after a good response to chemotherapy support the strategy of avoiding partial hepatectomy in cases where radical resection appears difficult and doubtful. We recommend early referral to a transplant surgeon in cases of. (i) multifocal or large solitary PRETEXT IV (PRE Treatment EXTent of disease scoring system) hepatoblastoma involving all four sectors of the liver and (ii) unifocal, centrally located tumours involving main hilar structures or main hepatic veins. Because complete tumour resection is a prerequisite for cure, any strategy leading to an increased resection rate will result in improved survival. We advise the more frequent use of orthotopic liver transplant, as well as the standardisation of techniques for partial liver resection. These guidelines should not be seen as final, but rather as a starting point for further discussion between the various national and international liver tumour study groups. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve

Multifocal Hepatoblastoma: Is There a Place for Partial Hepatectomy? Proceedings of the Tumor Board of the Hematology–Oncology Division of the Department of Pediatrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Today we will address the treatment of a child affected by a multifocal hepatoblastoma (HB). His tumors have shrunk significantly at the end of an 85-day course of preoperative chemotherapy, but still do not seem to be easily resectable. The patient is a 6-year-old boy admitted to the Pediatric Surgical Unit because of an abdominal mass discovered incidentally during a routine medical checkup almost 4 months ago. His family and past medical history were unremarkable. On admission, the physical examination confirmed the presence of a right abdominal mass, and an ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT scan) were obtained. At presentation, the serum a-fetoprotein was 380,000 ng/ml with a normal platelet count. Before proceeding, may I ask you please, Dr. Toffolutti, to describe the imaging findings

Surgical view of the treatment of patients with hepatoblastoma: results from the first prospective trial of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Liver Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with hepatoblastoma (HB). The Society of Pediatric Oncology Liver Tumor Study Group launched its first prospective trial (SIOPEL-1) with the intention to treat all patients with preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgical resection. The objective of this article was to assess the assumed surgical advantages of primary chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1994, 154 patients age < 16 years with HB were registered on SIOPEL-1. The pretreatment extent of disease was assessed, and, after undergoing biopsy, patients were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously over 24 hours and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously over 48 hours by continuous infusion (PLADO). Generally, tumors were resected after four of a total of six courses of PLADO. RESULTS: One hundred twenty eight patients underwent surgical resection (13 patients underwent primary surgery, and 115 patients underwent delayed surgery after PLADO). A pretreatment surgical biopsy was performed in 96 of 128 patients (75%). Biopsy complications occurred in 7 of 96 patients (7%). Twenty-two patients showed pulmonary metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 7 patients underwent thoracotomy. Operative morbidity and mortality were 18% and 5%, respectively. Complete macroscopic surgical resection was achieved in 106 patients (92%), including 6 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. The actuarial 5-year event free survival (EFS) rate for all 154 patients in the study was 66%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 75%. For the 115 patients who were included in the surgical analysis that followed the exact protocol, the EFS and OS rates were 75% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy is a safe procedure and should be performed routinely. Preoperative chemotherapy seems to make tumor resection easier. Reresection of a positive resection margin does not necessarily have to be performed, because postoperative chemotherapy showed good results. Resection of lung metastases can be curative if there is local control of the primary tumor; however, results showed that the patient's prognosis was worse. Surgical morbidity or mortality rates were not necessarily higher in large multicenter studies. More importantly, countries of lesser economic status also can contribute effectively to these trial

Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus doxorubicin for standard-risk hepatoblastoma.

