New Insights into Iron Deficiency Anemia in Children: A Practical Review

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most frequent hematological disorder in children, with an incidence in industrialized countries of 20.1% between 0 and 4 years of age and 5.9% between 5 and 14 years (39 and 48.1% in developing countries). Although IDA has been recognized for a long time, there are still uncovered issues and room for improving the management of this condition. New frontiers regarding its diagnosis and therapeutic options emerge every day; recently, innovative formulations of iron have been launched, both for oral and parenteral administration, with the aim of offering treatment schedules with higher efficacy and lower toxicity. As a matter of fact, glycinate and liposomal preparations, while maintaining a satisfying efficacy profile, have significantly fewer side effects, in comparison to the traditional elemental iron salts; parenteral iron, usually considered a second-choice therapy reserved to selected cases, may evolve further, as a consequence of the production of molecules with an interesting clinical profile such as ferrocarboxymaltose, which is already available for adolescents aged >14 years. The present article reports the clinically relevant latest insights regarding IDA in children and offers a practical guide to help pediatricians, particularly to choose the most appropriate prevention and therapy strategies

Organizing national responses for rare blood disorders: the Italian experience with sickle cell disease in childhood on behalf of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology (AIEOP) Sickle Cell Disease Working Group

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most frequent hemoglobinopathy worldwide but remains a rare blood disorder in most western countries. Recommendations for standard of care have been produced in the United States, the United Kingdom and France, where this disease is relatively frequent because of earlier immigration from Africa. These recommendations have changed the clinical course of SCD but can be difficult to apply in other contexts. The Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology Oncology (AIEOP) decided to develop a common national response to the rising number of SCD patients in Italy with the following objectives: 1) to create a national working group focused on pediatric SCD, and 2) to develop tailored guidelines for the management of SCD that could be accessed and practiced by those involved in the care of children with SCD in Italy. Methods: Guidelines, adapted to the Italian social context and health system, were developed by 22 pediatric hematologists representing 54 AIEOP centers across Italy. The group met five times for a total of 128 hours in 22 months; documents and opinions were circulated via web. Results: Recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of the most relevant complications of SCD in childhood adapted to the Italian context and health system were produced. For each topic, a pathway of diagnosis and care is detailed, and a selection of health management issues crucial to Italy or different from other countries is described (i.e., use of alternatives for infection prophylaxis because of the lack of oral penicillin in Italy). Conclusions: Creating a network of physicians involved in the day-to-day care of children with SCD is feasible in a country where it remains rare. Providing hematologists, primary and secondary care physicians, and caregivers across the country with web-based guidelines for the management of SCD tailored to the Italian context is the first step in building a sustainable response to a rare but emerging childhood blood disorder and in implementing the World Health Organization's suggestion "to design (and) implement … comprehensive national integrated programs for the prevention and management of SCD"

Diencephalic Syndrome: Misleading Clinical Onset of Low-Grade Glioma

Background: Diencephalic Syndrome is an atypical early manifestation of low-grade gliomas; so, it is important to detect it in patients that experience a failure to thrive despite adequate length growth and food intake. The purpose of this article is to focus attention on this rare but potentially dangerous cause of poor weight gain or stunting in childhood. Materials and Methods: We describe four patients with Diencephalic Syndrome and low-grade gliomas who were evaluated in our institution from January 2017 to December 2021. Case Description and Results: two patients presented with suspected malabsorption, and two presented with a suspected eating disorder. In all cases, neurological symptoms appeared late, explaining the reason for the diagnostic delay, which impacts negatively on prognosis and on quality of life. Currently, patients 1 and 2 have stable disease in second-line therapy, patient 3 has stable disease post end of second-line therapy, and patient 4 has stable disease in first-line therapy. Everyone is in psychophysical rehabilitation. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary evaluation is essential in order to make an early diagnosis and improve prognosis and quality of life

Diagnosis and management of newly diagnosed childhood autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Recommendations from the Red Cell Study Group of the Paediatric Haemato-Oncology Italian Association

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is an uncommon disorder to which paediatric haematology centres take a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The Red Cell Working Group of the Italian Association of Paediatric Onco-haematology (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica, AIEOP) developed this document in order to collate expert opinions on the management of newly diagnosed childhood autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.The diagnostic process includes the direct and indirect antiglobulin tests; recommendations are given regarding further diagnostic tests, specifically in the cases that the direct and indirect antiglobulin tests are negative. Clear-cut definitions of clinical response are stated. Specific recommendations for treatment include: dosage of steroid therapy and tapering modality for warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; the choice of rituximab as first-line therapy for the rare primary transfusion-dependent cold autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; the indications for supportive therapy; the need for switching to second-line therapy. Each statement is provided with a score expressing the level of appropriateness and the agreement among participants

Hydroxyurea prescription, availability and use for children with sickle cell disease in Italy: Results of a National Multicenter survey.

The number of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) has increased in Italy in the past decade due to immigration. In spite of the established efficacy of hydroxyurea (HU) in childhood, population-based data regarding its prescription and effectiveness come mainly from studies performed in adults or outside Europe. POPULATION AND METHODS: The Hydroxyurea in SCD: A Large Nation-wide Cohort Study from Italy was a retrospective cohort study of adult and pediatric patients with SCD attending 32 centers. Pediatric data are analyzed separately. RESULTS: Out of 504 children followed in 11 centers, 206 (40%) were on HU (194 SS/Sβ°, 12 SC/Sß+); 74% came from Sub-Saharian Africa and 18% from Europe. HU therapy indications for SS/Sβ° patients were as follows: 57% painful vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome or both, 24% anemia, 8% anemia, and other reasons (the majority had Hb ≤ 8-8.5 g/dl, revealing scarce acceptance of low Hb values by pediatric hematologist). Mean starting dose was 15.5 mg/kg, and dose at full regimen was 17.1 mg/kg. Mean age at HU therapy was 7.68 years, although it was lower for SS/Sβ° patients. Only 10% started HU before 3 years. In 92%, 500 mg capsule was used; in 6%, the galenic was used; and in 2%, 100 mg tablet was used. Significant reduction of clinical events and inpatients admissions, with improvement in hematological parameters, was observed for SS/Sβ° patients and a trend toward improvement for SC/Sß+ patients was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: HU effectiveness is demonstrated in a national cohort of children with SCD living in Italy, even at a lower dose than recommended, revealing good adherence to a treatment program by a socially vulnerable group of patients such as immigrant

Monitoring oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia: an observational, prospective, multicenter study of AIEOP patients (Associazione Italiana Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica)

Oral ferrous salts are standard treatment for children with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The objective of our study was to monitor oral iron therapy in children, aged 3 months-12 years, with IDA. We prospectively collected clinical and hematological data of children with IDA, from 15 AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia ed. Oncologia Pediatrica) centers. Response was measured by the increase of Hb from baseline. Of the 107 analyzed patients, 18 received ferrous gluconate/sulfate 2 mg/kg (ferrous 2), 7 ferrous gluconate/sulfate 4 mg/kg (ferrous 4), 7 ferric iron salts 2 mg/kg (ferric), 62 bis-glycinate iron 0.45 mg/kg (glycinate), and 13 liposomal iron 0.7-1.4 mg/kg (liposomal). Increase in reticulocytes was evident at 3 days, while Hb increase appeared at 2 weeks. Gain of Hb at 2 and 8 weeks revealed a higher median increase in both ferrous 2 and ferrous 4 groups. Gastro-intestinal side effects were reported in 16% (ferrous 2), 14% (ferrous 4), 6% (glycinate), and 0 (ferric and liposomal) patients. The reticulocyte counts significantly increased after 3 days from the start of oral iron supplementation. Bis-glycinate iron formulation had a good efficacy/safety profile and offers an acceptable alternative to ferrous iron preparations

