The stem-archosaur evolutionary radiation in South America

The oldest archosauromorphs (dinosaurs, birds, crocodiles, and their stem-taxa) arerecorded in middle−upper Permian rocks, but it was not after the Permo−Triassic massextinction that the group shows a substantially high taxonomic richness andecomorphological disparity. The early evolutionary history of the Archosauromorphaduring the Early and Middle Triassic is mainly based on fossils recovered from rocks insouthern Africa, Europe and Asia, whereas South America possesses a morecomplete fossil record of the group only in the Late Triassic. Here we revisit, discuss,and reanalyse the non-archosaurian archosauromorph fossil record of the current-daySouth America. The Early Triassic archosauromorph record in this continent is stillscarce, but it documents the early evolution of the group in western Pangaea and iscrucial to understand more globally the biotic recovery after the Permo−Triassic massextinction. The Middle Triassic record is extremely scarce, but the Late Triassicarchosauromorph assemblage of South America is among the most diverse andabundant worldwide. The last decade has witnessed a considerable improvement inour knowledge of the record, taxonomy, phylogeny, and macroevolution of the groupwith the input from the South American fossils. Nevertheless, a considerable amount ofresearch is needed and ideally should be focused on some particular aspects of theTriassic evolutionary radiation of Archosauromorpha. Among them, the Early Triassicrecord should be expanded, more numerous and more complete Middle Triassicarchosauromorph specimens are crucial to have a more complete picture of theevolution of the group, and the taxonomy of groups like proterochampsids andhyperodapedontine rhynchosaurs should be clarified through detailed anatomical work.Fil: Ezcurra, Martin Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’; ArgentinaFil: Montefeltro, Felipe C.. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; BrasilFil: Pinheiro, Felipe L.. Universidade Federal do Pampa; BrasilFil: Trotteyn, Maria Jimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Juan. Centro de Investigaciones de la Geosfera y Biosfera. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones de la Geosfera y Biosfera; ArgentinaFil: Gentil, Adriel Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’; ArgentinaFil: Lehmann, Oscar Emilio Rodrigo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’; ArgentinaFil: Pradelli, Luciano Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’; Argentin

Tanystropheid archosauromorphs in the Lower Triassic of Gondwana

Tanystropheidae is a clade of early archosauromorphs with a reported distribution ranging from the Early to the Late Triassic of Asia, Europe, and North America. Although some specimens with possible tanystropheid affinities from the Lower Triassic beds of Brazil have been previously attributed to “Protorosauria”, little is known about the tanystropheid record in Gondwana. Here, two new and one previously reported specimen from the Sanga do Cabral Formation (Induan–Olenekian) of Brazil are described and interpreted as ?Tanystropheidae. These records, together with other tetrapods previously reported for the Sanga do Cabral Formation, increase the knowledge of the biotic diversification during the beginning of the Triassic. This contribution reinforces that the archosauromorph diversification occurred shortly after the Permo-Triassic extinction, making the Sanga do Cabral Formation an important unit for the study of early Mesozoic faunas

Seleção para rendimento e qualidade da castanha em populações de cajueiro anão precoce no Nordeste brasileiro.

bitstream/item/33830/1/Pa-017.pd

Leishmanicidal activity of fractions rich in aporphine alkaloids from amazonian unonopsis species

In vitro evaluation of alkaloidal fractions of twigs, barks and leaves from two Unonopsis species, Unonopsis guatterioides R.E. Fr. and Unonopsis duckei R.E. Fr., Annonaceae, against promastigote forms of Leishmania amazonensis revealed these species as sources of substances with promising leishmanicidal potential. All alkaloidal fractions from twigs, barks and leaves of U. guatterioides were classified as highly active, with IC50 1.07, 1.90, and 2.79 mg/mL, respectively. Only the alkaloidal fraction from the twigs of U. duckei was classified as inactive2261368137

Leishmanicidal activity of fractions rich in aporphine alkaloids from Amazonian Unonopsis species

In vitro evaluation of alkaloidal fractions of twigs, barks and leaves from two Unonopsis species, Unonopsis guatterioides R.E. Fr. and Unonopsis duckei R.E. Fr., Annonaceae, against promastigote forms of Leishmania amazonensis revealed these species as sources of substances with promising leishmanicidal potential. All alkaloidal fractions from twigs, barks and leaves of U. guatterioides were classified as highly active, with IC50 1.07, 1.90, and 2.79 mg/mL, respectively. Only the alkaloidal fraction from the twigs of U. duckei was classified as inactive.2261368137

Digging deeper into colonial palaeontological practices in modern day Mexico and Brazil

Scientific practices stemming from colonialism, whereby middle- and low-income countries supply data for high-income countries and the contributions of local expertise are devalued, are still prevalent today in the field of palaeontology. In response to these unjust practices, countries such as Mexico and Brazil adopted protective laws and regulations during the twentieth century to preserve their palaeontological heritage. However, scientific colonialism is still reflected in many publications describing fossil specimens recovered from these countries. Here, we present examples of ‘palaeontological colonialism’ from publications on Jurassic–Cretaceous fossils from NE Mexico and NE Brazil spanning the last three decades. Common issues that we identified in these publications are the absence of both fieldwork and export permit declarations and the lack of local experts among authorships. In Mexico, access to many fossil specimens is restricted on account of these specimens being housed in private collections, whereas a high number of studies on Brazilian fossils are based on specimens illegally reposited in foreign collections, particularly in Germany and Japan. Finally, we outline and discuss the wider academic and social impacts of these research practices, and propose exhaustive recommendations to scientists, journals, museums, research institutions and government and funding agencies in order to overcome these practices