Contains fulltext : 79859.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Preoperative cisplatin alone may be as effective as cisplatin plus doxorubicin in standard-risk hepatoblastoma (a tumor involving three or fewer sectors of the liver that is associated with an alpha-fetoprotein level of >100 ng per milliliter). METHODS: Children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma who were younger than 16 years of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. After they received one cycle of cisplatin (80 mg per square meter of body-surface area per 24 hours), we randomly assigned patients to receive cisplatin (every 14 days) or cisplatin plus doxorubicin administered in three preoperative cycles and two postoperative cycles. The primary outcome was the rate of complete resection, and the trial was powered to test the noninferiority of cisplatin alone (<10% difference in the rate of complete resection). RESULTS: Between June 1998 and December 2006, 126 patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin and 129 were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin plus doxorubicin. The rate of complete resection was 95% in the cisplatin-alone group and 93% in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group in the intention-to-treat analysis (difference, 1.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.1 to 7.0); these rates were 99% and 95%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 83% (95% CI, 77 to 90) and 95% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the cisplatin group, and 85% (95% CI, 79 to 92) and 93% (95% CI, 88 to 98) in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group (median follow-up, 46 months). Acute grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (74.4% vs. 20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with cisplatin plus doxorubicin, cisplatin monotherapy achieved similar rates of complete resection and survival among children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma. Doxorubicin can be safely omitted from the treatment of standard-risk hepatoblastoma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003912.

Maxime : de la parentalisation à la construction du soi

Purpose Preoperative staging (pretreatment extent of disease [PRETEXT]) was developed for the first prospective liver tumor study by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOPEL-1 study; preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery). Study aims were to analyze the accuracy and interobserver agreement of PRETEXT and to compare the predictive impact of three currently used staging systems. Patients and Methods Hepatoblastoma (HB) patients younger than 16 years who underwent surgical resection (128 of 154 patients) were analyzed. The centrally reviewed preoperative staging was compared with postoperative pathology (accuracy) in 91 patients (81%), and the local center staging was compared with the central review (interobserver agreement) in 97 patients (86%), using the agreement beyond change method (weighted kappa). The predictive values of the three staging systems were compared in 110 patients (97%) using survival curves and Cox proportional hazard ratio estimates. Results Preoperative PRETEXT staging compared with pathology was correct in 51 %, overstaged in 37%, and understaged in 12% of patients (weighted kappa = 0.44; 95% Cl, 0.26 to 0.62). The weighted kappa value of the interobserver agreement was 0.76 (95% Cl, 0.64 to 0.88). The Children's Cancer Study Group/Pediatric Oncology Group-based staging system showed no predictive value for survival (P =.516), but the tumor-node-metastasis-based system and PRETEXT system showed good predictive values (P =.0021 and P =.0006, respectively). PRETEXT seemed to be superior in the statistical fit. Conclusion PRETEXT has moderate accuracy with a tendency to overstage patients, shows good interobserver agreement (reproducibility), shows superior predictive value for survival, offers the opportunity to monitor the effect of preoperative therapy, and can also be applied in patients who have not had operations. For comparability reasons, we recommend that all HB. patients included in trials also be staged according to PRETEX

Prognostic stratification for children with hepatoblastoma: The SIOPEL experience

Purpose: To identify factors relevant to long-term outcome in newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma, and define subgroups for clinical research on tailoring treatment to the individual patient. Patients and methods: Between 1995 and 2006 the SIOPEL group conducted two clinical trials which established risk-adapted therapy for hepatoblastoma patients. Patients were stratified into high-risk (AFP 1,200,000 ng/mL, patient age, platelet count and histology were further explored. The outcome measure was event-free survival (EFS). Results: In 541 patients, reduced EFS correlated significantly with AFP = 1.2 x 10(6) ng/mL (2.48, 1.47-4.17), metastatic disease (3.02, 2.05-4.44), PRETEXT IV (2.15, 1.19-3.87), multifocality (1.59, 1.01-2.50), age>5 years (2.76, 1.68-4.53); borderline with small cell undifferentiated (SCU) histology (2.29, 95% confidence interval 0.91-5.77); but not with PRETEXT III, age 30-60 months, platelet count or V+/P+/E+. By using the significant factors and SCU to stratify the population, we have identified three distinct prognostic groups: PRETEXT I/II/III, and no other factors, have 3 year EFS of 90%, PRETEXT IV and/or multifocal tumour and/or age > 5 years and/or AFP > 1.2 x 10(6) have 3 year EFS of 71% and SCU and/or AFP <100 ng/mL and/or metastatic have a 3 year EFS of 49%. Conclusion: Prognostic stratification for clinical research on newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma should take into consideration PRETEXT, metastatic disease, AFP, multifocality, age and SCU histology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserve