Different characteristics of triptans

Despite the pharmacokinetic differences among triptans and the variety of ways of administration, the clinical differences in everyday use of these drugs do not allow a largely accepted decisional tree. There are a number of comparative trials showing similar results with regard to efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these drugs. This means that the patientrsquos preference is one of the most important decisive factors in choosing one triptan over another. A good migraine therapy requires a balance between patient satisfaction and drug efficacy and safety. All the marked triptans show a good benefit-risk ratio, and comorbidity should be considered when choosing between different triptans

Anti-epileptic drugs in the preventive treatment of migraine headache : a brief review.

This review is aimed to give a comprehensive view on drugs used in the prevention of migraine. At time the most promising drugs are included in the so-called group of anti-convulsive drugs. The mechanism of action of these drugs varies within the class, but a possible common action is believed in reducing the neuronal firing and in the stabilizing membrane potential. The clinical choice within the drugs should take into account the possible side effects of each drug, and relate it to clinical needs and characteristics of patient

Relevance of analgesic abuse in the maintenance of chronic headaches

The role of daily use of analgesics is discussed. The literature data are reported and compared with the data collected in the Modena and Trieste Headache Center

Differential involvement of central 5-HT1B and 5-HT3 receptor subtypes in the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol

Objective: We investigated the effect of pre-treatment with ondansetron or CP 93129 (a 5-HT1B agonist) on the antinociceptive activity of paracetamol and the changes in central 5-HT3 receptors induced by paracetamol alone or co-administered with ondansetron. Materials and Subjects: Male Wistar rats (eight per group) were injected with ondansetron (2 and 4 mg/kg s. c.) or CP 93 129 (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg s. c.) 15 min before paracetamol (400 mg/kg, i.p.). Methods: Pain threshold was evaluated in the hot-plate or in the paw pressure test 30 min after the last treatment. 5-HT3 receptor binding capacity was measured in the frontal cortex, temporal-parietal cortex and midbrain by means of radioligand binding technique. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test and 2 X 2 factorial analysis when appropriate. Results: Pre-treatment with ondansetron, at doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg, did not affect the antinociceptive activity of paracetamol in the hot-plate test and in the paw pressure test. Paracetamol did not change the characteristics of 5-HT3 receptors in all the areas investigated. Ondansetron (4 mg/kg s. c) per se significantly increased the 5-HT3 receptor number in the areas used, the effect not being modified by co-administration with paracetamol. On the other hand, CP 93129 (2 mg/kg s. c.) significantly prevented the effect of paracetamol in both algesimetric tests used. Conclusions: Our data indicate that 5-HT1B but not 5-HT3 receptors are involved in the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol in our experimental conditions

Triptans: the experience of a clinical pharmacologist in clinical practice.

Despite the pharmacokinetic differences among triptans and the variety of ways of administration, the clinical differences in every day use of these drugs lack in an accepted decisional tree. In fact, there are a number of comparative trials showing conflicting results with regard to efficacy, onset of action, safety and ecurrence incidence. That means that the patient’s preference probably is the main criterion for choosing one triptan vs. others. This point of view is probably correct considering also that the main cause of therapy failure is noncompliance. A good migraine care strategy requires a balance in what the patient views as satisfactory, a reasonable compromise between efficacy and tolerability, and a careful follow-up. Improvement in compliance should be the main and more immediate goal for the treatment of migraine attacks

The Nursing Role in the Management of Medication Overuse Headache: Realities and Prospects

This review aims to analyze the current literature to identify articles related to the role of nurses and, in general, the nursing management of patients suffering from medication overuse headache (MOH), a globally spread disease. We specifically argue for non-pharmacological approaches to pain management, such as multidisciplinary team approaches, holistic treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise. For this review, we investigated international scientific databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Embase, in the period between 2000 and 2024. We observed a wealth of scientific articles related to MOH, but a poverty of articles relating to the nursing management of headache. The research included the presence of academic-level training for nurses, whereas there are few institutions that train competent professionals in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of MOH patients. Nursing assessment and assistance strategies are indicated to plan tailored treatment paths related to the specific needs of these patients

Effect of acute and repeated administration of paracetamol on opioidergic and serotonergic systems in rats.