Retrospective And Prospective Study Of Childhood Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia. A Preliminary Report From The Red Cell Working Group Of The Paediatric Hemato-Oncology Italian Associations (Aieop)

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an uncommon disease of childhood caused by the premature destruction of erythrocytes by autoantibodies. In this rare disease both diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches are not well standardized. The Red Cell Working Group of the Pediatric Italian Hematogy and Oncology Association (AIEOP) developed specific recommendations to help Physicians for AIHA management. The document is available on the AIEOP website since November 1st 2013. The Italian Pediatric AIHA Group began an observational, retrospective and prospective study in order to monitor the management of children with AIHA diagnosed from 2010 to 2018, and to assess whether the availability of AIEOP recommendations had an impact on the clinical management of such patients in AIEOP Centers. We collected a national cohort of 159 children with AIHA from 21 AIEOP Centers; 48 patients were diagnosed before November 2013 and 111 patients after that date. Gender was 56% males and 44% females; median age at diagnosis was 47 months, with 11.9% under 12 months of age; 8.2% of children were born prematurely and 3.9% showed congenital malformations. 23.2 % of patients had a familiar history of immunological, hematological or oncological diseases. The median hemoglobin level at diagnosis was 6.1 gr/dL. Table 1 reports the distribution of our cases, according to the different type of autoantibodies. The comparison between the retrospective and prospective study did not reveal significative differences in clinical and biological presentation. The cold IgM forms were mainly post infective (38.4%) or primary forms (53.8%), only one patient had a secondary form due to a primitive immunodeficiency. These patients did not develop other diseases during follow up (median follow up: 28,6 months). The preliminary results of treatment and follow up of the 146 patients with warm antibody AIHA revealed the following: The treatment with conventional dose of steroids (median dose 2 mg/Kg, range 0.7- 3.5 mg/Kg) was started in 94.4% of patients, in 53% of cases on the same day of diagnosis. A high number of children used additional treatment: red blood cell transfusions (51.4%), high dose Prednisolone (59.7%), high dose i.v. Immunoglobulin (49.7%) and Plasma Exchange (1.4%). 9.5% of patients, with poor responsive disease, needed alternative drugs during the first four weeks of therapy. Response criteria were so defined: a complete response was defined as the achievement of an Hb concentration greater than or equal to the lower normal limit for age with no signs of haemolysis, i.e. normal reticulocyte count and bilirubine concentration. A partial response was defined as an increase of Hb >2 g/dL without the Hb concentration reaching a normal value for the patient age and no response as an increase of Hb< 2 g/dL and/or dependence on transfusion. A complete response was reached by 62.5%, 79.3%, 85.1% at 3, 4, 6 weeks respectively. 14.9% of patients had either a partial response or a resistant disease at 6 weeks. IgG/IgG+C3d positivity was a negative prognostic factor, as compared to positivity to C3d only, with the need of a second line treatment (prevalently Mabthera or Mycophenolate Mofetil) in 31.7% vs 0, respectively (p 0.009). Currently 6.1% of the patients were lost to follow up, 1.3% died, 55,8% are in Complete Response without events and 21.9% of the patients are still on treatment . At the last follow up, in the whole "cohort" of warm AIHA, 58% have a Primary form, 15.7% an isolated post infective form and 27.7% a Secondary form (56% Evans Syndrome). The management of the patients diagnosed after November 2013 was mostly in agreement with our recommendations, whose comprehensive therapeutic algorithm is reported in table 2, with prolonged steroid tapering in order to extend the treatment for at least 6 months. The most important difference between the retrospective and prospective study was the duration of first line treatment: 6 months or more, for steroid dependence, in 71.6% of patients in the prospective study versus 52.3% of the retrospective (p 0.031) and, more importantly, the percentage of relapsed patients: 8.3% in the prospective study versus 29.8% of the retrospective (p 0.001), these data need a longer follow up (median follow up: 24 months in the prospective study versus 63 in the retrospective

Retrospective and Prospective Study of Childhood Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia. a Preliminary Report from the Red Cell Working Group of the Paediatric Hemato-Oncology Italian Associations (AIEOP)

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an uncommon disease of childhood caused by the premature destruction of erythrocytes by autoantibodies. In this rare disease both diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches are not well standardized. The Red Cell Working Group of the Pediatric Italian Hematogy and Oncology Association (AIEOP) developed specific recommendations to help Physicians for AIHA management. The document is available on the AIEOP website since November 1st 2013. The Italian Pediatric AIHA Group began an observational, retrospective and prospective study in order to monitor the management of children with AIHA diagnosed from 2010 to 2018, and to assess whether the availability of AIEOP recommendations had an impact on the clinical management of such patients in AIEOP Centers. We collected a national cohort of 159 children with AIHA from 21 AIEOP Centers; 48 patients were diagnosed before November 2013 and 111 patients after that date. Gender was 56% males and 44% females; median age at diagnosis was 47 months, with 11.9% under 12 months of age; 8.2% of children were born prematurely and 3.9% showed congenital malformations. 23.2 % of patients had a familiar history of immunological, hematological or oncological diseases. The median hemoglobin level at diagnosis was 6.1 gr/dL. Table 1 reports the distribution of our cases, according to the different type of autoantibodies. The comparison between the retrospective and prospective study did not reveal significative differences in clinical and biological presentation. The cold IgM forms were mainly post infective (38.4%) or primary forms (53.8%), only one patient had a secondary form due to a primitive immunodeficiency. These patients did not develop other diseases during follow up (median follow up: 28,6 months). The preliminary results of treatment and follow up of the 146 patients with warm antibody AIHA revealed the following: The treatment with conventional dose of steroids (median dose 2 mg/Kg, range 0.7- 3.5 mg/Kg) was started in 94.4% of patients, in 53% of cases on the same day of diagnosis. A high number of children used additional treatment: red blood cell transfusions (51.4%), high dose Prednisolone (59.7%), high dose i.v. Immunoglobulin (49.7%) and Plasma Exchange (1.4%). 9.5% of patients, with poor responsive disease, needed alternative drugs during the first four weeks of therapy. Response criteria were so defined: a complete response was defined as the achievement of an Hb concentration greater than or equal to the lower normal limit for age with no signs of haemolysis, i.e. normal reticulocyte count and bilirubine concentration. A partial response was defined as an increase of Hb >2 g/dL without the Hb concentration reaching a normal value for the patient age and no response as an increase of Hb< 2 g/dL and/or dependence on transfusion. A complete response was reached by 62.5%, 79.3%, 85.1% at 3, 4, 6 weeks respectively. 14.9% of patients had either a partial response or a resistant disease at 6 weeks. IgG/IgG+C3d positivity was a negative prognostic factor, as compared to positivity to C3d only, with the need of a second line treatment (prevalently Mabthera or Mycophenolate Mofetil) in 31.7% vs 0, respectively (p 0.009). Currently 6.1% of the patients were lost to follow up, 1.3% died, 55,8% are in Complete Response without events and 21.9% of the patients are still on treatment . At the last follow up, in the whole "cohort" of warm AIHA, 58% have a Primary form, 15.7% an isolated post infective form and 27.7% a Secondary form (56% Evans Syndrome). The management of the patients diagnosed after November 2013 was mostly in agreement with our recommendations, whose comprehensive therapeutic algorithm is reported in table 2, with prolonged steroid tapering in order to extend the treatment for at least 6 months. The most important difference between the retrospective and prospective study was the duration of first line treatment: 6 months or more, for steroid dependence, in 71.6% of patients in the prospective study versus 52.3% of the retrospective (p 0.031) and, more importantly, the percentage of relapsed patients: 8.3% in the prospective study versus 29.8% of the retrospective (p 0.001), these data need a longer follow up (median follow up: 24 months in the prospective study versus 63 in the retrospective