Screening for trisomies by cfDNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy: update of the Fetal Medicine Foundation results and meta-analysis.

Objective: To report on the routine clinical implementation of cell-free (cf)DNA analysis of maternal blood for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies and to define the performance of the test by combining our results with those arising from systematic review of the literature. Methods: The data for the study were derived from prospective screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies at 10+0-14+1 weeks’ gestation. Two populations were included; first self-referred women to the Fetal Medicine Centre in London or Brugmann University Hospital in Brussels and second, women selected for the cfDNA test after routine first-trimester combined testing in one of two National Health Service hospitals in England. This dataset was used to determine the performance of screening for the three trisomies. Search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP (World Health Organization) was carried out to identify all peer-reviewed publications on clinical validation or implementation of maternal cfDNA testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies. Meta-analysis was then performed using our data and data from the studies identified by the literature search. Results: In our dataset of 997 twin pregnancies with a cfDNA result and known outcome, the test classified correctly 16 (94.1%) of the 17 cases of trisomy 21, 9 (90.0%) of 10 of trisomy 18, 1 (50.0%) of 2 of trisomy 13 and 963 (99.5%) of 968 cases without any of the three trisomies. The literature search identified 7 relevant studies, excluding our papers because their data are included in the current study. In the combined total of our study and the 7 studies identified by the literature search there were 56 trisomy 21 and 3,718 non-trisomy 21 twin pregnancies; the pooled weighted detection rate (DR) and false positive rate (FPR) were 98.2% (95% CI 83.2, 99.8%) and 0.05% (95% CI 0.01, 0.26%), respectively. In the combined total of 18 cases of trisomy 18 and 3,143 non-trisomy 18 pregnancies the pooled weighted DR and FPR were 88.9% (95% CI 64.8, 97.2%) and 0.03% (95% CI 0.00, 0.33%), respectively. For trisomy 13, there were only 3 affected cases and 2 (66.7%) of these were detected by the cfDNA test at FPR of 0.19% (5/2,569). Conclusions: Performance of cfDNA testing for trisomies 21 in twin pregnancies is similar to that reported for singleton pregnancies. The number of cases of trisomies 18 and 13 is too small for accurate assessment of predictive performance of the cfDNA test.pre-print445 K

Mental impact of Covid-19 among Spanish healthcare workers. A large longitudinal survey

Altres ajuts: Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER); Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL, GRS COVID 32/A/20).Aims Longitudinal data on the mental health impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic in healthcare workers is limited. We estimated prevalence, incidence and persistence of probable mental disorders in a cohort of Spanish healthcare workers (Covid-19 waves 1 and 2) -and identified associated risk factors. Methods 8996 healthcare workers evaluated on 5 May-7 September 2020 (baseline) were invited to a second web-based survey (October-December 2020). Major depressive disorder (PHQ-8 ≥ 10), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥ 10), panic attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder (PCL-5 ≥ 7), and alcohol use disorder (CAGE-AID ≥ 2) were assessed. Distal (pre-pandemic) and proximal (pandemic) risk factors were included. We estimated the incidence of probable mental disorders (among those without disorders at baseline) and persistence (among those with disorders at baseline). Logistic regression of individual-level [odds ratios (OR)] and population-level (population attributable risk proportions) associations were estimated, adjusting by all distal risk factors, health care centre and time of baseline interview. Results 4809 healthcare workers participated at four months follow-up (cooperation rate = 65.7%; mean = 120 days s.d. = 22 days from baseline assessment). Follow-up prevalence of any disorder was 41.5%, (v. 45.4% at baseline, p < 0.001); incidence, 19.7% (s.e. = 1.6) and persistence, 67.7% (s.e. = 2.3). Proximal factors showing significant bivariate-adjusted associations with incidence included: work-related factors [prioritising Covid-19 patients (OR = 1.62)], stress factors [personal health-related stress (OR = 1.61)], interpersonal stress (OR = 1.53) and financial factors [significant income loss (OR = 1.37)]. Risk factors associated with persistence were largely similar. Conclusions Our study indicates that the prevalence of probable mental disorders among Spanish healthcare workers during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic was similarly high to that after the first wave. This was in good part due to the persistence of mental disorders detected at the baseline, but with a relevant incidence of about 1 in 5 of HCWs without mental disorders during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. Health-related factors, work-related factors and interpersonal stress are important risks of persistence of mental disorders and of incidence of mental disorders. Adequately addressing these factors might have prevented a considerable amount of mental health impact of the pandemic among this vulnerable population. Addressing health-related stress, work-related factors and interpersonal stress might reduce the prevalence of these disorders substantially. Study registration number: NCT0455656

Modelos estadísticos para el metanálisis de estudios de exactitud diagnóstica : aplicación a diferentes escenarios de variabilidad entre estudios

La metodología de revisión sistemática y metanálisis es la más robusta para sintetizar la evidencia disponible sobre la exactitud de una prueba diagnóstica y obtener una estimación global de su sensibilidad y especificidad. La presencia de variabilidad entre estudios o heterogeneidad en estas revisiones es una constante y su análisis es el objeto de este trabajo de tesis. Los objetivos son: i. evaluar cómo se explora y cuantifica la heterogeneidad en este tipo de estudios; ii. proponer medidas adicionales de cuantificación de la heterogeneidad; iii. desarrollar un software para el desarrollo de metanálisis de estudios de exactitud diagnóstica; iv. aplicar esta metodología a diferentes escenarios clínicos y v. desarrollar una guía de lectura crítica de revisiones sistemáticas de pruebas diagnósticas..