Objective and design: We investigated the antinociceptiveeffect of paracetamol or morphine after repeatedadministration and the changes in the characteristics of centralμ-, κ- and 5-HT2 receptors.Treatment: Male rats were injected twice a day for sevendays with paracetamol (400 mg/kg, i. p.) or morphine (5 mg/kg, s. c.).Methods: The antinociceptive effect was evaluated 30 minafter single and multiple doses of paracetamol and morphinethrough the hot-plate test. Binding techniques were used toevaluate the receptor characteristics in the frontal cortex.Results: Both paracetamol and morphine induced an antinociceptiveeffect on day 1 but only paracetamol maintainedthis effect for seven days while morphine did not.The number of μ-opioid receptors decreased on days 1, 3,and 7 by a similar percentage after paracetamol administration(by 29, 31 and 34 %, respectively), while morphineproduced a progressive decrease in comparison with controls(by 37, 49 and 60 %, respectively) and κ-opioid receptorswere unaffected. Both drugs similarly decreased the 5-HT2receptor number on all days of treatment (by about 30 %).Conclusions: The opioidergic and serotonergic systems areinvolved in different ways in the induction and maintenanceof antinociception after paracetamol or morphine treatment

Drug-drug interactions in the treatment for alcohol use disorders: A comprehensive review

Abstract Drug interactions are one of the most common causes of side effects in polypharmacy. Alcoholics are a category of patients at high risk of pharmacological interactions, due to the presence of comorbidities, the concomitant intake of several medications and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interferences of ethanol. However, the data available on this issue are limited. These reasons often frighten clinicians when prescribing appropriate pharmacological therapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD), where less than 15% of patients receive an appropriate treatment in the most severe forms. The data available in literature regarding the relevant drug–drug interactions of the medications currently approved in United States and in some European countries for the treatment of AUD (benzodiazepines, acamprosate, baclofen, disulfiram, nalmefene, naltrexone and sodium oxybate) are reviewed here. The class of benzodiazepines and disulfiram are involved in numerous pharmacological interactions, while they are not conspicuous for acamprosate. The other drugs are relatively safe for pharmacological interactions, excluding the opioid withdrawal syndrome caused by the combination of nalmefene or naltrexone with an opiate medication. The information obtained is designed to help clinicians in understanding and managing the pharmacological interactions in AUDs, especially in patients under multi-drug treatment, in order to reduce the risk of a negative interaction and to improve the treatment outcomes

A case of a GH-producing pituitari adenoma associated with a unilateral headache with autonomic signs.

A 66–year–old man suffered from a drug–resistant, leftsided headache with autonomic signs, triggered by the supine position. The acromegalic facies initially suggested a possible increase in basal plasma levels of GH, but routine haematological controls excluded abnormal values of GH. Cerebral and facial CT scan and MRI did not detect any alterations in the nasal sinuses, except for a mucous cyst. Surgical ablation of the cyst did not alleviate the pain. Further endocrinological tests demonstrated an increase of IGF–1 (somatomedin C), and another MRI scan of the sellar region confirmed the presence of a pituitary macroadenoma on the left paramedian side. After an initial improvement of the symptomatology due to trans–sphenoidal ablation of a benign GH–producing macroadenoma, the headache worsened again. Pain was well correlated with the increased plasma levels of IGF–1. The patient died suddenly for myocardial infarct

Topo-kinesthetic memory in chronic headaches. A new test for chronic patients: preliminary report

The objective of this study was to establish if chronic headaches with medication overuse can modify a topo\u2013kinesthetic memory test. Nineteen patients with medication overuse headache (MOH), 13 patients with chronic tension\u2013type headache (CTTH) without medication use and a group of "normal" subjects underwent a topo\u2013kinesthetic memory test at T0 and after one month (T1); a control group of healthy volunteers was also tested to establish the baseline in our experimental setting. After one month, in the MOH patients there was a reduction of medication overuse from 3.3\ub12.65 to 1.1\ub12.23 (p<0.01), but no significant reduction in headache frequency and severity index, quality of life, anxiety and depression scores. The navigation time at T0 was 14.3\ub14.97, 27.9\ub110.12, 34.3\ub115.38 and 7.5\ub12.33, 10.1\ub12.95, 11.4\ub13.21 for control, MOH and CTTH with closed and open eyes, respectively (p<0.02). At T1, the MOH patients reached performances with open eyes similar to the healthy controls, while with closed eyes the navigation test reached times similar to those of CTTH patients. The topokinesthetic memory test seems both able to discriminate MOH and CTTH from healthy volunteers and to be related to pain scores but is not influenced by the use of drugs