The Livelihood Change of Fishermen Recipient Grant Program of Coalition Party in Lubuk Puding Village Buru District of Karimun Regency of Riau Islands Province

This study was conducted in January 2016 in the village of Lubuk Puding in the District of Buru Karimun Riau Islands Province. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of fishing grantees, to determine changes in fishing livelihoods after receiving the grant, and to determine the relationship characteristic of changes, livelihoods and grants program. The method used in this study was survey of 160 grantees fishermen population, in which this study taken as much as 15% of the 160 populations or 24 peoples.Based on the research result, the characteristics of grant recipient are productive fishermenage, low education and the number of family member of fishermen. The livelihood of fishermen grant recipients changed from the preparatory stage to the growth stage, while in food consumption and employment on a fixed income and sanitation and hygiene unchanged. Characteristics with real changes in the livelihoods of fishermen are age which have relationship with income and with the job opportunities, the number of family member has relationship with food consumption and grant, and food consumption have relationships with the grant

Freezing Behavior as a Response to Sexual Visual Stimuli as Demonstrated by Posturography

<div><p>Posturographic changes in motivational conditions remain largely unexplored in the context of embodied cognition. Over the last decade, sexual motivation has been used as a good canonical working model to study motivated social interactions. The objective of this study was to explore posturographic variations in response to visual sexual videos as compared to neutral videos. Our results support demonstration of a freezing-type response in response to sexually explicit stimuli compared to other conditions, as demonstrated by significantly decreased standard deviations for (i) the center of pressure displacement along the mediolateral and anteroposterior axes and (ii) center of pressure’s displacement surface. These results support the complexity of the motor correlates of sexual motivation considered to be a canonical functional context to study the motor correlates of motivated social interactions.</p></div

Mean motor indices in response to various stimuli.

<p>¹: COP position in the anteroposterior direction;</p><p>²: Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the mediolateral direction;</p><p>³: COP position in the mediolateral direction;</p><p>⁴: Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the anteroposterior direction;</p><p>⁵: Area encompassed by displacements of the COP;</p><p>⁶: Standard displacement of the COP in the mediolateral direction;</p><p>⁷: Standard displacement of the COP in the anteroposterior direction. Number in bracket is the Standard Deviation.</p><p>Mean motor indices in response to various stimuli.</p

Freezing Behavior as a Response to Sexual Visual Stimuli as Demonstrated by Posturography - Fig 1

<p>Mean ± SD for postural indices as a function of the stimulus (A) Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the mediolateral direction (Amp [COP]-ML) (B) Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the anteroposterior direction (Amp [COP]-AP) (C) Standard displacement of the COP in the mediolateral direction (SD [COP]-ML) (D) Standard displacement of the COP in the anteroposterior direction (SD [COP]-AP) (E) Area encompassed by displacements of the COP (COP-Area) Significant differences are indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p<0.01 when comparing stimulus.</p

Schematic representation of the paradigm: the description of the task for each of the four blocks (Self, Other-Most-Loved-Familiar, Other-Most-Hated-Familiar and Other-Stranger) was presented and a fixation cross was displayed for 500 ms in the instruction part.

<p>An image of a painful or non-painful stimulus was presented until the participant had rated the imagined level of pain from 0 to 9 using a keyboard. After an interstimulus interval of 1000 ms, a new stimulus was displayed on the screen.</p

Pain ratings (Mean values ± SD) as a function of stimuli (painful vs. non-painful) and perspective (other-negative familiar, other-unknown, self, other-positive familiar).

<p>Pain ratings (Mean values ± SD) as a function of stimuli (painful vs. non-painful) and perspective (other-negative familiar, other-unknown, self, other-positive familiar).</p

Response time (Means values ± SD) as a function of stimuli and perspective.

<p>Response time (Means values ± SD) as a function of stimuli and perspective.</p

Brain imaging of the rejection process in patient 3 and its reversion under treatment.

<p>Magnetic resonance imaging and metabolic activity using ¹⁸F-deoxyglucose before surgery (T0), during the rejection process (T1) and after 6 months of reinstated immunosuppressive treatment (T2) are shown separately (upper and middle panel, respectively), then co-registered (lower panel). The white arrow indicates the right striatum. The false colour scale shows levels of metabolic activities from lowest (min) to highest (max).</p

Observed performance at one year (A₃), with A₁ or A₂ used as the baseline, in the MIG-HD cohort.

<p>SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test; Stroop C, W and C/W: Stroop color, word and color/word interference; MDRS: Mattis Dementia Rating Scale; TMT A, B: Trail-Making Test A and B; TFC: Total Functional Capacity; IS: Independence Scale; FAS: Functional Assessment Scale. The red curve represents the baseline (reference score). The blue (or green) curve corresponds to the mean relative score one year later (A₃), with A₁ (or A₂ for the green curve) used as the baseline. A green curve within the blue curve indicates that the decline was easier to detect if A₂ was used as the baseline, rather than A₁. Paired <i>t</i>-tests, significance: * <i>P</i><0.05, ** <i>P</i><0.01, *** <i>P</i><0.001.</p

Impact of the retest effect in the MIG-HD cohort.

<p>SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test; Stroop C, W and C/W: Stroop color, word and color/word interference; MDRS: Mattis Dementia Rating Scale; TMT A, B: Trail-Making Test A and B; TFC: Total Functional Capacity; IS: Independence Scale; FAS: Functional Assessment Scale. The red curve represents the baseline (reference score A₁) and the blue curve shows the mean relative score one month later (A₂). The portion of the blue curve beyond the red curve indicates performance improvement between A₁ and A₂. Paired <i>t</i>-tests, significance: * <i>P</i><0.05, ** <i>P</i><0.01, *** <i>P</i><0.001.</p