2 research outputs found

    Lenalidomide Maintenance and Measurable Residual Disease in a Real-World Multiple Myeloma Transplanted Population Receiving Different Treatment Strategies Guided by Access to Novel Drugs in Brazil

    Get PDF
    Despite recent advances in multiple myeloma (MM), the incorporation of novel agents and measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring in low-income countries remains a challenge. Although lenalidomide maintenance (M-Len) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been associated with improved outcomes and MRD has refined the prognosis of complete response (CR) cases, until now, there have been no data on the benefits of these approaches in Latin America. Here, we evaluate the benefits of M-Len and MRD using next-generation flow cytometry (NGF-MRD) at Day + 100 post-ASCT (n = 53). After ASCT, responses were evaluated based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and NGF-MRD. MRD was positive in 60% of patients with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 31 months vs. not reached (NR) for MRD-negative cases (p = 0.05). The patients who received M-Len continuously had a significantly better PFS and overall survival (OS) than those without M-Len (median PFS: NR vs. 29 months, p = 0.007), with progression in 11% vs. 54% of cases after a median follow-up of 34 months, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, MRD status and M-Len therapy emerged as independent predictors of PFS (median PFS of M-Len/MRD− vs. no M-Len/MRD+ of NR vs. 35 months, respectively; p = 0.01). In summary, M-Len was associated with improved survival outcomes in our real-world MM cohort in Brazil, with MRD emerging as a useful reproducible tool to identify patients at an earlier risk of relapse. The inequity in drug access remains a hurdle in countries with financial constraints, with a negative impact on MM survival.This work was supported by from Coordenação de Aperfeiçomento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES) Finance code 001-8888.331795/2010-01; Programa de Oncobiologia 001/2017 and 004/2017; Centro Investigación Biomédica em Red—Cáncer (CIBERONC code CB//00400) of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Science and Innovation (Madrid, Spain), number CB16/12/00400; The International Myeloma Foundation-Black Swan Research Initiative (Los Angeles, CA) (Grant: LSHB-CT-2006-018708). A.B.S.S. was supported by a grant from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES/PROEX, number: 88887.688096/2022-00. R.M.P. was supported by a grant from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/DGPU), number: 000281/2016-06 and CAPES/PROEX 641/2018, Brazil, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro of Brazil (FAPERJ), number: E01/200/537/2018. E.S.B. was supported by a grant from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES/PROEX, number: 88887.335769/2019-00 and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), number: E-26/200.192/2020, Brazil

    First Proposed Panels on Acute Leukemia for Four-Color Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry from the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry-GBCFLUX

    No full text
    Multiparameter flow cytometry is a highly sensitive, fast, and specific diagnostic technology with a wide range of applicability in hematology. Although well-established eight-color immunophenotyping panels are already available, most Brazilian clinical laboratories are equipped with four-color flow cytometer facilities. Based on this fact, the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo, GBCFLUX) for standardization of clinical flow cytometry has proposed an antibody panel designed to allow precise diagnosis and characterization of acute leukemia (AL) within resource-restricted areas. Morphological analysis of bone marrow smears, together with the screening panel, is mandatory for the primary identification of AL. the disease-oriented panels proposed here are divided into three levels of recommendations (mandatory, recommendable, and optional) in order to provide an accurate final diagnosis, as well as allow some degree of flexibility based on available local resources and patient-specific needs. the proposed panels will be subsequently validated in an interlaboratory study to evaluate its effectiveness on the diagnosis and classification of AL. (Assoc editor comm. 2). (c) 2015 International Clinical Cytometry SocietyHosp Amaral Carvalho, Lab Citometria Fluxo Hemonucleo Reg Jau, São Paulo, BrazilFleury Grp, Div Hematol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo UNIFESP EPM, Div Hematol & Blood Transfus Med, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilBrazilian Natl Canc Inst INCa, Canc Res Ctr, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Norte, BR-59072970 Natal, RN, BrazilUniv Estadual Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Rio de Janeiro, Pediat Inst IPPMG, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilUniv Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilLab Diagnost Amer, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilUniv Fed Santa Catarina, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, BrazilHosp Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, BrazilCtr Hematol, São Paulo, BrazilLab Diagnost Amer, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo UNIFESP EPM, Div Hematol & Blood Transfus Med, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc
    corecore