2 research outputs found

    Biomembrane solubilization mechanism by Triton X-100: A computational study of the three stage model

    Get PDF
    The solubilization mechanism of lipid membranes in the presence of Triton X-100 (TX-100) is investigated at molecular resolution using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Thanks to the large time and length scales accessible by the hybrid particle-field formulation of the models employed here, the complex process of membrane solubilization has been studied, with the goal of verifying the three stage model reported in the literature. DPPC lipid bilayers and vesicles have been studied at different concentrations of the TX-100 detergent employing coarse grained (CG) models. Systems up to â\u88¼600.000 beads, corresponding to more than 2 millions heavy atoms, have been simulated. Moreover, in order to clarify several experimental pieces of evidence, both slow and fast detergent partition scenarios have been investigated. Flat and curved (vesicles) lipid bilayer surfaces, interacting with TX-100, have been considered to study the curvature effects on the detergent partition rate in the membrane. Shape and conformational changes of mixed DPPC/TX-100 vesicles, as a function of TX-100 content, have also been studied. In particular, high curvature surfaces, corresponding to a higher local TX-100 content, promote a membrane rupture. In flat lipid surfaces, on the time scale simulated the detergent partition is almost absent, following a different pathway of the solubilization membrane mechanism

    Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2) : a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy

    No full text
    Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86-1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91-1·32; p=0·21). Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable
    corecore