5 research outputs found
Deep Learning for Distinguishing Normal versus Abnormal Chest Radiographs and Generalization to Unseen Diseases
Chest radiography (CXR) is the most widely-used thoracic clinical imaging
modality and is crucial for guiding the management of cardiothoracic
conditions. The detection of specific CXR findings has been the main focus of
several artificial intelligence (AI) systems. However, the wide range of
possible CXR abnormalities makes it impractical to build specific systems to
detect every possible condition. In this work, we developed and evaluated an AI
system to classify CXRs as normal or abnormal. For development, we used a
de-identified dataset of 248,445 patients from a multi-city hospital network in
India. To assess generalizability, we evaluated our system using 6
international datasets from India, China, and the United States. Of these
datasets, 4 focused on diseases that the AI was not trained to detect: 2
datasets with tuberculosis and 2 datasets with coronavirus disease 2019. Our
results suggest that the AI system generalizes to new patient populations and
abnormalities. In a simulated workflow where the AI system prioritized abnormal
cases, the turnaround time for abnormal cases reduced by 7-28%. These results
represent an important step towards evaluating whether AI can be safely used to
flag cases in a general setting where previously unseen abnormalities exist
ELIXR: Towards a general purpose X-ray artificial intelligence system through alignment of large language models and radiology vision encoders
Our approach, which we call Embeddings for Language/Image-aligned X-Rays, or
ELIXR, leverages a language-aligned image encoder combined or grafted onto a
fixed LLM, PaLM 2, to perform a broad range of tasks. We train this lightweight
adapter architecture using images paired with corresponding free-text radiology
reports from the MIMIC-CXR dataset. ELIXR achieved state-of-the-art performance
on zero-shot chest X-ray (CXR) classification (mean AUC of 0.850 across 13
findings), data-efficient CXR classification (mean AUCs of 0.893 and 0.898
across five findings (atelectasis, cardiomegaly, consolidation, pleural
effusion, and pulmonary edema) for 1% (~2,200 images) and 10% (~22,000 images)
training data), and semantic search (0.76 normalized discounted cumulative gain
(NDCG) across nineteen queries, including perfect retrieval on twelve of them).
Compared to existing data-efficient methods including supervised contrastive
learning (SupCon), ELIXR required two orders of magnitude less data to reach
similar performance. ELIXR also showed promise on CXR vision-language tasks,
demonstrating overall accuracies of 58.7% and 62.5% on visual question
answering and report quality assurance tasks, respectively. These results
suggest that ELIXR is a robust and versatile approach to CXR AI
Viral coinfections in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients recruited to the international severe acute respiratory and emerging infections consortium WHO clinical characterisation protocol UK study
Background
We conducted this study to assess the prevalence of viral coinfection in a well characterized cohort of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and to investigate the impact of coinfection on disease severity.
Methods
Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction testing for endemic respiratory viruses was performed on upper respiratory tract samples from 1002 patients with COVID-19, aged <1 year to 102 years old, recruited to the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK study. Comprehensive demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected prospectively up to 28 days post discharge.
Results
A coinfecting virus was detected in 20 (2.0%) participants. Multivariable analysis revealed no significant risk factors for coinfection, although this may be due to rarity of coinfection. Likewise, ordinal logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between coinfection and increased disease severity.
Conclusions
Viral coinfection was rare among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United Kingdom during the first 18 months of the pandemic. With unbiased prospective sampling, we found no evidence of an association between viral coinfection and disease severity. Public health interventions disrupted normal seasonal transmission of respiratory viruses; relaxation of these measures mean it will be important to monitor the prevalence and impact of respiratory viral coinfections going forward
Longitudinal associations of DNA methylation and sleep in children: a meta-analysis
Abstract Background Sleep is important for healthy functioning in children. Numerous genetic and environmental factors, from conception onwards, may influence this phenotype. Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation have been proposed to underlie variation in sleep or may be an early-life marker of sleep disturbances. We examined if DNA methylation at birth or in school age is associated with parent-reported and actigraphy-estimated sleep outcomes in children. Methods We meta-analysed epigenome-wide association study results. DNA methylation was measured from cord blood at birth in 11 cohorts and from peripheral blood in children (4–13 years) in 8 cohorts. Outcomes included parent-reported sleep duration, sleep initiation and fragmentation problems, and actigraphy-estimated sleep duration, sleep onset latency and wake-after-sleep-onset duration. Results We found no associations between DNA methylation at birth and parent-reported sleep duration (n = 3658), initiation problems (n = 2504), or fragmentation (n = 1681) (p values above cut-off 4.0 × 10–8). Lower methylation at cg24815001 and cg02753354 at birth was associated with longer actigraphy-estimated sleep duration (p = 3.31 × 10–8, n = 577) and sleep onset latency (p = 8.8 × 10–9, n = 580), respectively. DNA methylation in childhood was not cross-sectionally associated with any sleep outcomes (n = 716–2539). Conclusion DNA methylation, at birth or in childhood, was not associated with parent-reported sleep. Associations observed with objectively measured sleep outcomes could be studied further if additional data sets become available