5 research outputs found
Mitigation of backgrounds from cosmogenic 137Xe in xenon gas experiments using 3He neutron capture
136Xe is used as the target medium for many experiments searching for 0¿ßß. Despite underground operation, cosmic muons that reach the laboratory can produce spallation neutrons causing activation of detector materials. A potential background that is difficult to veto using muon tagging comes in the form of 137Xe created by the capture of neutrons on 136Xe. This isotope decays via beta decay with a half-life of 3.8 min and a Q ß of ~4.16 MeV. This work proposes and explores the concept of adding a small percentage of 3He to xenon as a means to capture thermal neutrons and reduce the number of activations in the detector volume. When using this technique we find the contamination from 137Xe activation can be reduced to negligible levels in tonne and multi-tonne scale high pressure gas xenon neutrinoless double beta decay experiments running at any depth in an underground laboratory
Mitigation of backgrounds from cosmogenic Xe-137 in xenon gas experiments using He-3 neutron capture
[EN] Xe-136 is used as the target medium for many experiments searching for 0 nu beta beta. Despite underground operation, cosmic muons that reach the laboratory can produce spallation neutrons causing activation of detector materials. A potential background that is difficult to veto using muon tagging comes in the form of Xe-137 created by the capture of neutrons on Xe-136. This isotope decays via beta decay with a half-life of 3.8 min and a Q(beta) of similar to 4.16 MeV. This work proposes and explores the concept of adding a small percentage of He-3 to xenon as a means to capture thermal neutrons and reduce the number of activations in the detector volume. When using this technique we find the contamination from Xe-137 activation can be reduced to negligible levels in tonne and multi-tonne scale high pressure gas xenon neutrinoless double beta decay experiments running at any depth in an underground laboratory.The work described was supported by the Department of Energy under Award numbers DE-SC0019054 and DE-SC0019223. The NEXT Collaboration acknowledges support from the following agencies and institutions: the European Research Council (ERC) under the Advanced Grant 339787-NEXT; the European Union's Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant Agreements No. 674896, 690575 and 740055; the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain under grants FIS2014-53371-C04, the Severo Ochoa Program SEV-2014-0398 and the Maria de Maetzu Program MDM-2016-0692; the GVA of Spain under grants PROMETEO/2016/120 and SEJI/2017/011; the Portuguese FCT under project PTDC/FIS-NUC/2525/2014, under project UID/FIS/04559/2013 to fund the activities of LIBPhys, and under grants PD/BD/105921/2014, SFRH/BPD/109180/2015 and SFRH/BPD/76842/2011. Finally, we are grateful to the Laboratorio Subterraneo de Canfranc for hosting and supporting the NEXT experiment.Rogers, L.; Jones, BJP.; Laing, A.; Pingulkar, S.; Smithers, B.; Woodruff, K.; Adams, C.... (2020). Mitigation of backgrounds from cosmogenic Xe-137 in xenon gas experiments using He-3 neutron capture. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 47(7):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab8915S117477Nygren, D. (2009). High-pressure xenon gas electroluminescent TPC for 0-ν ββ-decay search. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 603(3), 337-348. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.222Ferrario, P., Laing, A., López-March, N., Gómez-Cadenas, J. J., Álvarez, V., … Cebrián, S. (2016). First proof of topological signature in the high pressure xenon gas TPC with electroluminescence amplification for the NEXT experiment. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(1). doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)104Monrabal, F., Gómez-Cadenas, J. J., Toledo, J. F., Laing, A., Álvarez, V., Benlloch-Rodríguez, J. M., … Felkai, R. (2018). The NEXT White (NEW) detector. Journal of Instrumentation, 13(12), P12010-P12010. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/12/p12010Martín-Albo, J., Muñoz Vidal, J., Ferrario, P., Nebot-Guinot, M., Gómez-Cadenas, J. J., … Cárcel, S. (2016). Sensitivity of NEXT-100 to neutrinoless double beta decay. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(5). doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)159Felkai, R., Monrabal, F., González-Díaz, D., Sorel, M., López-March, N., Gómez-Cadenas, J. J., … Azevedo, C. D. R. (2018). Helium–Xenon mixtures to improve the topological signature in high pressure gas xenon TPCs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 905, 82-90. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.07.013McDonald, A. D., Woodruff, K., Atoum, B. A., González-Díaz, D., Jones, B. J. P., Adams, C., … Azevedo, C. D. . (2019). Electron drift and longitudinal diffusion in high pressure xenon-helium gas mixtures. Journal of Instrumentation, 14(08), P08009-P08009. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/08/p08009Anton, G., Badhrees, I., Barbeau, P. S., Beck, D., Belov, V., Bhatta, T., … Cen, W. R. (2019). Search for Neutrinoless Double-
β
Decay with the Complete EXO-200 Dataset. Physical Review Letters, 123(16). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.161802Albert, J. B., Anton, G., Arnquist, I. J., Badhrees, I., Barbeau, P., Beck, D., … Brown, E. (2018). Sensitivity and discovery potential of the proposed nEXO experiment to neutrinoless double-
β
decay. Physical Review C, 97(6). doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.065503Gando, A., Gando, Y., Hachiya, T., Hayashi, A., Hayashida, S., … Ikeda, H. (2016). Publisher’s Note: Search for Majorana Neutrinos Near the Inverted Mass Hierarchy Region with KamLAND-Zen [Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 082503 (2016)]. Physical Review Letters, 117(10). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.109903Jones, B. J. P., McDonald, A. D., & Nygren, D. R. (2016). Single molecule fluorescence imaging as a technique for barium tagging in neutrinoless double beta decay. Journal of Instrumentation, 11(12), P12011-P12011. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/12/p12011McDonald, A. D., Jones, B. J. P., Nygren, D. R., Adams, C., Álvarez, V., Azevedo, C. D. R., … Cárcel, S. (2018). Demonstration of Single-Barium-Ion Sensitivity for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Using Single-Molecule Fluorescence Imaging. Physical Review Letters, 120(13). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.132504Thapa, P., Arnquist, I., Byrnes, N., Denisenko, A. A., Foss, F. W., Jones, B. J. P., … Woodruff, K. (2019). Barium Chemosensors with Dry-Phase Fluorescence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay. Scientific Reports, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49283-xChadwick, M. B., Herman, M., Obložinský, P., Dunn, M. E., Danon, Y., Kahler, A. C., … Arcilla, R. (2011). ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data. Nuclear Data Sheets, 112(12), 2887-2996. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002Brown, D. A., Chadwick, M. B., Capote, R., Kahler, A. C., Trkov, A., Herman, M. W., … Dunn, M. (2018). ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8 th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data. Nuclear Data Sheets, 148, 1-142. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001Martínez-Lema, G., Morata, J. A. H., Palmeiro, B., Botas, A., Ferrario, P., Monrabal, F., … Para, A. (2018). Calibration of the NEXT-White detector using 83mKr decays. Journal of Instrumentation, 13(10), P10014-P10014. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10014Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., … Barrand, G. (2003). Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506(3), 250-303. doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8Albert, J. B., Daugherty, S. J., Johnson, T. N., O’Conner, T., Kaufman, L. J., Couture, A., … Krtička, M. (2016). Measurement of neutron capture onXe136. Physical Review C, 94(3). doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.034617Batchelor, R., Aves, R., & Skyrme, T. H. R. (1955). Helium‐3 Filled Proportional Counter for Neutron Spectroscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 26(11), 1037-1047. doi:10.1063/1.1715182Gibbons, J. H., & Macklin, R. L. (1959). Total Neutron Yields from Light Elements under Proton and Alpha Bombardment. Physical Review, 114(2), 571-580. doi:10.1103/physrev.114.571Haesner, B., Heeringa, W., Klages, H. O., Dobiasch, H., Schmalz, G., Schwarz, P., … Käppeler, F. (1983). Measurement of theHe3andHe4total neutron cross sections up to 40 MeV. Physical Review C, 28(3), 995-999. doi:10.1103/physrevc.28.995Antolković, B., Paić, G., Tomaš, P., & Rendić, D. (1967). Study of Neutron-Induced Reactions onHe3atEn=14.4MeV. Physical Review, 159(4), 777-781. doi:10.1103/physrev.159.777Seagrave, J. D., Cranberg, L., & Simmons, J. E. (1960). Elastic Scattering of Fast Neutrons by Tritium andHe3. Physical Review, 119(6), 1981-1991. doi:10.1103/physrev.119.1981Sayres, A. R., Jones, K. W., & Wu, C. S. (1961). Interaction of Neutrons withHe3. Physical Review, 122(6), 1853-1863. doi:10.1103/physrev.122.1853Als-Nielsen, J., & Dietrich, O. (1964). Slow Neutron Cross Sections forHe3, B, and Au. Physical Review, 133(4B), B925-B929. doi:10.1103/physrev.133.b925Bertini, H. W. (1963). Low-Energy Intranuclear Cascade Calculation. Physical Review, 131(4), 1801-1821. doi:10.1103/physrev.131.1801Barashenkov, V. S., Bertini, H. W., Chen, K., Friedlander, G., Harp, G. D., Iljinov, A. S., … Toneev, V. D. (1972). Medium energy intranuclear cascade calculations: a comparative study. Nuclear Physics A, 187(3), 531-544. