Total marrow irradiation for hematopoietic malignancies using volumetric modulated arc therapy: A review of treatment planning studies

Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) has been introduced in the management of hematopoietic malignancies with the aim of reducing toxicities induced by total body irradiation. TMI is one of the most challenging planning and delivery techniques of radiotherapy, as the whole skeleton should be irradiated, while sparing nearby organs at risk (OARs). Target volumes of 7–10 k cm3 and healthy tissue volumes of 50–90 k cm3 should be considered and inverse treatment planning is needed. This review focused on aspects of TMI delivery using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In particular, multiple arcs from isocenters with different positions are required for VMAT-TMI as the cranial-caudal lengths of patients are much larger than the jaw aperture. Therefore, many field junctions between arcs with different isocenters should be managed. This review covered, in particular, feasibility studies for managing multiple isocenters, optimization of plan parameters, plan optimization of the lower extremities, robustness of field junctions and dosimetric plan verification of VMAT-TMI. This review demonstrated the possibility of VMAT in delivering TMI with multi-arcs and multi-isocenters. Care should be paid in the patient repositioning, with particular attention to the cranial-caudal direction. Keywords: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI), Plan optimization, Radiotherap

Segmentation of Planning Target Volume in CT Series for Total Marrow Irradiation Using U-Net

Radiotherapy (RT) is a key component in the treatment of various cancers, including Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML). Precise delineation of organs at risk (OARs) and target areas is essential for effective treatment planning. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques, such as Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) and Total Marrow and Lymph node Irradiation (TMLI), provide more precise radiation delivery compared to Total Body Irradiation (TBI). However, these techniques require time-consuming manual segmentation of structures in Computerized Tomography (CT) scans by the Radiation Oncologist (RO). In this paper, we present a deep learning-based auto-contouring method for segmenting Planning Target Volume (PTV) for TMLI treatment using the U-Net architecture. We trained and compared two segmentation models with two different loss functions on a dataset of 100 patients treated with TMLI at the Humanitas Research Hospital between 2011 and 2021. Despite challenges in lymph node areas, the best model achieved an average Dice score of 0.816 for PTV segmentation. Our findings are a preliminary but significant step towards developing a segmentation model that has the potential to save radiation oncologists a considerable amount of time. This could allow for the treatment of more patients, resulting in improved clinical practice efficiency and more reproducible contours

Ensemble Methods for Multi-Organ Segmentation in CT Series

In the medical images field, semantic segmentation is one of the most important, yet difficult and time-consuming tasks to be performed by physicians. Thanks to the recent advancement in the Deep Learning models regarding Computer Vision, the promise to automate this kind of task is getting more and more realistic. However, many problems are still to be solved, like the scarce availability of data and the difficulty to extend the efficiency of highly specialised models to general scenarios. Organs at risk segmentation for radiotherapy treatment planning falls in this category, as the limited data available negatively affects the possibility to develop general-purpose models; in this work, we focus on the possibility to solve this problem by presenting three types of ensembles of single-organ models able to produce multi-organ masks exploiting the different specialisations of their components. The results obtained are promising and prove that this is a possible solution to finding efficient multi-organ segmentation methods

Initial experience of hypofractionated radiation retreatment with true beam and flattening filter free beam in selected case reports of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

AimTo show our preliminary experience in using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic re-irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BackgroundThanks to new advanced techniques, as well as intensity modulated radiation therapy, it is possible to approach head and neck recurrences in selected patients. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in its RapidArc® format, permits to reduce significantly the time to deliver complex intensity modulated plans, allowing to treat hypofractionated regimes within a few minutes. With TrueBeam it is possible to perform photon beams without usage of the flattening filter. It seems possible to expect a reduction of out-of-field dose when flattening filter free (FFF) beams are used. While research into the physics domain for FFF beams is increasing, there are very few clinical data where FFF beams are applied in clinical practice.Materials and methodsWe present here the cases of 4 patients with local or regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. All patients were treated using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic hypofractionated re-irradiation.ResultsAll patients concluded SBRT and showed good tolerability. During follow-up, complete response at imaging evaluation (PET and/or MRI) for all treated patients was documented.ConclusionsOur preliminary experience using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic hypofractionated re-irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was safe and effective in all 4 treated patients. Longer follow-up and a larger population of study is needed to confirm these promising results

Large volume unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: acute toxicity and initial outcome results with rapid arc

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To report acute toxicity, initial outcome results and planning therapeutic parameters in radiation treatment of advanced lung cancer (stage III) with volumetric modulated arcs using RapidArc (RA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four consecutive patients were treated with RA. All showed locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with stage IIIA-IIIB and with large volumes (GTV:299 ± 175 cm³, PTV:818 ± 206 cm³). Dose prescription was 66Gy in 33 fractions to mean PTV. Delivery was performed with two partial arcs with a 6 MV photon beam.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From a dosimetric point of view, RA allowed us to respect most planning objectives on target volumes and organs at risk. In particular: for GTV D_1%= 105.6 ± 1.7%, D_99%= 96.7 ± 1.8%, D_5%-D_95%= 6.3 ± 1.4%; contra-lateral lung mean dose resulted in 13.7 ± 3.9Gy, for spinal cord D_1%= 39.5 ± 4.0Gy, for heart V_45Gy= 9.0 ± 7.0Gy, for esophagus D_1%= 67.4 ± 2.2Gy. Delivery time was 133 ± 7s. At three months partial remission > 50% was observed in 56% of patients. Acute toxicities at 3 months showed 91% with grade 1 and 9% with grade 2 esophageal toxicity; 18% presented grade 1 and 9% with grade 2 pneumonia; no grade 3 acute toxicity was observed. The short follow-up does not allow assessment of local control and progression free survival.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>RA proved to be a safe and advantageous treatment modality for NSCLC with large volumes. Long term observation of patients is needed to assess outcome and late toxicity.</p

Early clinical experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To report about early clinical experience in radiation treatment of head and neck cancer of different sites and histology by volumetric modulated arcs with the RapidArc technology.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>During 2009, 45 patients were treated at Istituto Clinico Humanitas with RapidArc (28 males and 17 females, median age 65 years). Of these, 78% received concomitant chemotherapy. Thirty-six patients were treated as exclusive curative intent (group A), three as postoperative curative intent (group B) and six with sinonasal tumours (group C). Dose prescription was at Planning Target Volumes (PTV) with simultaneous integrated boost: 54.45Gy and 69.96Gy in 33 fractions (group A); 54.45Gy and 66Gy in 33 fractions (group B) and 55Gy in 25 fractions (group C).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Concerning planning optimization strategies and constraints, as per PTV coverage, for all groups, D_98%> 95% and V_95%> 99%. As regards organs at risk, all planning objectives were respected, and this was correlated with observed acute toxicity rates. Only 28% of patients experienced G3 mucositis, 14% G3 dermitis 44% had G2 dysphagia. Nobody required feeding tubes to be placed during treatment. Acute toxicity is also related to chemotherapy. Two patients interrupted the course of radiotherapy because of a quick worsening of general clinical condition.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These preliminary results stated that volumetric modulated arc therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers is feasible and effective, with acceptable toxicities.</p

A multi-center output factor intercomparison to uncover systematic inaccuracies in small field dosimetry

Large uncertainties in output factor (OF) small fields dosimetry motivated multicentric studies. The focus of the study was the determination of the OFs, for different linacs and radiosurgery units, using new-generation detectors. Intercomparison studies between radiotherapy centers improved quality dosimetry practices. Results confirmed the effectiveness of the studies to uncover large systematic inaccuracies in small field dosimetry. Keywords: Multicentric studies, Small field dosimetry, Output factor

Evaluation of plan complexity and dosimetric plan quality of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy

PurposeTo assess the impact of the planner's experience and optimization algorithm on the plan quality and complexity of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) delivered by means of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) over 2010-2022 at our institute. MethodsEighty-two consecutive TMLI plans were considered. Three complexity indices were computed to characterize the plans in terms of leaf gap size, irregularity of beam apertures, and modulation complexity. Dosimetric points of the target volume (D2%) and organs at risk (OAR) (Dmean) were automatically extracted to combine them with plan complexity and obtain a global quality score (GQS). The analysis was stratified based on the different optimization algorithms used over the years, including a knowledge-based (KB) model. Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) using Portal Dosimetry was performed retrospectively, and the gamma agreement index (GAI) was investigated in conjunction with plan complexity. ResultsPlan complexity significantly reduced over the years (r = -0.50, p &lt; 0.01). Significant differences in plan complexity and plan dosimetric quality among the different algorithms were observed. Moreover, the KB model allowed to achieve significantly better dosimetric results to the OARs. The plan quality remained similar or even improved during the years and when moving to a newer algorithm, with GQS increasing from 0.019 +/- 0.002 to 0.025 +/- 0.003 (p &lt; 0.01). The significant correlation between GQS and time (r = 0.33, p = 0.01) indicated that the planner's experience was relevant to improve the plan quality of TMLI plans. Significant correlations between the GAI and the complexity metrics (r = -0.71, p &lt; 0.01) were also found. ConclusionBoth the planner's experience and algorithm version are crucial to achieve an optimal plan quality in TMLI plans. Thus, the impact of the optimization algorithm should be carefully evaluated when a new algorithm is introduced and in system upgrades. Knowledge-based strategies can be useful to increase standardization and improve plan quality of TMLI treatments

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumours using flattening filter free beam: dosimetric and technical considerations

Purpose: To report the initial institute experience in terms of dosimetric and technical aspects in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered using flattening filter free (FFF) beam in patients with liver lesions.Methods and Materials: From October 2010 to September 2011, 55 consecutive patients with 73 primary or metastatic hepatic lesions were treated with SBRT on TrueBeam using FFF beam and RapidArc technique. Clinical target volume (CTV) was defined on multi-phase CT scans, PET/CT, MRI, and 4D-CT. Dose prescription was 75 Gy in 3 fractions to planning target volume (PTV). Constraints for organs at risk were: 700 cc of liver free from the 15 Gy isodose, D max < 21 Gy for stomach and duodenum, D max < 30 Gy for heart, D 0.1 cc < 18 Gy for spinal cord, V 15 Gy < 35% for kidneys. The dose was downscaled in cases of not full achievement of dose constraints. Daily cone beam CT (CBCT) was performed.Results: Forty-three patients with a single lesion, nine with two lesions and three with three lesions were treated with this protocol. Target and organs at risk objectives were met for all patients. Mean delivery time was 2.8 ± 1.0 min. Pre-treatment plan verification resulted in a Gamma Agreement Index of 98.6 ± 0.8%. Mean on-line co-registration shift of the daily CBCT to the simulation CT were: -0.08, 0.05 and -0.02 cm with standard deviations of 0.33, 0.39 and 0.55 cm in, vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions respectively.Conclusions: SBRT for liver targets delivered by means of FFF resulted to be feasible with short beam on time. © 2012 Mancosu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

Automatic planning of the lower extremities for total marrow irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy

Purpose Total marrow (and lymphoid) irradiation (TMI-TMLI) is limited by the couch travel range of modern linacs, which forces the treatment delivery to be split into two plans with opposite orientations: a head-first supine upper-body plan, and a feet-first supine lower extremities plan. A specific field junction is thus needed to obtain adequate target coverage in the overlap region of the two plans. In this study, an automatic procedure was developed for field junction creation and lower extremities plan optimization. Methods Ten patients treated with TMI-TMLI at our institution were selected retrospectively. The planning of the lower extremities was performed automatically. Target volume parameters (CTV_J-V-98% &gt; 98%) at the junction region and several dose statistics (D-98%, D-mean, and D-2%) were compared between automatic and manual plans. The modulation complexity score (MCS) was used to assess plan complexity. Results The automatic procedure required 60-90 min, depending on the case. All automatic plans achieved clinically acceptable dosimetric results (CTV_J-V-98% &gt; 98%), with significant differences found at the junction region, where D-mean and D-2% increased on average by 2.4% (p &lt; 0.03) and 3.0% (p &lt; 0.02), respectively. Similar plan complexity was observed (median MCS = 0.12). Since March 2022, the automatic procedure has been introduced in our clinic, reducing the TMI-TMLI simulation-to-delivery schedule by 2 days. Conclusion The developed procedure allowed treatment planning of TMI-TMLI to be streamlined, increasing efficiency and standardization, preventing human errors, while maintaining the dosimetric plan quality and complexity of manual plans. Automated strategies can simplify the future adoption and clinical implementation of TMI-TMLI treatments in new centers