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(72)90678-1BERTINI, H. W. (1969). Intranuclear-Cascade Calculation of the Secondary Nucleon Spectra from Nucleon-Nucleus Interactions in the Energy Range 340 to 2900 MeV and Comparisons with Experiment. Physical Review, 188(4), 1711-1730. doi:10.1103/physrev.188.1711Wright, D. H., & Kelsey, M. H. (2015). The Geant4 Bertini Cascade. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 804, 175-188. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.058Kudryavtsev, V. A. (2009). Muon simulation codes MUSIC and MUSUN for underground physics. Computer Physics Communications, 180(3), 339-346. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.10.013Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Andersen, T. C., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., … Biller, S. D. (2009). Measurement of the cosmic ray and neutrino-induced muon flux at the Sudbury neutrino observatory. Physical Review D, 80(1). doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.012001Wittenberg, L. J., Santarius, J. F., & Kulcinski, G. L. (1986). Lunar Source of3He for Commercial Fusion Power. Fusion Technology, 10(2), 167-178. doi:10.13182/fst86-a24972Ahmad, Q. R., Allen, R. C., Andersen, T. C., D.Anglin, J., Barton, J. C., Beier, E. W., … Black, R. A. (2002). Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Physical Review Letters, 89(1). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.011301Amsbaugh, J. F., Anaya, J. M., Banar, J., Bowles, T. J., Browne, M. C., Bullard, T. V., … Deng, H. (2007). An array of low-background 3He proportional counters for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 579(3), 1054-1080. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.321Tastevin, G. (2000). Optically Polarized Helium-3 for N.M.R. Imaging in Medicine. Physica Scripta, T86(1), 46. doi:10.1238/physica.topical.086a00046Fain, S., Schiebler, M. L., McCormack, D. G., & Parraga, G. (2010). Imaging of lung function using hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging: Review of current and emerging translational methods and applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 32(6), 1398-1408. doi:10.1002/jmri.22375Korff, S. A., & Danforth, W. E. (1939). Neutron Measurements with Boron-Trifluoride Counters. Physical Review, 55(10), 980-980. doi:10.1103/physrev.55.980Lintereur, A., Conlin, K., Ely, J., Erikson, L., Kouzes, R., Siciliano, E., … Woodring, M. (2011). 3He and BF3 neutron detector pressure effect and model comparison. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 652(1), 347-350. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.10.040Fowler, I. L., & Tunnicliffe, P. R. (1950). Boron Trifluoride Proportional Counters. Review of Scientific Instruments, 21(8), 734-740. doi:10.1063/1.1745700Segrè, E., & Wiegand, C. (1947). Boron Trifluoride Neutron Detector for Low Neutron Intensities. Review of Scientific Instruments, 18(2), 86-89. doi:10.1063/1.1740909Böhlen, T. T., Cerutti, F., Chin, M. P. W., Fassò, A., Ferrari, A., Ortega, P. G., … Vlachoudis, V. (2014). The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications. Nuclear Data Sheets, 120, 211-214. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.049Ferrari, A., Sala, P. R., Fasso, A., & Ranft, J. (2005). FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code. doi:10.2172/87750
A new emission reduction approach in MILD combustion through asymmetric fuel injection
This paper presents investigations with asymmetric liquid fuel injection (kerosene and biodiesel) into a combustor operating in MILD (moderate or intense low oxygen dilution) combustion regime with thermal inputs varying from 25 kW (6.34 MW/m(3))-53 kW (13.3 MW/m(3)). Effect of air-preheat temperature on temperature distribution and pollutant emissions is investigated by varying the incoming air temperature from 300 to 800K. The position of asymmetric fuel injection is optimized based on numerical studies to maximize internal recirculation rate, R-dil. Maximum R-dil values of 4.54 and 3.52 are obtained for asymmetric and symmetric fuel injection cases respectively. Different fuel injection pressures of 14, 30, and 48 bar with the same nozzle are used to achieve different mass flow rates of 2.5/2.45, 3.12/3.10, and 4.46/4.3 kg/h for kerosene/biodiesel fuels respectively. Shadowgraphy studies show that measured Sauter Mean Diameters (SMD) vary from 34 to 19 pm and 108 to 37 pm for kerosene and biodiesel respectively, with fuel injection pressure varying from 14 to 48 bar. The combustor showed increased flame stability up to a global equivalence ratio of phi=0.2 for asymmetric fuel injection compared to phi=0.6 in symmetric fuel injection case, due to higher temperatures measured in the central zone of combustor. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved